Liberal Forum

*Huey » 01 Sep 2024, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 3:43 pm

I was 30 miles fro you , ******.  No wonder daddy told you not to join the service.

Go ahead and tell us why there are two lists and make your own case, Low T.  Not my job to make your case.  Daddy's Lil ******, I'm out with my victory.  See ya tomorrow, Office Boy.  Remember, you know my name, my address, and have directions to my house.

You huddle with a binky.  You talk a big game, ******, but you aint ****.  Ps, these observations, not a meltdown.n Come on down, Tough Guy wannabe.  

I don't do repeats.  Plus, that argument has already been debunked.

Now, to what you have run from for months.  You demand I post something I have posted in the past but you can't act like a man and answer take this challenge:

There is nothing I must do.  Thanks for the admission you are incapable of making a case.

Yo still running:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

I was 30 miles fro you

No wonder daddy told you not to join the service

Go ahead and tell us why there are two lists and make your own case,

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 3:54 pm

where?

we debunked this.

Having served, in wartime, he concluded that the service was full of idiots.

Because there are civilian variants of the original design.

As it amakes clear.

Go ahead and post the title, now that your question was answered.

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 3:54 pm

where?

we debunked this.

Having served, in wartime, he concluded that the service was full of idiots.

Because there are civilian variants of the original design.

As it makes clear.

Go ahead and post the title, now that your question was answered.

*Huey » 02 Sep 2024, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2024, 8:44 am

Nah, he conc,used you were not man enough to serve.


At least we know N you think veterans an idiots .  That’s a keeper.
 

Nah, he conc,used you were not man enough to serve.

At least we know N you think veterans an idiots

Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2024, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2024, 12:20 pm

Here you go with this ****, again.

He volunteered. Joined the Marines....during a big war.

Saw all the hot spots in the Pacific.

You were faced with two options - prison or the service. You joined and went right to the very rear, behind the gear. You spent a career cashing checks. Then, disabled in peacetime, you took a payout and the kiss in the mail. Having spent decades on Mother Government's tit, you now go on as if you were the Sgt. York of REMFs.

Please don't conflate the two paths.

His position was that the service was riddled with idiot.

You are convincing evidence that he nailed it.

*Huey » 02 Sep 2024, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2024, 12:34 pm

       

First and foremost I said nothing derogatory about your dad's service in that post.  I was making fun of you.

I don't care what he did.  This is about what YOU did or did not do.  I don't give a **** if he planted the flag on Mount Suribachi.

Second, you have no clue about where and what I did in the military other than I was crew member on helicopters.  You are also showing your ignorance concerning what they do in the army. 

Maybe if you had showed some balls and met me in Boston I would have told you.  But your are too afraid of your identity becoming public.

You already stated his position, one that you share.  No reframing or take backs.
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2024, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2024, 12:50 pm

You are NEVER to conflate "service to country" with the make work in which you were engaged..

I am just as free to write your story as you presume to be to write mine, Tiny Chronicler...

*Huey » 01 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

• [url=javascript:;]Nominate[/url]
• Report
• [url=javascript:;]Multi Quote[/url]
• Quote

*Huey » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
15 minutes ago
The simple questions have been answered multiple times.   As well as the links I provided you years ago and you still have in your database.  Ya know, where you got the citation.

*Huey » 01 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

 

• [url=javascript:;]Nominate[/url]
• Report
• [url=javascript:;]Multi Quote[/url]
• Quote

*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
4 minutes ago
I bumped the thread where the info is.  If you wish to discuss it you may go there.   

*Huey » 02 Jan 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 2:12 pm

Blackvegetable
Child Groomer, Sexual PredatorPosts: 32365Contact: 
Contact BlackvegetableMoney: 231,993                    

• [url=javascript:;]Nominate[/url]
• Report
• [url=javascript:;]Multi Quote[/url]
• Quote

    "Chase me!"

@Blackvegetable  

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2025, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 2:17 pm

Doesn't answer the questions.

*Huey » 02 Jan 2025, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 2:21 pm

THey have been answered.  Unless YOU answer those questions keep your L.  And when can change the month and week in the challenge to something current.

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2025, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 2:26 pm

No, they haven't...

1 keystroke answers both.

*Huey » 02 Jan 2025, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 2:36 pm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2025, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 3:03 pm

I'm looking for the answer to the questions...I don't see it.

I see a "challenge", but that is not an answer.

*Huey » 02 Jan 2025, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 3:05 pm

I have answered that question multiple times.  It is YOUR turn to answer.  And if you answer correctly I am gone for a month. That fact that you haven't done so shows I am right on this topic.

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2025, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 3:10 pm

But that's obviously not true.

Your current example fails.

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2025, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 3:10 pm

But that's obviously not true.

Your current example fails.

*Huey » 02 Jan 2025, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 3:20 pm

Make the case I am wrong.  You have already posted the info I gave you multiple times, in regards to the answer I have given you multiple times.  I guess your recall really, really sucks.

The challenge is a rebuttal of you reply to the answer.

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2025, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 3:22 pm

Wrong about what?

You haven't answered the questions asked.