Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 9:59 am

Wrong thread.

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
var·i·ant
/ˈverēənt/

noun

1. a form or version of something that differs in some respect from other forms of the same thing or from a standard

 
 

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 10:18 am

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
var·i·ant
/ˈverēənt/

noun

1. a form or version of something that differs in some respect from other forms of the same thing or from a standard

Term of Art -

a word or phrase that has a precise, specialized meaning within a particular field or profession

 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 10:43 am

Term of Art -

a word or phrase that has a precise, specialized meaning within a particular field or profession

And as the last time you pulled that crap I will point out  that even in that definition there are differences.

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 10:53 am

And as the last time you pulled that crap I will point out  that even in that definition there are differences.

Please, Verbal....your presumption is nauseating.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 11:35 am

Please, Verbal....your presumption is nauseating.

You lies and spin to avoid admitting you are wrong is entertaining.

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 12:00 pm

You lies and spin to avoid admitting you are wrong is entertaining.

I'm not wrong.

You clearly are..
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 12:12 pm

I'm not wrong.

You clearly are..

By all means, first tell us your experience firing both weapons and then answer the challenge.  If there was only one design there would not be at least two lists.  Military and civilian.  And remember, The BATF disagrees with you.  

Your refusal to take the challenge ad back up your argument is proof you lost.

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 12:18 pm

By all means, first tell us your experience firing both weapons and then answer the challenge.  If there was only one design there would not be at least two lists.  Military and civilian.  And remember, The BATF disagrees with you.  

Your refusal to take the challenge ad back up your argument is proof you lost.

If you can make the case that it is relevant to the text of the citation.

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 12:18 pm

By all means, first tell us your experience firing both weapons and then answer the challenge.  If there was only one design there would not be at least two lists.  Military and civilian.  And remember, The BATF disagrees with you.  

Your refusal to take the challenge ad back up your argument is proof you lost.

 

The BATF disagrees with you.  

Show me.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 12:46 pm

If you can make the case that it is relevant to the text of the citation.

The citation, dum dum, is from the citation I posted in the challenge.  You are a perfect example of the theory put forth in the know it all thread.  You have only PART of the information and you are making decisions based on a lack of info.

 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 12:46 pm

Show me.

How many times must you be shown the same citation?  Put on a numerical value you on it.  

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 12:55 pm

The citation, dum dum, is from the citation I posted in the challenge.  You are a perfect example of the theory put forth in the know it all thread.  You have only PART of the information and you are making decisions based on a lack of info.

That's **** idiotic.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 12:57 pm

That's **** idiotic.

No, actually, dum dum, what you are posting is the beginning of the wiki page I gave you from year ago.  Now answer the challenge, accept your loss, and NEVER bring this **** of yours up again.

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 1:00 pm

No, actually, dum dum, what you are posting is the beginning of the wiki page I gave you from year ago.  Now answer the challenge, accept your loss, and NEVER bring this **** of yours up again.

Answer the questions.....honestly.

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design



How many families?

How many designs? 
 

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 12:56 pm

How many times must you be shown the same citation?  Put on a numerical value you on it.

Go ahead and post it, and I will once again demonstrate that you are lying.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 12:46 pm

Show me.

       

I LOVE IT!
 

HarperLee » 03 Jan 2025, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 1:10 pm

       

I LOVE IT!

His conviction that he knows it all informs his certainty that he knows it all.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 1:05 pm

Answer the questions.....honestly.

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

How many families?

How many designs?

My answer has not changed since the other 100 times you asked it.  You lost.  You shorter loss is well documented.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 1:06 pm

Go ahead and post it, and I will once again demonstrate that you are lying.

Nope.  You can do that without me posting it again.  The BATF said the weapon was changed in basic design as to not be a machine gun.


That s all you gonna get from me.  Do your own **** work.

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 1:38 pm

Nope.  You can do that without me posting it again.  The BATF said the weapon was changed in basic design as to not be a machine gun.

That s all you gonna get from me.  Do your own **** work.

1) BATF is irrelevant 
2) Your "evidence" DISPROVES your narrative.