Liberal Forum

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:07 pm

No, Liar, it ia about you answering a challenge AFTER I told you how many families and designs.  You have not told us what list the Sporter was on or when it was standard issue for combat.  I checked.  Not here. Or anywhere.  Did you lie to ex and your father this blatantly? 

Keep running.  You lost and you know you lost.

The links are in the challenge and start with the citation I gave you.  This is why you never link to it.  That is why you are running.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2025, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:11 pm

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:07 pm

No, Liar, it ia about you answering a challenge AFTER I told you how many families and designs.  You have not told us what list the Sporter was on or when it was standard issue for combat.  I checked.  Not here. Or anywhere.  Did you lie to ex and your father this blatantly? 

Keep running.  You lost and you know you lost.

The links are in the challenge and start with the citation I gave you.  This is why you never link to it.  That is why you are running.

You were accommodated....in detail, at length....

Why are you melting down?

You didn't answer the question. 
 

 

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:13 pm

What list?  When it was it standard military combat issue?  I am not melting down.  I am watching you bury yourself deeper.  

If you had answered you it honestly you would have been screaming for me to take 5 dies off.  That is why I know you are lying.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2025, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:14 pm

Post the opening paragraph of the article containing this list....

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:16 pm

Nope.  I am then who gave 

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:16 pm

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2025, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:14 pm

Post the opening paragraph of the article containing this list....

Nope.  I am then who gave that to you.  You never read it, but hey.  This is your argument.  I already won, ****** Who Runs Too Far.

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2025, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:17 pm

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:16 pm

Nope.  I am then who gave 

I posted it.

You declined to confirm it.

Now you may post it.

 

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:20 pm

I know.  I gave it to you.  You don't need me to post it.

Here is what I need to see from you.  Need you to post that the AR 15 Sporter is on the civilian list, was not on the military list, and was never issued in the military as a combat weapon.

You can edit my posts all you like to run, ****** Who RunsToo Far, I will just repost.

civilian list, was not on the military list,

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2025, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:22 pm

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:20 pm

I know.  I gave it to you.  You don't need me to post it.

Here is what I need to see from you.  Need you to post that the AR 15 Sporter is on the civilian list, was not on the military list, and was never issued in the military as a combat weapon.

You can edit my posts all you like to run, ****** Who RunsToo Far, I will just repost.

civilian list, was not on the military list,

Of what?

Where?

Now DON'T RUN....AGAIN!

 

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:32 pm

Already told as you continue to prove you never read the info provided.

The links are in the challenge which is the same source that the citation you ignorantly misrepresents located.

Here is a list to the Class 3 dealers in NH.  One is in Nashua.  I suggest you go and ask them to show you the design changes.

https://www.ffl123.com/class-3-dealer-l ... 1CU6ANh7um

I have suggest this before,

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2025, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:42 pm

You're still running from the question.....

You should stop doing that, people will assume that you are a ******...

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2025, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 1:14 pm

A) I've already done it

B) You won't even tell me what "your" citation is about.

You run from all questions.

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:46 pm

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2025, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:42 pm

You're still running from the question.....

You should stop doing that, people will assume that you are a ******...

I have already won.  You are on an epic Forrest Gump run avoiding the challenge from last year.

The Sporter was never military combat issue because it was designed for civilian use.

The Sporter is listed on the civilian list because it is designed for civilian use.

 

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 3:31 pm

You clam you have honestly answer it.  Then you agree with the following.

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2025, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 4:55 pm

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 3:31 pm

You clam you have honestly answer it.  Then you agree with the following.


 

Just post my words...

 

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 4:58 pm

I did .  You said you already answered it honestly.  If you answered it honestly your must agree that:

1.  The Colt Sporter is not on the military list because it was not designed for combat.

2.  The Colt Sporter is not on the civilian list because it was designed for civilians.

Those are the only two honest answers.  You **** lost ****.  

Do not bother me any more with this bullshti.  Bumping this post will be my response. 

Good Night ****** Who Runs Too Far.

What a **** loser.

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 1:12 pm

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 12:33 pm

*Huey » 01 Sep 2024, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 12:23 pm

Nope.  There is a challenge you have been running from for months.  Answer it and it will end this.  Remember, honest answers to both and I am gone a week.

This is why most people here think you are a ******.  You are not man enough to admit when you are wrong, Beta.

Take the L.


 

Hey ******, you say something about running.  Get the **** out here.

*Huey » 01 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 12:33 pm

Take the L.

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.


 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2025, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 1:14 pm

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 1:12 pm

Hey ******, you say something about running.  Get the **** out here.

A) I've already done it

B) You won't even tell me what "your" citation is about.

You run from all questions. 
 

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2025, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 5:21 pm

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 4:58 pm

I did .  You said you already answered it honestly.  If you answered it honestly your must agree that:

1.  The Colt Sporter is not on the military list because it was not designed for combat.

2.  The Colt Sporter is not on the civilian list because it was designed for civilians.

Those are the only two honest answers.  You **** lost ****.  

Do not bother me any more with this bullshti.  Bumping this post will be my response. 

Good Night ****** Who Runs Too Far.

What a **** loser.

1) ****.

2) ****

I gave the honest answers.

If you can find a lie in my words, show me.
.if not, it's time to go back to the point of the article.

 

*Huey » 12 Jun 2025, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2025, 8:34 am

That was easy!  You lied one way or the other.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2025, 8:41 am

*Huey » 12 Jun 2025, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2025, 8:34 am

That was easy!  You lied one way or the other.

 

 

*Huey » 12 Jun 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2025, 8:44 am

You edit my posts, I edit your posts.


 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2025, 8:45 am

*Huey » 12 Jun 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2025, 8:44 am

You edit my posts, I edit your posts.



 

I don't edit your posts...

You edit your posts.

Now post my "lie".