Liberal Forum

*Huey » 13 Jun 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 10:12 am

THat's not an answer.  That is more running from Sep 24.  Are you out of breath yet?  

BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828

That is all you are gonna get.  It's over.

The funny thing is that I've already done so, more than once....in detail, at length.

You continue to refuse to identify the citation to which your question refers.

There's no question who is running...
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 12:10 pm

*Huey » 13 Jun 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 10:12 am

THat's not an answer.  That is more running from Sep 24.  Are you out of breath yet?  

BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828

That is all you are gonna get.  It's over.

The funny thing is that I've already done so, more than once....in detail, at length.

You continue to refuse to identify the citation to which your question refers.

There's no question who is running...
 

 

Now you are back you did..

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 3:31 pm

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:46 pm

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2025, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 2:42 pm

You're still running from the question.....

You should stop doing that, people will assume that you are a ******...

I have already won.  You are on an epic Forrest Gump run avoiding the challenge from last year.

The Sporter was never military combat issue because it was designed for civilian use.

The Sporter is listed on the civilian list because it is designed for civilian use.


 

You clam you have honestly answer it.  Then you agree with the following.

1. The Sporter was not designed for combat and was never issued as a combat weapon.

2.  The Sporter was on the civilian list because it was designed as a civilian.

If you disagree you did not answer the challenge honestly and you are lying claiming you already did.  Quite the catch 22, *******.  Not as smart as you think you are.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2025, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 4:55 pm

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 3:31 pm

You clam you have honestly answer it.  Then you agree with the following.


 

Just post my words...

 

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2025, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 5:21 pm

*Huey » 11 Jun 2025, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2025, 4:58 pm

I did .  You said you already answered it honestly.  If you answered it honestly your must agree that:

1.  The Colt Sporter is not on the military list because it was not designed for combat.

2.  The Colt Sporter is not on the civilian list because it was designed for civilians.

Those are the only two honest answers.  You **** lost ****.  

Do not bother me any more with this bullshti.  Bumping this post will be my response. 

Good Night ****** Who Runs Too Far.

What a **** loser.

1) ****.

2) ****

I gave the honest answers.

If you can find a lie in my words, show me.
.if not, it's time to go back to the point of the article.

 

 

Huey » 01 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 12:33 pm

Take the L.

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

 

@Blackvegetable  

Just to further cement your epic loss on this topic I just sold the 2006 Olympic AR 15 my wife and I inherited from her brother.  I never wanted one because it is nothing more than another semiautomatic.  I have shot expert with the real thing.  It has a rail (google it), hand grip, a laser dot HALO type site, and a hand grip.  I found it heavy and bulky.  We got 700 for it and 200 for the ammo.

Now to put that in perspective to what a real weapon designed for combat costs look below:

 Fully transferable automatic M16 rifles typically cost between $25,000 and $60,000+ in the United States as of 2026, depending on the model, condition, and manufacturer. These NFA-registered machine guns are expensive due to limited supply, with models like the Colt M16A1 or A2 holding high market value.

On this topic consider your *** thoroughly curb stomped.  Sit down in the corner with your dunce hat, STFU concerning this subject, and keep your **** mouth shut. If you wish to discuss in person I will be in DC the weekend of Aug 23rd from Fri afternoon and leaving Tues morning.  Have no fear, in DC I can't carry.

Huey » 15 May 2026, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑

15 May 2026, 6:19 pm

@Blackvegetable  

Just to further cement your epic loss on this topic I just sold the 2006 Olympic AR 15 my wife and I inherited from her brother.  I never wanted one because it is nothing more than another semiautomatic.  I have shot expert with the real thing.  It has a rail (google it), hand grip, a laser dot HALO type site, and a hand grip.  I found it heavy and bulky.  We got 700 for it and 200 for the ammo.

Now to put that in perspective to what a real weapon designed for combat costs look below:

 Fully transferable automatic M16 rifles typically cost between $25,000 and $60,000+ in the United States as of 2026, depending on the model, condition, and manufacturer. These NFA-registered machine guns are expensive due to limited supply, with models like the Colt M16A1 or A2 holding high market value.

On this topic consider your *** thoroughly curb stomped.  Sit down in the corner with your dunce hat, STFU concerning this subject, and keep your **** mouth shut. If you wish to discuss in person I will be in DC the weekend of Aug 23rd from Fri afternoon and leaving Tues morning.  Have no fear, in DC I can't carry.

Why are you going on?


the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
 

Huey » 15 May 2026, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑

15 May 2026, 6:19 pm

@Blackvegetable  

Just to further cement your epic loss on this topic I just sold the 2006 Olympic AR 15 my wife and I inherited from her brother.  I never wanted one because it is nothing more than another semiautomatic.  I have shot expert with the real thing.  It has a rail (google it), hand grip, a laser dot HALO type site, and a hand grip.  I found it heavy and bulky.  We got 700 for it and 200 for the ammo.

Now to put that in perspective to what a real weapon designed for combat costs look below:

 Fully transferable automatic M16 rifles typically cost between $25,000 and $60,000+ in the United States as of 2026, depending on the model, condition, and manufacturer. These NFA-registered machine guns are expensive due to limited supply, with models like the Colt M16A1 or A2 holding high market value.

On this topic consider your *** thoroughly curb stomped.  Sit down in the corner with your dunce hat, STFU concerning this subject, and keep your **** mouth shut. If you wish to discuss in person I will be in DC the weekend of Aug 23rd from Fri afternoon and leaving Tues morning.  Have no fear, in DC I can't carry.

are you staying at the army navy club?

Blackvegetable » 15 May 2026, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑

15 May 2026, 6:23 pm

Why are you going on?

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

Why are you going on?

if it the firearm I sold was truly a weapon  designed for the battlefield I would have gotten tens of thousands of dollars, ROTC.  You are not a smart person.

BuckNaked » 15 May 2026, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑

15 May 2026, 6:35 pm

are you staying at the army navy club?

nah.  Springfield Best Western near the metro.

Huey » 16 May 2026, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 7:51 am

if it the firearm I sold was truly a weapon  designed for the battlefield I would have .

It has NOTHING to do with you.

Blackvegetable » 16 May 2026, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 7:56 am

It has NOTHING to do with you.

if it the firearm I sold was truly a weapon  designed for the battlefield I would have gotten tens of thousands of dollars, ROTC.  You are not a smart person.

Dum Dum, in this case it does.  I see you had TO edit my quote in order to change the context.  A big sign of a liar who is losing.

you really need to stay away from topics where yo have no knowledge or experience.
 

Huey » 16 May 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 8:01 am

if it the firearm I sold was truly a weapon  designed for the battlefield I would 

It has NOTHING to do with you.....it was designed before you were born.

Blackvegetable » 16 May 2026, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 8:38 am

Huey » 16 May 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 8:01 am

if it the firearm I sold was truly a weapon  designed for the battlefield I would have gotten tens of thousands of dollars, ROTC.  You are not a smart person.

Dum Dum, in this case it does.  I see you had TO edit my quote in order to change the context.  A big sign of a liar who is losing.

you really need to stay away from topics where yo have no knowledge or experience.

It has NOTHING to do with you.....it was designed before you were born.

Try that one again with editing the context.  I can do this until you get it right and stop lying.
 

Huey » 16 May 2026, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 8:40 am

Try that one again with editing the context.  I can do this until you get it right and stop lying.

Tiny,

You feel free to ignore the citation.

I presume to do the same with your yapping.


 

Blackvegetable » 16 May 2026, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 8:45 am

Huey » 16 May 2026, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 8:40 am

Try that one again with editing the context.  I can do this until you get it right and stop lying.

Tiny,

You feel free to ignore the citation.

I presume to do the same with your yapping.


 

 

if the firearm I sold was truly a weapon  designed for the battlefield I would have gotten tens of thousands of dollars, ROTC.  You are not a smart person.

Dum Dum, in this case it does.  I see you had TO edit my quote in order to change the context.  A big sign of a liar who is losing.

I completely understand ALL the info at the citation.  Let's see if you do.  Don't run a fairy this time.  


I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off

Huey » 16 May 2026, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 8:48 am

if the firearm I 

And so you rebleat.

 

Blackvegetable » 16 May 2026, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 8:50 am

Huey » 16 May 2026, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 8:48 am

if the firearm I sold was truly a weapon  designed for the battlefield I would have gotten tens of thousands of dollars, ROTC.  You are not a smart person.

Dum Dum, in this case it does.  I see you had TO edit my quote in order to change the context.  A big sign of a liar who is losing.

I completely understand ALL the info at the citation.  Let's see if you do.  Don't run a fairy this time.  


I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off
 

And so you rebleat.

 

 

FIFY., Pus

You have shown:

1.  You do not understand the sources I have provided you.

2.  You have no knowledge or experience on the subject matter.

3.  You are so ignorant on the subject you have to edit posts to change the context in order to attempt to make a point.

Just admit Puss, you have no **** clue what you are talking about.  I accept your surrender.

Huey » 16 May 2026, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 9:01 am

FIFY., Pus

You have shown:

1.  You do not understand the sources I have provided you.

2.  You have no knowledge or experience on the subject matter.

3.  You are so ignorant on the subject you have to edit posts to change the context in order to attempt to make a point.

Just admit Puss, you have no **** clue what you are talking about.  I accept your surrender.

You can assert, repeat and vaguely describe...but it doesn't contradict established fact.



the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

Blackvegetable » 16 May 2026, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 10:42 am

Huey » 16 May 2026, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 9:01 am

FIFY., Pus

You have shown:

1.  You do not understand the sources I have provided you.

2.  You have no knowledge or experience on the subject matter.

3.  You are so ignorant on the subject you have to edit posts to change the context in order to attempt to make a point.

Just admit Puss, you have no **** clue what you are talking about.  I accept your surrender.

You can assert, repeat and vaguely describe...but it doesn't contradict established fact.



the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

 

 

Huey » 01 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 12:33 pm

Take the L.

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

 

When yo answer those questions you will show you understand the source you getting that citation from.  The reason you have run away from those questions is you now if you answer them honestly you entire argument is squashed.

I tell ya, Puss, this has been epic years long curb stomping of you.  I do do enjoy it.  

Huey » 16 May 2026, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 12:29 pm

When yo answer those questions you will show 

:rofl:  

We're gonna need that rule...

And the one about disregarding citations..

Blackvegetable » 16 May 2026, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 2:14 pm

 

We're gonna need that rule...

And the one about disregarding citations..

You are disregarding the entire source of your citation.

You will have to try that again with the edit:

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off

Huey » 16 May 2026, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2026, 2:21 pm

You are disregarding the entire source of your citation.

You will have to try that again with the edit:

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off

My only "challenge" is to demonstrate the truth of what I've asserted.


I have done so. Unambigously.