are you happy now?
It is a tool specifically developed to do exactly that.JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 05 Sep 2024, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑ are you happy now?
https://www.npr.org/2022/05/31/11020975 ... an-old-fri
The AR-15, which is the weapon used by the gunman at Robb Elementary, is designed to blow targets apart. It's a weapon built for war. And when fired into a human adult body, its bullets travel with such fierce velocity that they can decapitate a person, or leave a body looking "like a grenade went off in there," as Peter Rhee, a trauma surgeon at the University of Arizona, told Wired. The carnage the weapon leaves behind has become a signature of school shootings and other mass shootings across the country. Unfortunately, Diaz has now seen first-hand what such a weapon can do to children with small bones and limbs, which made the process of identifying them even more agonizing.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 05 Sep 2024, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑ are you happy now?
https://www.npr.org/2022/05/31/11020975 ... an-old-fri
The AR-15, which is the weapon used by the gunman at Robb Elementary, is designed to blow targets apart. It's a weapon built for war. And when fired into a human adult body, its bullets travel with such fierce velocity that they can decapitate a person, or leave a body looking "like a grenade went off in there," as Peter Rhee, a trauma surgeon at the University of Arizona, told Wired. The carnage the weapon leaves behind has become a signature of school shootings and other mass shootings across the country. Unfortunately, Diaz has now seen first-hand what such a weapon can do to children with small bones and limbs, which made the process of identifying them even more agonizing.
BV's Sporter Loss https: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2024, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑ It is a tool specifically developed to do exactly that.
You're a moron, Zeet.....Zeets2 » 05 Sep 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ Fact: There were 306 children 11 years old or younger killed by guns in 2022.
Fact: There were well over a million abortions that took place last year.
So tell me.
Which Supreme Court decision was more deadly to children, especially minority children? The Heller decision or Roe v. Wade?
Isn't it a fact that the most dangerous place on earth for a child today is inside its mother?
But you won't even consider the absurdity of such a distinction comparing the two, will you?
You don't stop gun deaths by taking away guns from law-abiding citizens any more than you would stop drunk drivers by taking away cars owned by sober drivers!
Get it through your liberal head that CRIMINALS DO NOT FOLLOW THE LAW, and they will ALWAYS be able to obtain a gun no matter WHAT laws you put in place! All you'd do is prevent law-abiding citizens from having the ability to defend themselves!
What "loss"?
tell that to the dead children and their relatives.*Huey » 05 Sep 2024, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑ No, the Colt Sporter, the original semi automatic was not designed war. You are confusing it with the M 16 weapon, which is a select fire automatic or burst weapon.
Next, the weapon is questionable for battle and the military round used is not that powerful.
https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-arm ... r%20ranges.
Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2024, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ What "loss"?
All the evidence I need to prove I am correct is right here....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... e_variants List of Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle variants
How many rifles?
this got posted in the wrong thread, why?
There are many weapons that will kill children. BUT, you wish to ban ALL firearms so it is a moot point if you falsely believe the weapon used was a weapon of war.JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 05 Sep 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ tell that to the dead children and their relatives.
Because BV told a fib on this thread.
Civilians have no use or business owning weapons. One dead dead civilian from one gun is one too many in any modern society.*Huey » 05 Sep 2024, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Their area many weapons that will kill children. BUT, wish to ban ALL firearms so it is a moot point if you falsely believe the weapon used was a weapon of war.
your thoughts are useless.*Huey » 05 Sep 2024, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Their area many weapons that will kill children. BUT, wish to ban ALL firearms so it is a moot point if you falsely believe the weapon used was a weapon of war.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 05 Sep 2024, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Civilians have no use or business owning weapons. One dead dead civilian from one gun is one too many in any modern society.
Can't wait.JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 05 Sep 2024, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ your thoughts are useless.
you own these deaths
you will be judged
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 04 Sep 2024, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't give a crap about your thoughts and prayers.
How many more kids must die?
I don't need your validation to win.*Huey » 05 Sep 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Just tell the class, at that link, which list the AR 15 Sporter appears on, military or civilian.
And then tell me which years the Colt Sporter was standard issue to grunts in combat units.
Then you win.
Because @*HooooeyVagina has issues, like..
Given that you rarely provide evidence for your claims, then it's safe to say that you don't know the meaning of the word.