Liberal Forum

FJB » 42 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

42 minutes ago

bring it on bitch boy, I dare ya. Democrats will lose yet another civil war

Martial law and you will be urinating in your Bat Girl underooos

BooRadley » Today, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:55 am

I'll explain it to you...

You want the government to confiscate guns.

So...
You go to someone's house and demand the owners guns.
He claims he has none.
How do you proceed?

Move on to the next house?

You've already stated if they don't hand over the guns you shut off the water and electricity.
Are you serious?

You actually want to ignore the constitution and then the rule of law?

Another point..
What if someone collects guns and they're very valuable?
Do they lose their guns too?

Explain all this

Martial Law
We have the tech to look inside your house and walls. We ill see the guns
If they are there, we are taking them
Scrub the USA free of GUNS
Very serious
Yes
ALL GUNS CONFISCATED

Smelt it all down and build a giant memorial to all those killed by GUN NUTTERS
 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Martial law and you will be urinating in your Bat Girl underooos

So you are going to try and take away guns?

FJB » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

So you are going to try and take away guns?

I hope the authorities do it.
 

FJB » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

So you are going to try and take away guns?

You will be urinating in your Bat Girl underooos
I know you wear Bat Girl underooos
 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I hope the authorities do it.

they would never go against the Constitution asshole

FJB » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

they would never go against the Constitution asshole

the world is rapidly changing.
Global Warming, etc. It is time.
 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Yesterday, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:22 pm

Abortion is a medical procedure between a woman and her Doctor. Simple removal of tissue.
on the other hand...
a point blank execution from a stranger is avoidable with the absence of guns.

Turn in your guns and be done with it.

Thank you, no.
I don't ascribe to the belief that 
A) Criminals would EVER be willing to give up their guns or be unable to obtain more if they were confiscated
B) Law-abiding citizens who own guns pose any danger to the public.

So answer me this.
What is it that stopped the 14 year old shooter from surrendering to the SRO police officers?
Was it:
A) He either ran out of ammo or was finished killing those he wanted to kill
B) Was it the fact that the armed SRO officer was about to shoot him dead WITH HIS GUN that forced him to surrender?

Do you think the kid would have simply continued his murderous rampage by shooting the officer if he was unarmed and then continue shooting more kids?
Seems to me that the fact that he was armed STOPPED THE MURDERER IMMEDIATELY!

And who is it that has said she wants to get armed police out of our schools?
Well, that would be Kamala, who I suspect you will be voting for to lead this country in November, won't you?

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

the world is rapidly changing.
Global Warming, etc. It is time.

and democrats will lose again

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

I hope the authorities do it.
 

I am sure you do. You march to a social consensus drummer. Following suggestions life isn't self evident imprisons your brain to mind ideas life doesn't exist without believing anything else is possible.

You question your self evident time occupying space every day and your social narrative seeks to eliminate anyone saying life doesn't exceed time adapting your position ancestrally here.

Zeets2 » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

Thank you, no.
I don't ascribe to the belief that 
A) Criminals would EVER be willing to give up their guns or be unable to obtain more if they were confiscated
B) Law-abiding citizens who own guns pose any danger to the public.

So answer me this.
What is it that stopped the 14 year old shooter from surrendering to the SRO police officers?
Was it:
A) He either ran out of ammo or was finished killing those he wanted to kill
B) Was it the fact that the armed SRO officer was about to shoot him dead WITH HIS GUN that forced him to surrender?

Do you think the kid would have simply continued his murderous rampage by shooting the officer if he was unarmed and then continue shooting more kids?
Seems to me that the fact that he was armed STOPPED THE MURDERER IMMEDIATELY!

And who is it that has said she wants to get armed police out of our schools?
Well, that would be Kamala, who I suspect you will be voting for to lead this country in November, won't you?

Police and authorities will have guns and civilians will not.
No need for Police in schools
Schools are for education, not crime scenes.
The kids will flourish knowing they will not be splattered all over the walls and be a statistic.

I admire David Hogg, do you?
 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

38 minutes ago

Martial Law
We have the tech to look inside your house and walls. We will see the guns
If they are there, we are taking them
Scrub the USA free of GUNS
Very serious
Yes
ALL GUNS CONFISCATED

Smelt it all down and build a giant memorial to CHILDREN all those killed by GUN NUTTERS

So you want tech to look inside your house?

Do you take away from gun collectors that own rare, expensive guns?
 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

38 minutes ago

Martial Law
We have the tech to look inside your house and walls. We will see the guns
If they are there, we are taking them
Scrub the USA free of GUNS
Very serious
Yes
ALL GUNS CONFISCATED

Smelt it all down and build a giant memorial to CHILDREN all those killed by GUN NUTTERS

So you want the government to go door to door for your guns?
How about the consititution?
And on top of that if the people don't hand over their guns you want to shut off their water and electricity?
What if it's the middle of winter and there's children in the house?
 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

Police and authorities will have guns and civilians will not.
No need for Police in schools
Schools are for education, not crime scenes.
The kids will flourish knowing they will not be splattered all over the walls and be a statistic.

I admire David Hogg, do you?

So you'd have been fine with that school not having any armed SRO officers like the one who stopped the 14 year old shooter cold, huh?

Care to take a guess on how many more kids would have been shot and killed at that school if you had your way?
And no, I DON'T support the activism of David Hogg.  
His recipe would result in MANY more innocent deaths at the hands of mentally deranged killers.
Which is exactly what we saw at the school on Monday.

Zeets2 » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

So you'd have been fine with that school not having any armed SRO officers like the one who stopped the 14 year old shooter cold, huh?

Care to take a guess on how many more kids would have been shot and killed at that school if you had your way?
And no, I DON'T support the activism of David Hogg.  
His recipe would result in MANY more innocent deaths at the hands of mentally deranged killers.
Which is exactly what we saw at the school on Monday.

Harris is on record saying there should not be officers in schools...

Thank God there was in GA...
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:39 pm

You're a moron, Zeet.....

Seriously

Then why can't you dispute the facts I've stated, dickhead?
Shouldn't it be easy for such a wise sage as yourself to win over the factual statements of someone you consider a moron with an intelligent argument?
So why can't you, ******?

It sure says a lot about that **** education of yours that you're so proud of!      
 

Zeets2 » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Then why can't you dispute the facts I've stated, dickhead?
Shouldn't it be easy for such a wise sage as yourself to win over the factual statements of someone you consider a moron with an intelligent argument?
So why can't you, ******?

It sure says a lot about that **** education of yours that you're so proud of!    

When you get done mangling them, they are no longer facts.

Zeets2 » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

So you'd have been fine with that school not having any armed SRO officers like the one who stopped the 14 year old shooter cold, huh?

Care to take a guess on how many more kids would have been shot and killed at that school if you had your way?
And no, I DON'T support the activism of David Hogg.  
His recipe would result in MANY more innocent deaths at the hands of mentally deranged killers.
Which is exactly what we saw at the school on Monday.

the one who stopped the 14 year old shooter cold, huh?

not "cold", exactly.

The kid surrendered, after killing 4 and injuring 9.

BooRadley » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Harris is on record saying there should not be officers in schools...

Thank God there was in GA...

And what we witnessed on Monday shoots the **** out of her argument!

Is there any doubt even among liberals that many more kids and teachers would have been shot and killed if it wasn't for the ARMED SRO officer who stopped him?

I hope Trump brings this up in their debate, and from there goes on to make a campaign commercial SHOWING her making that statement, alongside a video of that 14 year old shooter being perp-walked by an armed guard into a police car amid the mayhem and death he caused!
 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

not "cold", exactly.

The kid surrendered, after killing 4 and injuring 9.

And what was it that MADE him surrender, moron?

Could it have been the fact that he was about to be shot in the face?