you people always make excuses and bend the definition*Huey » 04 Sep 2024, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ That is all well and good but before getting too deep into it lets wait and see what type of firearm was used.
If it is a semi automatic sports rifle, by definition, it is not an assault rifle. THat is why those who tell you what to think popularized the term "assault' weapon".
bury it
people have a fighting chance against a baseball bat.RebelGator » 04 Sep 2024, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Would you feel better if they were clubbed to death with a baseball bat?
It's not a gun problem, it's a mental health problem.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 04 Sep 2024, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ you people always make excuses and bend the definition
I said GUN BAN, what part can you not comprehend? GUN or BAN?*Huey » 04 Sep 2024, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ That is all well and good but before getting too deep into it lets wait and see what type of firearm was used.
If it is a semi automatic sports rifle, by definition, it is not an assault rifle. THat is why those who tell you what to think popularized the term "assault' weapon".
GUN BAN*Huey » 04 Sep 2024, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Definition of an assault rifle:The U.S. Army defines assault rifles as "short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges."[18] In this strict definition, a firearm must have at least the following characteristics to be considered an assault rifle:[2][3][4]Rifles that meet most of these criteria, but not all, are not assault rifles according to the U.S. Army's definition. For example:
- It must be capable of selective fire.
- It must have an intermediate-power cartridge: more power than a pistol but less than a standard rifle or battle rifle; examples of intermediate cartridges are the 7.92×33mm Kurz, the 7.62×39mm and 5.56×45mm NATO.
- Its ammunition must be supplied from a detachable box magazine.[5]
- It must have an effective range of at least 300 metres (330 yards).
- Select-fire rifles such as the FN FAL, M14, and H&K G3 main battle rifles are not assault rifles; they fire full-powered rifle cartridges.
- Semi-automatic-only rifles like the Colt AR-15 are not assault rifles; they do not have select-fire capabilities.
- Semi-automatic-only rifles with fixed magazines like the SKS are not assault rifles; they do not have detachable box magazines and are not capable of automatic fire.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 04 Sep 2024, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I said GUN BAN, what part can you not comprehend? GUN or BAN?
WIth over 400 million guns in circulation please explain how this ban will work.
RebelGator » 04 Sep 2024, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑ You better stick to Vanity Fair magazines.....oops, I forgot.....you were corrected on that, also.
.you were corrected on that, also
Still sorting Assault Rifle from Machine Gun from Main Battle Rifle?*Huey » 04 Sep 2024, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑ WIth over 400 million guns in circulation please explain how this ban will work.
And like the other nitwit please learn the nomenclature.
Address that to someone who made an issue of it.*Huey » 04 Sep 2024, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ That is all well and good but before getting too deep into it lets wait and see what type of firearm was used.
If it is a semi automatic sports rifle, by definition, it is not an assault rifle. THat is why those who tell you what to think popularized the term "assault' weapon".
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 04 Sep 2024, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ you people always make excuses and bend the definition
Yup. Some day you will learn. But, if you wish to discuss this go to the link in my sug.Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2024, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Still sorting Assault Rifle from Machine Gun from Main Battle Rifle?
You were stalking me, Suggie...*Huey » 04 Sep 2024, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Yup. Some day you will learn. But, if you wish to discuss this go to the link in my sug.
I accept yet another of your concessions.*Huey » 04 Sep 2024, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, you finally understand the difference in design.
Kudos, I’m proud of you.
yours was already accepted:
You are not a credible source.*Huey » 04 Sep 2024, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ yours was already accepted:
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828