Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:06 am

How about this Mad Cow?
 

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:40 am

Isn't this the definition of "Fraud"?

From March 2021 to September 2022, Trump’s campaign paid 2M Document Management and Imaging LLC over $4.6 million from its recount fund, reporting all of these disbursements as “Recount: Research Consulting.” In other words, Trump was using his campaign’s recount fund to shoulder legal expenses that had absolutely nothing to do with recounts or election contests.

The rest is drivel - but this ^ is a serious charge, and it DOES smell like the Orange Dream's shenanigans. But inquiring minds are not satisfied with this cursory retelling. 

YOU say 2M LLC was being paid for matters other than services related to the recount. YOU say that. Well, your source, whatever it is, says that.

But I'm skeptical.

What your OP owed the reader and did not deliver was an accounting of what those funds DID pay for. Not just whom they were paid to, but why they were paid - what services NOT RELATED TO THE RECOUNT those monies recompensed. 

Incomplete OP, lots of hyperbole, I give it a C. For extra credit and to bring your grade up, you can tell the class what those funds WERE used for, if not for services related to the recount. 
 

Cannonpointer » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

For extra credit and to bring your grade up, you can tell the class what those funds WERE used for, if not for services related to the recount.

You see this ^^^. If he even read this far into your response, this is when he will turn it around on you with an avalanche of questions and demands. 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:40 am

Isn't this the definition of "Fraud"?

From March 2021 to September 2022, Trump’s campaign paid 2M Document Management and Imaging LLC over $4.6 million from its recount fund, reporting all of these disbursements as “Recount: Research Consulting.” In other words, Trump was using his campaign’s recount fund to shoulder legal expenses that had absolutely nothing to do with recounts or election contests.

  That’s certainly not what Trump’s campaign told potential donors their money would be used for while asking them, relentlessly, to help “Stop the Steal.” His fundraising messages referred to an “election defense fund” and asked supporters to contribute to “DEFEND the Election,” “finish the fight,” and “FIGHT[ ] BACK to defend the integrity of this Election.” 

https://campaignlegal.org/update/trumps ... egulations

Rubes contributed at least $250 million to this effort....while Grifty knew all along that he had lost, fair & square.

The names of donors should be made public so that Patriots can shame them at will.

I did a quick dive into your OP, and it appears that your information comes from this source: 

https://newstracs.com/how-the-largest-t ... 024/06/04/

You might have been drinking downriver, as is your wont - but that is your actual source. 

And in the introduction to her work, Wendy Siegelman says:

Note: For this story I analyzed tens of thousands of records from the Federal Elections Commission database (such as this set of disbursements) and cross referenced recipients to get a fuller picture of what they were paid cumulatively by the largest PACs supporting Trump. 

I have not gone further to see whether his mission expanded to include the campaign itself, but at least on its face, what you are complaining about was done by PACs and not by Trump. Trump and the PACs have legal firewalls between them. 

Say it isn't so, Joe. 
 
 
 

Vegas » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

You see this ^^^. If he even read this far into your response, this is when he will turn it around on you with an avalanche of questions and demands.

Gosh, I would hate for that to happen.

I cannot IMAGINE how I might respond...  

Cannonpointer » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Gosh, I would hate for that to happen.

I cannot IMAGINE how I might respond...

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:14 pm

Not if I don't look at it.

Social Identities honor artificial intelligence rather than their own brain navigating time adapting uniquely alive daily since conceived as an ever changing form that cannot create or destroy the energy that balances the universe exactly as evolving forward now.

You two both defy the natural process you exist in daily. Ironic New world Order promises each person one can own, won, now tomorrow to each ancestor saving humanity daily.