Liberal Forum

ConsRule » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

33 minutes ago

I didn't make the OP, *******.  Keep up or shut the **** up.

all you MAGA morons look alike.

maineman » Today, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:46 pm

When have I ever been unable to define a woman, cocksucker?

You just spew illterate **** like verbal diarrhea.
 

Instead of defining woman and proving me wrong, you squall liek the bitch your mama raised and ask a rhetorical question.

I'd say you just answered whether you can define woman, fruitcake. You cannot, and you will not.

If you even TRY to define woman - which I predict against, you'll say almost certainly say something retarded, likely using the word woman in the definition of woman, because at heart you're a woman, woman. 

To define woman properly, you would have to take a **** on your own previous statements and positions - which is what makes you a bitch that cannot even define woman, much less present yourself as competent to speak about the thing you cannot define. 

You **** skifooza.

ConsRule » Today, 6:24 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:24 pm

Nothing in the OP said anything different.

The thread title implies it. 

It would be like a thread title saying, "I predict Columbus will sail for Spain and discover Hispaniola." 

Some just MIGHT comment than in fourteen hundred ninety two...
 
 

Cannonpointer » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Instead of defining woman and proving me wrong, you squall liek the bitch your mama raised and ask a rhetorical question.

I'd say you just answered whether you can define woman, fruitcake. You cannot, and you will not.

If you even TRY to define woman - which I predict against, you'll say almost certainly say something retarded, likely using the word woman in the definition of woman, because at heart you're a woman, woman. 

To define woman properly, you would have to take a **** on your own previous statements and positions - which is what makes you a bitch that cannot even define woman, much less present yourself as competent to speak about the thing you cannot define. 

You **** skifooza.

A woman has a vagina and an XX chromosome. 

And I have NEVER said anything to the contrary, admitted cocksucker.

maineman » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

A woman has a vagina and an XX chromosome. 

And I have NEVER said anything to the contrary, admitted cocksucker.

What a woman HAS is not a definition, you fruitcake. What a woman IS was the challenge. But I can see you tried. 

So you are ADMITTING that a woman is an adult human female, and that a female is characterized by xx chromosomes and the primary sexual characteristics of mammary glands and vaginas, it appears.

In which case, you are ALSO admitting that anything WITHOUT those attributes is NOT a woman and has no business in women's restrooms or showers and no right to demand we go along with their misogynistic woman-face gaslighting.

Or, are you are admitting that you're a misogynistic creep who knows the difference and STILL wants to deprive women of the safety, dignity, and security that they have known from time out of mind in this country? 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

What a woman HAS is not a definition, you fruitcake. What a woman IS was the challenge. But I can see you tried. 

So you are ADMITTING that a woman is an adult human female, and that a female is characterized by xx chromosomes and the primary sexual characteristics of mammary glands and vaginas, it appears.

In which case, you are ALSO admitting that anything WITHOUT those attributes is NOT a woman and therefore has no right to access women's restrooms or showers and no right to demand we go along with their misogynistic woman-face gaslighting.

Or, are you are admitting that you're a misogynistic creep who knows the difference and STILL wants to deprive women of the safety, dignity, and security that they have known from time out of mind in this country?

If some transgendered man is willing to have his balls cut off, his dick cut off and tucked inside his abdomen, have silicone breast implants, and wear skirts and high heels, I have no problem with that person going into the ladies' room.  But, I would leave the acceptance of that practice to the ladies in this world... I know I wouldn't care either way if they came into the men's room.  Obviously, you would.
 

maineman » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

If some transgendered man is willing to have his balls cut off,

That is not what you have defended. You have defended intact males entering women's spaces. Are you denying this?

Cannonpointer » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

That is not what you have defended. You have defended intact males entering women's spaces. Are you denying this?

absolutely.

find a post where I defended intact males going into ladies rooms.

or apologize.

maineman » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

absolutely.

find a post where I defended intact males going into ladies rooms.

or apologize.

Just having you on record denying that intact males - however they dress or comport in woman-face - have no business in women's toilets and showers would be WORTH the apology that you do not deserve and will not receive. 

I'm gonna go another way. Hide and watch.

Cannonpointer » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Just having you on record denying that intact males - however they dress or comport in woman-face - have no business in women's toilets and showers would be WORTH the apology that you do not deserve and will not receive. 

I'm gonna go another way. Hide and watch.

wipe the jizz off your chin on the way out.  cocksucker.

maineman » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

wipe the jizz off your chin on the way out.  cocksucker.

Your mama.

By the way, I argued with my brother yesterday, and when he said something this ^ stupid, I responded, "Our mama."

To give you an ideer how dum he is, I had to explain it to him. 
 
PS check the pinned thread.

Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2024, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2024, 1:01 pm

You asked my point.

My point is that they didn't "backfire".

Idiot.

DIDN'T BACKFIRE ?

HA!!  Every Indictment, EVERY Trial, and EVERY Conviction resulted in an IMPROVEMENT in Trumps poll numbers before Biden exited the race ( back then they allowed the REAL numbers to be reported because they WANTED Biden OUT )... NOW, with Kamala as the Nominee, the Democrat Money is trying to CREATE a NEW "BS" REALITY, that Kamala is winning... and ALL of the "Fake News Media" wont even use the legit polling outfits who insist on being true and accurate (like Rasmussen), because they refuse to fall in line with the Democrat propaganda PUSH... when they KNOW it's all Democrat Propaganda and BS... funded by MILLIONS $$$ of rich elite Democrat money !!

Well... before Biden dropped out... POLL after Poll showed that America DISAPPROVED of Kamala even more Joe... and NOW?  Everything has CHANGED?  I doubt it !!

The Democrat Party Machine just wants to create a PERCEPTION that Kamala has a chance... so they can try to STEAL the election like they did in 2020... BUT, THIS TIME... MANY states that permitted ballot drop boxes in 2020 are ENDING the FIASCO... Poll watchers are volunteering all over the country... and ballots MUST be verified BY SIGNATURE:

"All states require voters to provide valid signatures on their absentee/mail-in ballot return documents. Thirty-two states require election workers to match a voter’s signature on ballot return documents with the signature on record for that voter."

Recently courts have determined that the signatures used MUST be verified against the official "signature on record for that voter"... which was NOT the case in 2020 !...   AND THEN, add to that... the FACT that 20-30% of Blacks, and 40-50% of Latinos SUPPORT TRUMP... EVEN the inner cities are going to be HARDER to STEAL, by the Corrupt Democrats !!