The hunt is on. 100,000 Greenies to anyone who can put the lie to this lying-*** Frank Burns homo.maineman » 07 Sep 2024, 9:52 pm » wrote: ↑absolutely.Cannonpointer » 07 Sep 2024, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑You have defended intact males entering women's spaces. Are you denying this?
find a post where I defended intact males going into ladies rooms.
or apologize.
FOUND ONE STATEMENTCannonpointer » 07 Sep 2024, 10:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Has announced that he OPPOSES trannies using women's cans and showers!
The hunt is on. 100,000 Greenies to anyone who can put the lie to this lying-*** Frank Burns homo.
I know the search feature is down, but you can go to his profile (don't touch the walls - nig jizz), click on his digest, and BUST HIS LYING *** OUT for a hundred k and the glory of outing and routing a liver-lipped weakling.
That is all.
That is the statement that led to his lie.righteous » 07 Sep 2024, 10:11 pm » wrote: ↑ FOUND ONE STATEMENT
HE'S A TRUE TRANSBOY
If some transgendered man is willing to have his balls cut off, his dick cut off and tucked inside his abdomen, have silicone breast implants, and wear skirts and high heels, I have no problem with that person going into the ladies' room. But, I would leave the acceptance of that practice to the ladies in this world... I know I wouldn't care either way if they came into the men's room.
Just in case he tries to lie that he was referring to only those men who have been altered, here he specifies that he is talking about intact males (emphasis mine):maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑And I agree with you on many of your issues. I don't like the whole athletic thing. I don't like the prison thing. The rest room thing is a bit trickier for me. If it is a transgendered woman dressed as a man, I don't think that women would be very comfortable with that person strolling into the ladies room. If it is a transgendered man dressed as a woman, I cannot imagine they are going in there to get laid, and I don't think you have a lot of hard evidence that suggests that men in dresses are wantonly raping women in restrooms.Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2024, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Every legal protection, misogynist.
It does this by allowing men into previously sex-segregated spaces.
Define transgendered or stop talking about it.
So long as "transgendered" rests on a subjective claim, it is a meaningless term. Believe it or not, some male sexual predators will tell a fib to get access to fresh victims.
Putting men in prison cells with women is against the Geneva Conventions and other treaties to which we are signatory and is considered a crime against humanity under the laws of the Hague, which we helped to draft.
Did you have a problem with Donald Trump parading through the dressing room of beauty pageant contestants?
I disagree with your statement that it strips EVERY protection away from WOMEN. My daughter doesn't shower at the YWCA. My daughter isn't in a prison cell. My daughter DOES carry mace in her purse at all times and has done so at the direction of her Dad since she was in high school. My daughter has not been stripped of EVERY protection against male violence.
Face it. Your screed was imprecise and sloppy and you don't have the balls to simply admit it.
He is admitting that he is talking about MEN - not about those who've had their junk cut off.maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ In your words... How does making accommodations for transgendered citizens cause the removal of EVERY protection women have from the propensity of men to commit sexual violence against them? What does a transgendered citizen in some restroom or some high school gymnasium or even some prison cell have to do with other heterosexual men committing sexual violence against women anywhere else in the country?
maineman » 05 Aug 2024, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑ The horrors! I STILL disagree, as I always have, with biological males competing in women's sporting events. I have never "allowed" that sort of behavior, and yet, that issue alone will NEVER be enough to have me vote for a **** rapist felonious, incurious, clown. My wife and daughter - and all of us -are put at much greater risk by climate change than some guy in a dress squatting to pee in a ladies' room.
Cannonpointer » 07 Sep 2024, 10:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay, I caught the cocksucker. I just went to my own notifications, selected his account, and caught him defending intact males entering women's toilets:
Just in case he tries to lie that he was referring to only those men who have been altered, here he specifies that he is talking about intact males (emphasis mine):
He is admitting that he is talking about MEN - not about those who've had their junk cut off.
@maineman - you're busted.
Yeah, yeah, Major Burns. I do not expect the guy who told the lie to admit the lie was busted out.maineman » 07 Sep 2024, 10:39 pm » wrote: ↑ you need to be able to read better. And I recommend you find some other issue to argue with me about. This one is really LOW on my list of issues that I give a **** about.
Cannonpointer » 07 Sep 2024, 10:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, yeah, Major Burns. I do not expect the guy who told the lie to admit the lie was busted out.
You claimed you never defended men in women's toilets. I showed you defending men in women's toilets.
Twice.
Quickly.
In the second bust out, I quoted you defending "some guy in a dress, squatting to pee."
I will trust the dear reader to decide whether you defended it, son. You've raised a secondary issue.maineman » 07 Sep 2024, 10:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I never defended it.
Like I said, you need to learn how to read as well as you suck cocks
Cannonpointer » 07 Sep 2024, 11:10 pm » wrote: ↑ I will trust the dear reader to decide whether you defended it, son. You've raised a secondary issue.
What evidence do you have that I suck cocks well?
To hear you tell it, you don't have any destitute mexican immigrants living in your area. Where are you getting your information?
And here is ANOTHER example of you defending trannies, fruitcake:maineman » 07 Sep 2024, 11:13 pm » wrote: ↑ are you denying that you admitted to sucking not one, but two different cocks>?
maineman » 06 Oct 2023, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I think service is an honorable calling. I think that the military is the muscular arm of American foreign policy, and, while I don't always agree with they way it has been used in the past, that was oddly enough, always part of the mystique for me.... I was pledged to do my job to the best of my ability regardless of the circumstances and took great pride in doing so.
While we are on the topic, I have addressed this bit of humor with you before. You were too stupid to get it - JUST AS YOU WERE TOO STUPID TO CATCH THE JOKE in the post you are responding to here.^maineman » 07 Sep 2024, 11:13 pm » wrote: ↑ are you denying that you admitted to sucking not one, but two different cocks>?
maineman » 31 Jul 2023, 7:45 pm » wrote: ↑sleeping with over a hundred women...Cannonpointer » 31 Jul 2023, 7:13 pm » wrote: ↑ I bragged about sleeping with over a hundred women.
I was lying - but it set up the punchline.
You didn't get the joke, because you ARE a punchline. A weak, sniveling beta who votes and argues against the interests of Maine's and America's women and children - as cucks are wont.
but also sucking two dicks.
you really can't **** the gay away, no matter how hard you try.
***
100KCannonpointer » 07 Sep 2024, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Has announced that he OPPOSES trannies using women's cans and showers!
The hunt is on. 100,000 Greenies to anyone who can put the lie to this lying-*** Frank Burns homo.
I know the search feature is down, but you can go to his profile (don't touch the walls - nig jizz), click on his digest, and BUST HIS LYING *** OUT for a hundred k.
That is all.
He's a DEI hire.LowIQTrash » 08 Sep 2024, 1:17 am » wrote: ↑ 100K
Ronjul the Curry NigNog can't program a proper search function...sounds typical of Infosys hires
The Unlettered Mopboy fails to recognize the implications of his statement. A dick in a dress entering a women’s restroom regardless of if he rapes a woman or not is in violation of woman’s privacy and women’s rights.Cannonpointer » 07 Sep 2024, 10:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay, I caught the cocksucker. I just went to my own notifications, selected his account, and caught him defending intact males entering women's toilets:
Just in case he tries to lie that he was referring to only those men who have been altered, here he specifies that he is talking about intact males (emphasis mine):
He is admitting that he is talking about MEN - not about those who've had their junk cut off.
@maineman - you're busted.
Cannonpointer » 07 Sep 2024, 10:34 pm » wrote: ↑ And before you lie again, @maineman - here's another:
It amounts to defense when you say you would ignore the occurrence in favor of playing Candy Crush.maineman » 08 Sep 2024, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑ again... there is no "defense" there. There is merely a prioritization of importance.
I don't like murderers. I don't like shoplifters. I think putting perpetrators of the former in prison is more important.
I don't like climate change. I don't like the idea of men in dresses using ladies' rooms. I think the former is a greater threat to society.
See how that works?
DeezerShoove » 08 Sep 2024, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ It amounts to defense when you say you would ignore the occurrence in favor of playing Candy Crush.
On your watch apparently dicks would be a'hangin' in the ladies' shower whilst you score big on your cell phone.
I've done it over and over but nobody wants to use how I came about debunking every reality of humanity so far. Natural evolving doesn't stop because one species invented the idea of multi-verse, parallel universes, wormholes, time travel. anything else is possible life exceeds adapting as displaced daily.Cannonpointer » 07 Sep 2024, 10:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Has announced that he OPPOSES trannies using women's cans and showers!
The hunt is on. 100,000 Greenies to anyone who can put the lie to this lying-*** Frank Burns homo.
I know the search feature is down, but you can go to his profile (don't touch the walls - nig jizz), click on his digest, and BUST HIS LYING *** OUT for a hundred k and the glory of outing and routing a liver-lipped weakling.
That is all.
maineman » 07 Sep 2024, 10:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I never defended it.
Like I said, you need to learn how to read as well as you suck cocks