Liberal Forum

righteous » 08 Sep 2024, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 5:54 am

The Unlettered Mopboy fails to recognize the implications of his statement. A dick in a dress entering a women’s restroom regardless of if he rapes a woman or not is in violation of woman’s privacy and women’s rights. 

I have to wonder if Mopboy himself puts the dress on and frequents women’s restrooms being the defender he is of the bizarre behavior

He's a sleaze. His position, I assure you, is that he didn't DEFEND it. He merely said this lived as a worse threat than that.

And he is stupid enough to giggle to himself that such statements do not constitute defending it. He defended it through whataboutism, introducing an unrelated topic to diminish the importance of the thing he was defending. 

"I didn't DEFEND it," he will insist, "I just said that it's not such a big deal."

And yes, he is intellectually dishonest and immature enough to believe that is not a defense. 
 

maineman » 08 Sep 2024, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 7:02 am

again... there is no "defense" there.  There is merely a prioritization of importance.

@righteous  - can I call them? The very NEXT post in the thread.

I responded to you through my notifications, and then I scrolled the thread.

I see through this boy like used Neutrogena. 
 

maineman » 07 Sep 2024, 10:39 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2024, 10:39 pm

you need to be able to read better.  And I recommend you find some other issue to argue with me about.  This one is really LOW on my list of issues that I give a **** about.

This is what libs do when they are caught lying. They trivialize it  change the subject. OdetoJoy and XO did the same thing when they were caught lying.       

Vegas » 08 Sep 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 10:42 am

This is what libs do when they are caught lying. They trivialize it  change the subject. OdetoJoy and XO did the same thing when they were caught lying.     

I don't lie.  I have never defended transgender guys going into ladies' rooms.  I merely opined that it was just not really very high on my list of items to lose sleep over.  As for you, you have my permission to get so butthurt about it you give yourself a stroke.

maineman » 08 Sep 2024, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 10:50 am

I don't lie.  I have never defended transgender guys going into ladies' rooms. 

He literally just busted you. Seriously, wtf is wrong with you? He spelled it out in your **** words. 

God man. 

Vegas » 08 Sep 2024, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 10:52 am

He literally just busted you. Seriously, wtf is wrong with you? He spelled it out in your **** words. 

God man.

Saying I don't give a **** about it is not defending it.

What about that doesn't register in your lizard brain?

maineman » 08 Sep 2024, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 11:01 am

Saying I don't give a **** about it is not defending it.

What about that doesn't register in your lizard brain?

It's the same thing. Child abuse is everybody's business. No matter how small or large, indirectly or directly. Everybody in society has an obligation to protect children. Period. 

Vegas » 08 Sep 2024, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 11:05 am

It's the same thing. Child abuse is everybody's business. No matter how small or large, indirectly or directly. Everybody in society has an obligation to protect children. Period.

No... it is not the same thing.  

And I think it is funny that a member of a political party that routinely wants to cut WIC funding claims protecting children is anything he actually cares about.  You care about YOUR kids and your FRIEND'S kids, but you could give a **** if some poor black or hispanic kid is malnourished.

maineman » 08 Sep 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 11:10 am

No... it is not the same thing.  

And I think it is funny that a member of a political party that routinely wants to cut WIC funding claims protecting children is anything he actually cares about.  You care about YOUR kids and your FRIEND'S kids, but you could give a **** if some poor black or hispanic kid is malnourished.

LIfe is brutal to those unable to fend for their own. Why? life is eternally separated results never same outcome from day in until exiting day out. all the days between are equally timed part with everything outside your time being alive now.

navigate time left smarter than people demanding rights to believe life isn't self evident daily. Bt you never did this a day since birth.

maineman » 08 Sep 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 11:10 am

No... it is not the same thing.  

And I think it is funny that a member of a political party that routinely wants to cut WIC funding claims protecting children is anything he actually cares about.  You care about YOUR kids and your FRIEND'S kids, but you could give a **** if some poor black or hispanic kid is malnourished.

I am not a member of the Republican party. I woke up. I learned that both parties work together to pull the wool over the public, just in different capacities. You are still asleep. Happy dreams. 

Vegas » 08 Sep 2024, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 11:14 am

I am not a member of the Republican party. I woke up. I learned that both parties work together to pull the wool over the public, just in different capacities. You are still asleep. Happy dreams. 

hey Vegas, there are 21 global religions governing 8.12 billion souls that believe life isn't self evident daily. In those 8.12 billion soles displaced in 5 generation gaps of 5 ancestral lineages, there are 1,043 political parties globally in practice daily as well in this species.


So you want to isolate 2 parties of one country blaming them for what the other 1,062 methods of ignoring now is eternity are going on as well.

Gee hypocrisy is doing the same thing shaming everyone else being different from your method of ignoring one universal constant daily.

maineman » 08 Sep 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 11:10 am

No... it is not the same thing.  

And I think it is funny that a member of a political party that routinely wants to cut WIC funding claims protecting children is anything he actually cares about.  You care about YOUR kids and your FRIEND'S kids, but you could give a **** if some poor black or hispanic kid is malnourished.

What's funny is the fact you didn't learn a damn thing after the unmitigated disaster that was the Joe Biden administration......you're trumpeting an even worse moron for your vote.
 

31stArrival » 08 Sep 2024, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 11:19 am

hey Vegas, there are 21 global religions governing 8.12 billion souls that believe life isn't self evident daily. In those 8.12 billion soles displaced in 5 generation gaps of 5 ancestral lineages, there are 1,043 political parties globally in practice daily as well in this species.

So you want to isolate 2 parties of one country blaming them for what the other 1,062 methods of ignoring now is eternity are going on as well.

Gee hypocrisy is doing the same thing shaming everyone else being different from your method of ignoring one universal constant daily.

Yeah, well...it was pretty clear that I was talking about just the two, so....

Vegas » 08 Sep 2024, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 11:21 am

Yeah, well...it was pretty clear that I was talking about just the two, so....

You follow social consensus very well, but like all social consensuses, none are apt to correct the corruption practiced last 7,000 years combined.

Global effects of power of suggesting life isn't self evident daily affects every reality equally here.

RebelGator » 08 Sep 2024, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 11:20 am

What's funny is the fact you didn't learn a damn thing after the unmitigated disaster that was the Joe Biden administration......you're trumpeting an even worse moron for your vote.

Cool opinion.  millions do not share it.

Vegas » 08 Sep 2024, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 11:14 am

I am not a member of the Republican party. I woke up. I learned that both parties work together to pull the wool over the public, just in different capacities. You are still asleep. Happy dreams.

one of them is going to control the government that runs the place where you live.  Bitching from the sidelines is fruitless

maineman » 08 Sep 2024, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 11:25 am

Cool opinion.  millions do not share it.

Over 8.12 billion ancestors of this species in 2023 statistics won't share mine either. That includes my own ancestry. I navigate alone but I am never lonely knowing how and why I exist self evidently here.

I don't lead people into temptation to believe life isn't self evident and I leave every ancestor with their free will to change their mind cultivated since birth.

maineman » 08 Sep 2024, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 7:02 am

again... there is no "defense" there.  There is merely a prioritization of importance.  

I don't like murderers.  I don't like shoplifters.  I think putting perpetrators of the former in prison is more important.

I don't like climate change. I don't like the idea of men in dresses using ladies' rooms.  I think the former is a greater threat to society.

See how that works?

"How it works", apparently is quite different that what you clearly support!
You claim you don't like murderers, but then vote for the Biden/Harris administration that welcomes them into the country with open borders:

Laken Riley murder: Five other times illegal immigrants were charged with murder
Washington Examiner By Anna Giaritelli March 2, 2024

You claim you don't like shoplifters, but you support Harris' defunding the police, promoting no bail laws, increasing the limit shoplifters can steal, and personally bailing looters and rioters out of jail:

Kamala Harris-backed bail fund that freed violent criminals back in spotlight
Washington Examiner By Gabe Kaminsky July 22, 2024

 

Kamala Harris praised ‘defund the police’ movement in June 2020 radio interview
By Andrew Kaczynski and Em Steck, CNN  Sat July 27, 2024

 

72 Percent Of Voters Oppose Men In Women’s Sports, Don’t Realize Kamala Harris Supports It
Bobby Burack August 2, 2024 6:18 PM

 

 Supreme Court strikes down Biden-Harris Title IX change that some argued would allow men in women's sports
Fox News by Jackson Thompson
The Supreme Court voted 5-4 Friday to reject a Biden administration emergency request to enforce portions of a new rule that includes protections from discrimination for transgender students under Title IX. 

The request would have permitted biological men in women’s bathrooms, locker rooms and dorms in 10 states where there are state-level and local-level rules in place to prevent it.

Get the point, nitwit?  
You CLAIM to be against ALL those things, but you're so **** by Trump TDS and hatred that you STILL stupidly think Harris is best suited for the job as president!
I ask you, are you mentally sick? Imbecilic?  Or both?
Because there is NO WAY you can possibly justify such incongruity!
 

maineman » 08 Sep 2024, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 11:25 am

Cool opinion.  millions do not share it.

lying ****! You don't know millions of peoples opinion. Lying **** stain.

Zeets2 » 08 Sep 2024, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 11:36 am

"How it works", apparently is quite different that what you clearly support!
You claim you don't like murderers, but then vote for the Biden/Harris administration that welcomes them into the country with open borders:

You claim you don't like shoplifters, but you support Harris' defunding the police, promoting no bail laws, increasing the limit shoplifters can steal, and personally bailing looters and rioters out of jail:


Get the point, nitwit?  
You CLAIM to be against ALL those things, but you're so **** by Trump TDS and hatred that you STILL stupidly think Harris is best suited for the job as president!
I ask you, are you mentally sick? Imbecilic?  Or both?
Because there is NO WAY you can possibly justify such incongruity!

ALL of those issues fall way lower on MY hot issues list than: 

1.  maintaining strong global alliances
2.  addressing climate change/protecting the environment/weaning ourselves off fossil fuel
3.  universal health care
4. tax breaks for the lower and middle class and tax increases on 1%ers
5.  women's reproductive freedom
6.  forgiving student loans
7.  strengthening labor unions

And on ALL of those, Harris/Walz share my values.  There is NOTHING incongruous about supporting the Democratic ticket, given my positions on those - MY - key issues.