Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 2:02 pm

No...it is the reason Insurance companies paid 75 million for Sandy Hook.

To argue that the look is unrelated to the marketing would require a gormlessness of which only a Grifty rube could possibly be possessed.

You demand to be quoted, verbatim, and in considerable context.....you, on the other hand, freely paraphrase and restate.

 

*Huey » 10 Sep 2024, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 2:05 pm

Nah, I have been saying that is why you fear them for 7 years now.  I suppose someone will post these ads that are so troubling.

Nah, I have been saying that is why you fear them for 7 years now. 

Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 2:20 pm

And for 7 years you've been wrong about that...along with much of everything else.

*Huey » 10 Sep 2024, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 2:27 pm

Not at all.

Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 2:32 pm

Completely.

My argument has been, and remains, that it is idiotic to promiscuously distribute a weapon designed and developed for combat to civilians.

That is about FUNCTION.

Repeat.

It is MARKETED on the basis of its  look, and that is

a) a violation of the law under which they were made legal

b) the reason insurance companies paid 75 million for Samdy Hook.

*Huey » 10 Sep 2024, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 2:37 pm

I stopped here:

promiscuously distribute a weapon designed and developed for combat to civilians.

read my sig.

*Huey » 10 Sep 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 9:34 am

To prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, several features were changed. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass, the buffer spring is heavier. On the select-fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when the automatic fire is selected.[74]Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option (this requires a registered part with the ATF). Lower receivers that are select-fire are identified by a pinhole above the safety/mode selection switch.[75][76][77][78] As designed by Colt, the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select-fire components. The pivot pin may also be slightly larger in diameter.[79][80]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AR-15%E ... tyle_rifle

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 08 Sep 2024, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2024, 4:11 pm

you will urinate in your BatGirl underoos when we take them
I know for a fact you wear BatGirl underoos

@Beekeeper  knows I am serious

DO THE RIGHT THING TURN YOUR WEAPONS IN NOW

https://i.postimg.cc/6QpqKYX1/BATGIRL.jpg
 
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 2:32 pm

Completely.

My argument has been, and remains, that it is idiotic to promiscuously distribute a weapon designed and developed for combat to civilians.

That is about FUNCTION.

Repeat.

It is MARKETED on the basis of its  look, and that is

a) a violation of the law under which they were made legal

b) the reason insurance companies paid 75 million for Samdy Hook.
 

murdock » 10 Sep 2024, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 2:55 pm

The only thing you're gonna take is another *** dick up your ***, just like mommy taught you. Now, come get them you dickless ****! Be first through the door!

*Huey » 10 Sep 2024, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 2:51 pm

@Blackvegetable  

Stop lying

Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 2:58 pm

Modifications.

Making them Variants.

Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 2:32 pm

Completely.

My argument has been, and remains, that it is idiotic to promiscuously distribute a weapon designed and developed for combat to civilians.

That is about FUNCTION.

Repeat.

It is MARKETED on the basis of its  look, and that is

a) a violation of the law under which they were made legal

b) the reason insurance companies paid 75 million for Samdy Hook.
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 2:58 pm

Modifications.

Making them Variants.

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 10 Sep 2024, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 2:57 pm

send your address via a message or pipe down.
 

*Huey » 10 Sep 2024, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 2:58 pm

Read the citation.   Understand what was changed.

Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 3:02 pm

It doesn't make it a different design.

To modify a GTI to Stage 1 requires a chip, and a new air intake.

To go Stage 2, you need a new chip, a downpipe and a euro clutch.

None of those modifications require a different design.
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 3:02 pm

It doesn't make it a different design.

To modify a GTI to Stage 1 requires a chip, and a new air intake.

To go Stage 2, you need a new chip, a downpipe and a euro clutch.

None of those modifications require a different design.

Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Sep 2024, 1:46 pm

You can't actually formulate an argument....

What is marketed is the "warrior cosplay" delusion. It wouldn't work if they were selling a Ruger Mini-14 Ranch....it has to look TACTICAL