Authorities search for shooter along I-75 in southeastern Kentucky with up to 7 people hurt 

1 … 4 5 6 7 8
User avatar
Vegas
10 Sep 2024 9:50 am
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,950 posts
*Huey » 10 Sep 2024, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ I figured it was Vega Giants/Bidencrimefamily.

I don't think so. He slipped. He started talking about his username at .org, IceburgSlim, did strikethroughs, and he only replied with things that Veghead and I would know about. 

Not to mention he incessantly evades, bombards people with questions/demands, and tags daily. 
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
User avatar
Blackvegetable
10 Sep 2024 9:51 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
58,603 posts
Beekeeper » 10 Sep 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ The settlement was based on the suit claiming the MARKETING was what was "faulty", NOT THE WEAPONS THEMSELVES!!

Sucks you get DICKSTOMPED AGAIN, huh, ****??
The **** you say...

What was it about the marketing, Fondler?
User avatar
Beekeeper
10 Sep 2024 9:55 am
User avatar
      
10,488 posts
Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑ The **** you say...

What was it about the marketing, Fondler?

THE **** YOU SAY, DICKSUCKER!!

And I QUOTE....

"The settlement marks the first time a gunmaker has been held responsible for a mass shooting in the country. The plaintiffs’ lawyers took the unusual route of focusing not on Remington’s manufacturing of the gun used but on its marketing. While the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act grants firearms makers immunity from product liability, the plaintiffs argued that law did not apply. Instead, they focused on Remington’s “aggressive and violence-glorifying marketing” of its AR-15s as an unfair trade practice and a violation of Connecticut law. The legal strategy sought to uncover how Remington marketed the AR-15 to “young, violence-prone men.”

Now, you want to GO **** YOURSELF again, as I MASSIVELY CURB STOMPED YOUR ***!!! AGAIN!!

4 Insurers, 5 Policies to Pay $73M Sandy Hook Settlement Against Gunmaker Remington (insurancejournal.com)
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
User avatar
Beekeeper
10 Sep 2024 10:29 am
User avatar
      
10,488 posts
Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑
Beekeeper » 10 Sep 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ The settlement was based on the suit claiming the MARKETING was what was "faulty", NOT THE WEAPONS THEMSELVES!!

Sucks you get DICKSTOMPED AGAIN, huh, ****??
The **** you say...

What was it about the marketing, Fondler?
 
Beekeeper » 10 Sep 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑
Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑ The **** you say...

What was it about the marketing, Fondler?
THE **** YOU SAY, DICKSUCKER!!

And I QUOTE....

"The settlement marks the first time a gunmaker has been held responsible for a mass shooting in the country. The plaintiffs’ lawyers took the unusual route of focusing not on Remington’s manufacturing of the gun used but on its marketing. While the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act grants firearms makers immunity from product liability, the plaintiffs argued that law did not apply. Instead, they focused on Remington’s “aggressive and violence-glorifying marketing” of its AR-15s as an unfair trade practice and a violation of Connecticut law. The legal strategy sought to uncover how Remington marketed the AR-15 to “young, violence-prone men.”

Now, you want to GO **** YOURSELF again, as I MASSIVELY CURB STOMPED YOUR ***!!! AGAIN!!

4 Insurers, 5 Policies to Pay $73M Sandy Hook Settlement Against Gunmaker Remington (insurancejournal.com)
Where did you run off to DICKSUCKER???  @Blackvegetable  

I guess that CURB STOMPING IN A BOX OF PIG TURDS required STITCHES this time, huh??

Image   Image   Image   Image   Image  
 
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
User avatar
Blackvegetable
10 Sep 2024 10:31 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
58,603 posts
Beekeeper » 10 Sep 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ THE **** YOU SAY, DICKSUCKER!!

And I QUOTE....

"The settlement marks the first time a gunmaker has been held responsible for a mass shooting in the country. The plaintiffs’ lawyers took the unusual route of focusing not on Remington’s manufacturing of the gun used but on its marketing. While the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act grants firearms makers immunity from product liability, the plaintiffs argued that law did not apply. Instead, they focused on Remington’s “aggressive and violence-glorifying marketing” of its AR-15s as an unfair trade practice and a violation of Connecticut law. The legal strategy sought to uncover how Remington marketed the AR-15 to “young, violence-prone men.”

Now, you want to GO **** YOURSELF again, as I MASSIVELY CURB STOMPED YOUR ***!!! AGAIN!!

4 Insurers, 5 Policies to Pay $73M Sandy Hook Settlement Against Gunmaker Remington (insurancejournal.com)
And how do you believe this supports any case of yours, Fondler?
User avatar
Blackvegetable
10 Sep 2024 10:34 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
58,603 posts
Beekeeper » 10 Sep 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ THE **** YOU SAY, DICKSUCKER!!

And I QUOTE....

"The settlement marks the first time a gunmaker has been held responsible for a mass shooting in the country. The plaintiffs’ lawyers took the unusual route of focusing not on Remington’s manufacturing of the gun used but on its marketing. While the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act grants firearms makers immunity from product liability, the plaintiffs argued that law did not apply. Instead, they focused on Remington’s “aggressive and violence-glorifying marketing” of its AR-15s as an unfair trade practice and a violation of Connecticut law. The legal strategy sought to uncover how Remington marketed the AR-15 to “young, violence-prone men.”

Now, you want to GO **** YOURSELF again, as I MASSIVELY CURB STOMPED YOUR ***!!! AGAIN!!

4 Insurers, 5 Policies to Pay $73M Sandy Hook Settlement Against Gunmaker Remington (insurancejournal.com)
Image*Huey+529 minutes ago

DMA
User avatar
Vegas
10 Sep 2024 10:44 am
User avatar
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
Beevee's Owner/Giant Slayer
20,950 posts

Wi
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...



Image
User avatar
Beekeeper
10 Sep 2024 11:45 am
User avatar
      
10,488 posts
Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ And how do you believe this supports any case of yours, Fondler?

It DOES NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES support your claim, DICKBREATH!!

Bet that must really blister your ***, huh??

:rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
User avatar
Blackvegetable
10 Sep 2024 11:46 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
58,603 posts
Beekeeper » 10 Sep 2024, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ It DOES NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES support your claim, DICKBREATH!!

Bet that must really blister your ***, huh??

Image   Image   Image   Image   Image
What is my claim, Fondler?
User avatar
FJB
10 Sep 2024 11:47 am
FJB
User avatar
      
8,765 posts
Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ What is my claim, Fondler?

You are the one with the pedo tag asshole
User avatar
EDC4ALL!
10 Sep 2024 11:49 am
User avatar
   
1,098 posts
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 09 Sep 2024, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑ When there are NO MORE GUNS, this will not happen  Image

so, are you proposing Gestapo tactics on US citizens, and start door to door searches? Will you start in the inner cities where there is the MOST gun violence? Do you think you can get police to repeatedly violate US citizens 2nd amendment rights?
That's some funny **** right there..........
User avatar
EDC4ALL!
10 Sep 2024 11:51 am
User avatar
   
1,098 posts

You are correct. I don't have candy *** snowflakes as friends. My bad, so.....**** OFF ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Beekeeper
10 Sep 2024 11:51 am
User avatar
      
10,488 posts
Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑
*Huey » 10 Sep 2024, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ The Ruger Mini 14 has the same internals as the Ruger mini tactical, ****.

You should have noticed by now any previous ban or proposed ban, state or federal, has to do with EXTERNAL features, not internal.
My bad....I thought you were referring to the tactical version that actually sells....
You should have noticed by now any previous ban or proposed ban, state or federal, has to do with EXTERNAL features, not internal.
I've tried to explain it to you, but you'll need to read about the reasons Insurance companies paid 75 million for Sandy Hook yourself.

 
 
Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑
Beekeeper » 10 Sep 2024, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ It DOES NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES support your claim, DICKBREATH!!

Bet that must really blister your ***, huh??

Image   Image   Image   Image   Image
What is my claim, Fondler?

 
How's ANOTHER CURB STOMPING WITH YOUR TONGUE IN A PILE OF PIG TURDS FEEL, DICKSUCKER???

YOU claimed the settlement was for "external features". It wasn't as I VASTLY PROVED and you refuse to pay any attention to!!!

Now, go get your mommy to clean up your WRECKED *** and GO **** YOURSELF. Again!!


 
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
User avatar
Blackvegetable
10 Sep 2024 11:57 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
58,603 posts
Beekeeper » 10 Sep 2024, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑
How's ANOTHER CURB STOMPING WITH YOUR TONGUE IN A PILE OF PIG TURDS FEEL, DICKSUCKER???

YOU claimed the settlement was for "external features". It wasn't as I VASTLY PROVED and you refuse to pay any attention to!!!

Now, go get your mommy to clean up your WRECKED *** and GO **** YOURSELF. Again!!
What do you think the marketing is about?


 
User avatar
Beekeeper
10 Sep 2024 12:52 pm
User avatar
      
10,488 posts
Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ What do you think the marketing is about?

The LAWSUIT was NOTHING about the "external features" of the AR-15. It was TOTALLY about how and WHO Remington marketed the gun. 

SUCKS you have NO **** CLUE what the hell you are talking about. Again.

**** OFF, DICKSUCKER. YOU GOT YOUR *** KICKED AGAIN AND KNOW IT. STOP trying to defend something that is INDEFENSIBLE AND WITHOUT MERIT!! I PROVED the reasoning behind the lawsuit. YOUR GOT YOUR *** CURB STOMPED!!

Now, GO THE **** AWAY. AGAIN!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
User avatar
Deezer Shoove
10 Sep 2024 1:18 pm
User avatar
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
10,378 posts

What I said is absolutely true. Why is that a problem?
Do you have any real experience with the bang bangs?
Please seat yourself.

Image

I like the very things you hate.
User avatar
Blackvegetable
10 Sep 2024 1:39 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
58,603 posts
DeezerShoove » 10 Sep 2024, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ What I said is absolutely true. Why is that a problem?
Do you have any real experience with the bang bangs?
I don't keep a **** manual and there's nothing wrong with relying on a reference.

Further, I wonder if you even know why weight was raised.
User avatar
Blackvegetable
10 Sep 2024 1:46 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
58,603 posts
Beekeeper » 10 Sep 2024, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ The LAWSUIT was NOTHING about the "external features" of the AR-15. It was TOTALLY about how and WHO Remington marketed the gun. 

SUCKS you have NO **** CLUE what the hell you are talking about. Again.

**** OFF, DICKSUCKER. YOU GOT YOUR *** KICKED AGAIN AND KNOW IT. STOP trying to defend something that is INDEFENSIBLE AND WITHOUT MERIT!! I PROVED the reasoning behind the lawsuit. YOUR GOT YOUR *** CURB STOMPED!!

Now, GO THE **** AWAY. AGAIN!!
You can't actually formulate an argument....

What is marketed is the "warrior cosplay" delusion. It wouldn't work if they were selling a Ruger Mini-14 Ranch....it has to look TACTICAL
User avatar
Huey
10 Sep 2024 1:50 pm
User avatar
      
36,863 posts
Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ You can't actually formulate an argument....

What is marketed is the "warrior cosplay" delusion. It wouldn't work if they were selling a Ruger Mini-14 Ranch....it has to look TACTICAL

 
Looks like this is you admitting the reason they should be banned is based on APPEARANCE as opposed to FUNCTION.  


 
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Blackvegetable
10 Sep 2024 2:02 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
58,603 posts
*Huey » 10 Sep 2024, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Looks like this is you admitting the reason they should be banned is based on APPEARANCE as opposed to FUNCTION.
No...it is the reason Insurance companies paid 75 million for Sandy Hook.

To argue that the look is unrelated to the marketing would require a gormlessness of which only a Grifty rube could possibly be possessed.

You demand to be quoted, verbatim, and in considerable context.....you, on the other hand, freely paraphrase and restate.
1 … 4 5 6 7 8

Who is online

In total there are 3454 users online :: 7 registered, 13 bots, and 3434 guests
Bots: CensysInspect, Not, SpiderLing, CriteoBot, proximic, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Applebot, bingbot, YandexBot, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search