maineman » 16 Sep 2024, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ I don't like warm beer, and I don't like the New York Yankees.
They are not "lumped together in my brain." They are merely two disparate things that I don't like.
You really aren't anywhere near as clever as you fashion yourself.
maineman » 16 Sep 2024, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ I don't like warm beer, and I don't like the New York Yankees.
They are not "lumped together in my brain." They are merely two disparate things that I don't like.
You really aren't anywhere near as clever as you fashion yourself.
As you fashion yourself in the art of vernacular tribalism.maineman » 16 Sep 2024, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ I don't like warm beer, and I don't like the New York Yankees.
They are not "lumped together in my brain." They are merely two disparate things that I don't like.
You really aren't anywhere near as clever as you fashion yourself. :wave:
DeezerShoove » 16 Sep 2024, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ Fashion?
I prefer "fancy".
btw
You aren't remotely close to as smart as you think you are.
Either you're running from questions or you just get plain stopped short in your tracks.
So I guess we're both delusional.
Hey stupid!maineman » 15 Sep 2024, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course, they were willing to hear it. They just didn't need to actually try the cases because Team Kraken's initial filings didn't pass the laugh test.
Do you remember Rudy outside of Four Seasons Garden Supply with his five binders of "evidence" of voter fraud? Didn't you ever wonder why he never bothered to get that evidence admitted in a court of law? Because it wasn't evidence - it was unfounded assertions and unsupported claims and lawyers are taught never to perjure themselves by claiming something that is someone else's opinion is somehow fact.
Kamala broke no laws. The Vice President is not tasked with enforcing immigration policy. Mayorkas is.
I would not be willing to take 100 million asylum seekers... certainly not before their petitions were heard and adjudicated
Every court? Even the ones with Trump-appointed judges?Zeets2 » 16 Sep 2024, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑ Hey stupid!
How would the judge know what was in 5 BINDERS OF EVIDENCE if he refused to hear the case? In every court, the fix was in and the judges refused to hear it.
So, in your opinion the buck doesn't stop with the person the president puts in charge of "stemming the flow of illegals", but with a traitorous flunky puppet that was put in charge in order to take the slings and arrows for Kamala.
I see, so you claim to SUPPORT the border patrol and the courts vetting the illegals, but you're ready to commit to another 4 years of the same idiots that have allowed tens of millions of illegals to come in UNVETTED by voting for Kamala, don't you?
That kind of inconsistency makes you a typical lying liberal! And an ignorant one at that!
****, LIAR!maineman » 16 Sep 2024, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ Every court? Even the ones with Trump-appointed judges?![]()
No judge "refused to hear the cases"; they just summarily dismissed them after opening arguments because Team Kraken, who had the burden of proof, failed to proffer sufficient evidence to carry that burden. BECAUSE OPINIONS AIN'T PROOF. ANOMALIES AIN'T PROOF. PROOF IS PROOF. ANd Rudy's binders didn't have any of THAT.
Harris had nothing to do with the border. Her task was narrowly defined as working with Central American governments to find solutions to the root causes of the northern diaspora.
Trump stopped comprehensive bipartisan border reform legislation that was endorsed by the Border Patrol. He put his own political aspirations above the country. Harris will sign it on day one.
And the **** "border reform legislation" wasn't worth the paper it was printed on, and would NEVER have reached the president's desk for a signature when it couldn't even be passed in the Senate, let alone in the Republican controlled House! Trump HAD NO VOTE on that bill, did he asshole? All he had to do was point out the fact that such a phony bill would have done NOTHING to stop hundreds of thousands of illegals from STILL pouring in through the open border, and the additional border guards it called for would have NOT been used to stop more illegals from coming in, but instead would have been used TO PROCESS THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS THEY WANTED TO CONTINUE TO ALLOW IN!Biden tasks Harris with tackling migrant influx on US-Mexico borderBBC 24 March 2021
US President Joe Biden has put Vice-President Kamala Harris in charge of controlling migration at the southern border following a big influx of new arrivals.
Mr Biden said he was giving her a "tough job" but that she was "the most qualified person to do it".
Since January, the Biden administration has reversed a policy of turning away unaccompanied children, instead choosing to process them and place them with sponsoring families in the US.
But Mr Biden's critics say his policies have led to a surge in illegal migration.
In February, US Customs officials took more than 100,000 people into custody along the southern border, a 28% increase on the previous month.
Announcing Ms Harris's appointment as his immigration czar, Mr Biden told reporters and officials at the White House: "She's the most qualified person to do it, to lead our efforts with Mexico and the Northern Triangle [Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador], and the countries that are going to need help in stemming the movement of so many folks - stemming the migration to our southern border".
"...Mexico and the Northern Triangle [Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador], and the countries that are going to need help in stemming the movement of so many folks - stemming the migration to our southern border".Zeets2 » 16 Sep 2024, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ ****, LIAR!
Here is Biden's direct quote telling us that Harris
And the **** "border reform legislation" wasn't worth the paper it was printed on, and would NEVER have reached the president's desk for a signature when it couldn't even be passed in the Senate, let alone in the Republican controlled House! Trump HAD NO VOTE on that bill, did he asshole? All he had to do was point out the fact that such a phony bill would have done NOTHING to stop hundreds of thousands of illegals from STILL pouring in through the open border, and the additional border guards it called for would have NOT been used to stop more illegals from coming in, but instead would have been used TO PROCESS THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS THEY WANTED TO CONTINUE TO ALLOW IN!
So if you're dumb enough to believe that the same bill could EVER reach the desk of a president Harris, you'd have to be stupid enough to think that Democrats will ALSO win at least 4 additional seats in the Senate AND take majority control of the House on top of electing a whore like Kamala to the presidency!
Democrat morons like yourself want everyone to believe that ANY new legislation was needed when all Biden had to do was to issue the same kind of Executive Order that Trump did TO ACTUALLY CLOSE THE BORDER AND FINISH BUILDING THE WALL! But that's NOT what your ****** president wants, is it? And dopes like you are happy to let them try to get away with that because you don't give two **** about the crime they bring in among the drug dealers, the gang members, the child traffickers, the murderers, rapists and pedophiles that have been dumped out of jails in Central and So. America or the 3rd world diseases including Covid that so many of them carry with them!
Isn't THAT what you truly want, you scumbag traitor?
You're just lucky that today isn't "Slap an Idiot Day"!maineman » 16 Sep 2024, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ "...Mexico and the Northern Triangle [Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador], and the countries that are going to need help in stemming the movement of so many folks - stemming the migration to our southern border".
Just as I said, she was not put in charge of the border. She was put in charge of working with the other countries listed to figure out how to stem the northern diaspora.
I believe that Kamala Harris will have coattails. I believe that the giant upsurge of voter registration in the wake of Harris getting nominated, Harris kicking the clown's *** in the debate, Taylor Swift endorsing Kamala, and the pervasive effects of Dobbs combined with the accelerating bumbling and mumbling of Trump will all translate to democratic victories up and down the ticket.
Women are PISSED. Black women are pissed about Dobbs and PUMPED about being to vote for a fellow black sister for the first time in history. Democrats KNOW how to get the vote out. It's already started where I live. Phone banks are humming. Doors are being knocked on. Flyers are being handed out. Neighbors are having conversations with each other. There are at least 100 Harris signs for every Trump sign.
She's got joy. She's got energy. He's got Haitians eating dogs, Hannibal Lecter, boats, sharks and batteries. She's pounding the campaign trail. He's playing golf.
More than a million people have entered the government voting website from the hyperlink on Taylor Swift's webpage getting voter registration information. Do you really think those young voters are gonna vote for that fat, blathering clown?
All we really need now is for the clown to agree to another debate/***-whupping reluctantly, and the Big MO will work its magic. Once he loses, the criminal trials against him can be jumpstarted, and then, if God is listening, I will get MY Christmas wish that Donald Trump be shivved in prison by a transgendered black inmate.
Zeets2 » 16 Sep 2024, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑ You're just lucky that today isn't "Slap an Idiot Day"!
How dumb do you have to be not to see how pissed off young people are that they can't get a decent paying job, can't afford a 7% mortgage to buy a house, can barely pay for their groceries, gas for their car, and their electric bill, and still be stupid enough to think that they're going to give a **** because a brainless dolt like Taylor Swift likes Kamala? And you have to be even dumber not to realize how blacks are watching how ten million unskilled and illiterate illegals are being handed jobs by your stupid liberal programs, after they've already been given free food, free housing, free healthcare, free education, free smartphones, and free travel THAT THEY ARE FORCED TO PAY FOR?
Are you really ignorant enough to believe that middle-class voters are blind to the thousands of homeless junkies living on the streets in their neighborhoods, the crime and the drug dealing going on all around them, or how the Biden/Harris inflation has destroyed their ability to buy a home, afford to have kids, or pay for their gas, groceries, and skyrocketing interest on their credit cards?
You're in for one helluva shock when your whore and Tampon Tim get their asses handed to them on Election day, with or without another debate, which will ONLY take place on a network that isn't working in tandem with her! And I'll be cheering when you wind up out on a ledge somewhere as you realize that Trump will be your President again for another 4 years!
BIDENS CHILDCARE PLANSmaineman » 09 Sep 2024, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑ If you win in November, can you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable? And if so, what specific piece of legislation will you advance?-- Reshma Saujani
"Well, I would do that. And we’re sitting down – you know, I was somebody – we had – Sen. Marco Rubio and my daughter Ivanka were so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that – because, look, child care is child care. It’s – couldn’t – you know, it’s something – you have to have it. In this country, you have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to, but they’ll get used to it very quickly – and it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care. That – it’s going to take care – we’re going to have – I – I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.Because I have to say with child care – I want to stay with child care – but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just – that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in. We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people, and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people, but we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first, it’s about Make America Great Again. We have to do it because right now we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question." Donald Trump

JOEYS CHILDCARE PLANSmaineman » 09 Sep 2024, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑ If you win in November, can you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable? And if so, what specific piece of legislation will you advance?-- Reshma Saujani
"Well, I would do that. And we’re sitting down – you know, I was somebody – we had – Sen. Marco Rubio and my daughter Ivanka were so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that – because, look, child care is child care. It’s – couldn’t – you know, it’s something – you have to have it. In this country, you have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to, but they’ll get used to it very quickly – and it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care. That – it’s going to take care – we’re going to have – I – I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.Because I have to say with child care – I want to stay with child care – but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just – that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in. We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people, and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people, but we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first, it’s about Make America Great Again. We have to do it because right now we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question." Donald Trump
Despite the fact that NJ is solidly a blue state which Kameltoe will win easily, I still have every intention of voting here for Trump.maineman » 16 Sep 2024, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Thanks for your opinion. I disagree with it. Enjoy the next 54 days. But hey, relax. If you're right, you've got this in the bag. Chill. Hell, you probably don't even need to go through the hassle of voting.
Zeets2 » 18 Sep 2024, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ Despite the fact that NJ is solidly a blue state which Kameltoe will win easily, I still have every intention of voting here for Trump.
And my only fear over the next several months it that some other crazed liberal like you will continue in their attempts to assassinate him.
And if that's successful, I have little doubt you'll be leading the cheers and dancing in the streets for it, based on how happy you would be to see a person like me shot and killed for exercising my 1st Amendment right to free speech, which a dope like you considers to be treason.
Libs like you don't even realize how radically warped you've become or how dangerous clowns like you are to society.
So once again, you would cheer and support mob justice when it's perpetrated by confirmed and committed liberal minorities, but despise it when conservative Americans break a few windows and walk peacefully around the Capitol. If there was ANY real attempt to commit insurrection, you're telling me the rioters would not have been brandishing guns and knives against the police armed with guns and clubs?maineman » 18 Sep 2024, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑ January 6th was an attempted insurrection. It had nothing to do with free speech. It had to do with attempting to disrupt the Constitutionally mandated peaceful transfer of power, and it had to do with attempting to lynch the Vice President of the United States. Those are treasonous activities, IMHO.
And no... I certainly would NOT cheer or dance in the street if Donald Trump were to be assassinated before the election. I have high hopes that he will meet his untimely demise by being shivved by a black, transgendered fellow convict while wearing an orange prison jumper. Inshallah!
When have I ever cheered or supported mob justice by anyone?Zeets2 » 18 Sep 2024, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ So once again, you would cheer and support mob justice when it's perpetrated by confirmed and committed liberal minorities, but despise it when conservative Americans break a few windows and walk peacefully around the Capitol. If there was ANY real attempt to commit insurrection, you're telling me the rioters would not have been brandishing guns and knives against the police armed with guns and clubs?
Why am I not surprised?
You've already stated your wish that I would be shot and killed for stating my opinion, didn't you, asshole?maineman » 18 Sep 2024, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ When have I ever cheered or supported mob justice by anyone?
The lynch mob was chanting, "Hang Mike Pence" You don't need guns. All you need is a rope.
And was Ashlii Babbit walking peacefully around the Capitol???
I stated my opinion that you were a traitor and, after a jury found you guilty of that crime, you should be executed.Zeets2 » 18 Sep 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑ You've already stated your wish that I would be shot and killed for stating my opinion, didn't you, asshole?
You would need more that just a rope to carry out a hanging of any politician as well-guarded as the VP of the US, or didn't you know that, moron?
And Babbit never got the chance to walk around the Capitol peacefully as hundreds of others did. Had she entered through one of the doors held open by the Capitol police for the demonstrators to enter through, she'd be alive today. But a warning shot fired above the crowd would have accomplished the same thing to stop the rioters and would have been a far better choice than murdering a military veteran and mother.
Do you not agree, or do you have that great a need to see a woman like her shot and killed, you bloodthirsty scumbag?