He's a spender for sure.
Without state-raised babies, who's gonna people our prison industrial complex?
the question wasn't a for or against question. The question was what legislation he would sign.Cannonpointer » 09 Sep 2024, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, I can easily explain it, if that's all you want.
He says he's for it.
maineman » 09 Sep 2024, 8:26 pm » wrote: ↑ what specific piece of legislation will you advance?
he would do WHAT, exactly?
The answer was.
He gave a definite maybe.
BuckNaked » 09 Sep 2024, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑ You meaning me? Im not a politician
he would help lower child care costs
He would sweep around the side step, do a little dance and lead the people on.maineman » 09 Sep 2024, 8:26 pm » wrote: ↑ what specific piece of legislation will you advance?
he would do WHAT, exactly?
Cannonpointer » 09 Sep 2024, 8:30 pm » wrote: ↑ The answer was.
He gave a definite maybe.
Look, clown. Politicians almost never answer direct questions, and when they do, they almost always lie.
Trump sucks. Just not as much as your hor, because he's just a narcissist - not a retarded narcissist.
A definite maybe.maineman » 09 Sep 2024, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑ he was asked a specific question...which is the first sentence of the OP.
His answer is the remainder of the OP.
Can you explain to me how he answered the question?
Yes or No?
Someone who votes for the party erasing womanhood oughtn't prattle about misogyny, fruitcake.
maineman » 09 Sep 2024, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑ nice dodge.
**** nutless coward.
crawl back under the rock.
Damn. The PIC is rarely discussed.Cannonpointer » 09 Sep 2024, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Without state-raised babies, who's gonna people our prison industrial complex?
What you call socialism, I call planning for the future.
DeezerShoove » 09 Sep 2024, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't constantly pro or con candidates. I'm not here to start threads all the time.
That all happens by others. You are a part of that.
I merely commented that you do a lot of Trump trash talk because you can't seem to promote the good in your candidate.
Call that nutless if you like but you still remain silent on the greatness that is KaKa.
She is great, right? As of a couple of months ago anyway.![]()
maineman » 09 Sep 2024, 8:44 pm » wrote: ↑ She is a seasoned prosecutor, attorney general, senator, and vice president. She speaks in complete, coherent sentences, and she stands on the democratic party platform that I support.
Donald Trump is a misogynistic, elderly, rambling, incurious, racist, malignant narcissist.
To me that choice is pretty obvious.
For folks who are simultaneously sucking on a scrotum, probably not so much.
oh... **** you. Try for just a moment to explain Trump's quote from the OP as something someone that YOU honestly think deserves to have the nuclear codes would say.DeezerShoove » 09 Sep 2024, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑ "She speaks in complete, coherent sentences, and she stands on the democratic party platform that I support"
Okie dokie, partisan.
At least you tried.![]()
![]()
![]()
maineman » 09 Sep 2024, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑ oh... **** you. Try for just a moment to explain Trump's quote from the OP as something someone that YOU honestly think deserves to have the nuclear codes would say.
Go on. I **** DARE YOU.
maineman » 09 Sep 2024, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Seriously... not one MAGA scrotum sucker dares to step up and explain their demigod's answer to the simple question about childcare legislation?
nobody?
crickets?
that's it?
DeezerShoove » 09 Sep 2024, 11:03 pm » wrote: ↑ I have never said I could defend his ****. YOU said KaKa was coherent.
This means I need to defend nothing. You, however, are putting yourself on the spot.
And I will happily point out you can't defend her word salads without dragging the carnival barker into it.
Weak sauce, Intellectual Debater.
btw
I only want Trump because people I detest are fighting so hard to keep him out (like you).
Never have changed my stance. I don't have a **** thing to defend (like you).
Hope this helps.
btw2
Keep battling for that intelligent debate status. You claimed that one too.![]()