Zeets2 » 20 Sep 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ You DIDN'T simply state that you wanted to see me executed by a firing squad, you said you wanted to see me "riddled with bullets until you are a pile of steaming hamburger".
And that, you ignorant buffoon, is in direct opposition to the 8th Amendment which FORBIDS cruel and unusual punishment.
Anyone who approves of your disgusting rant doesn't deserve to live here under our Constitution, much like you.
It's beyond reprehensible for someone to make the statement below and I'm ashamed that we have such savage reprobates living here among decent people.
Your kind of scum belongs festering in a fetid swamp somewhere where you'd feel right at home!
''''Hamburger.....'''maineman » 20 Sep 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ A firing squad where every member of the squad aims at your nose might be cruel... it might even be unusual, but it's certainly not unconstitutional. And I'd be quite happy with just one volley. The "hamburger" part was simply artistic hyperbole.
So tell me, ****.maineman » 20 Sep 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ A firing squad where every member of the squad aims at your nose might be cruel... it might even be unusual, but it's certainly not unconstitutional. And I'd be quite happy with just one volley. The "hamburger" part was simply artistic hyperbole.
Key word: innocent. In my scenario, you would have been found guilty first along with all the other J6ers.Zeets2 » 20 Sep 2024, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ So tell me, ****.
How is it that a scumbag like you differs from the way the Hamas terrorists chose to murder those innocent Israeli civilians?
Are there others like me that you detest enough to want to see them raped and tortured to death? Have YOU ever had the desire to set fire to an infant and burn him to death while forcing the parents to watch before turning THEM into hamburger as well?
Or are we to believe that your animus towards me is the ONLY hatred of a person you want to see murdered for voicing an opinion that you can't handle or refute?
Well, I was nowhere near DC on Jan. 6th, but please tell me.maineman » 20 Sep 2024, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Key word: innocent. In my scenario, you would have been found guilty first along with all the other J6ers.
Zeets2 » 20 Sep 2024, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, I was nowhere near DC on Jan. 6th, but please tell me.
How many of those demonstrators would you wish to see shot in the face until they also resembled hamburger as you'd like to see done with me?
I know I'd consider seeing a psychiatrist if I dreamed of the kind of tortuous scenarios that YOU seem to enjoy so much!
Oh, so now the demonstrators were a "lynch mob"?maineman » 20 Sep 2024, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ All of them. As I told you, on January 6th, I watched in horror as the lynch mob broke through police barriers and smashed their way into the capitol. I wanted machine gun emplacements to mow the vanguard down as they breached, which, I believe, would have caused the cowards behind them to run for their lives.
Zeets2 » 20 Sep 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, so now the demonstrators were a "lynch mob"?
Tell me moron.
Which one of those who were convicted brought the rope?![]()
Yeah, and a dope like you thinks that ANY demonstrator could have reached the VP that day, huh?maineman » 20 Sep 2024, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course, they were a lynch mob. Here was the big clue: A mob of people chanting "HANG MIKE PENCE" is, BY **** DEFINITION, a LYNCH MOB.
And you don't need a rope. Robin Williams and Anthony Bourdain did it with a necktie and a belt.
Zeets2 » 20 Sep 2024, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, and a dope like you thinks that ANY demonstrator could have reached the VP that day, huh?
You're a **** moron!
Sounds to me a lot like you're admitting that Pelosi and Bowser were responsible for the additional security guards they refused to accept when President Trump offered them, huh?
I mean who else could have been at fault for having such inadequate security, dickhead?
So are you ready to admit that Babbitt was murdered because Pelosi and Bowser refused to accept the 10,000 additional security guards that President Trump offered them?maineman » 20 Sep 2024, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑ They came very close. Had Ashlii Babbitt not gotten shot as she climbed through that barrier, the gang behind her would have overpowered the LEO and may very well have reached Pence. You'd have liked that, eh?
She was shot by a law enforcement officer charged with protecting the members of Congress and the Vice President, who warned her not to climb over the barricade. The dumb bitch got EXACTLY what she deserved. He should have shot more of them, IMHO.Zeets2 » 21 Sep 2024, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ So are you ready to admit that Babbitt was murdered because Pelosi and Bowser refused to accept the 10,000 additional security guards that President Trump offered them?
So then why are you SO afraid to answer the question?maineman » 21 Sep 2024, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ She was shot by a law enforcement officer charged with protecting the members of Congress and the Vice President, who warned her not to climb over the barricade. The dumb bitch got EXACTLY what she deserved. He should have shot more of them, IMHO.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/fac ... 929215002/
Zeets2 » 21 Sep 2024, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ So then why are you SO afraid to answer the question?
Do you believe Babbit would be alive today if only Pelosi and/or Bowser had accepted President Trump's offer to provide them with an additional 10,000 security guards for the demonstration which they had a permit for?
And armed guards wouldn't have had to do a thing if there were sufficient numbers to stop any rioters long before they reached the windows of the Capitol.maineman » 21 Sep 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ fake news. you obviously didn't read my link.
People had a permit to demonstrate at the ellipse.... not to break into the capitol to hang the VP.
I think she would be alive today if she had listened to the armed LEO telling her not to climb through the window she had just smashed Easy peasy.
Take a pill.....you're acting like a hysterical girl again.maineman » 20 Sep 2024, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ All of them. As I told you, on January 6th, I watched in horror as the lynch mob broke through police barriers and smashed their way into the capitol. I wanted machine gun emplacements to mow the vanguard down as they breached, which, I believe, would have caused the cowards behind them to run for their lives.
RebelGator » 21 Sep 2024, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Take a pill.....you're acting like a hysterical girl again.
Zeets2 » 21 Sep 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ And armed guards wouldn't have had to do a thing if there were sufficient numbers to stop any rioters long before they reached the windows of the Capitol.
Isn't that the job of "GUARDS"?
When you have the proper number, THEIR PRESENCE ALONE STOPS ILLEGAL ACTIONS!
So why do you refuse to put the blame precisely where it belongs for Babbitts death, on asshole Democrats who WANTED a riot to ensue, as Pelosi and Bowser did?
What's so difficult about it for you?maineman » 09 Sep 2024, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Seriously... not one MAGA scrotum sucker dares to step up and explain their demigod's answer to the simple question about childcare legislation?
nobody?
crickets?
that's it?