I really would prefer to never again have to discuss the infinitely minute possibility that any woman in my life would ever face such a situation and, instead, talk about issues that actually matter, but I fear you won't allow that to happen so I'll try to just commit to ignoring your pathetic entreaties to do so.Cannonpointer » 24 Sep 2024, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Then they LOST THAT RIGHT, you stupid old woman.
That would be precisely the right they lost, in your dishonest hypothetical - the right to shower without one-legged pterodactyls.
But that is not what they lost in reality - AS YOU WELL KNOW and have just implicitly admitted.
What they lost was the right to dick free showers and sporting events (and prison cells and batter-shelters, etc).
So you are completely changing your position, then - without exhibiting the dignity to say so.
Your NEW position is that they do not CARE about the rights they have lost. You are no longer lying that they lost no rights.
Does that sum it up? Or do you wish to engage in further dishonesty?
Accept your ***-whipping and take it like a man.....oh, wait...never mind.maineman » 24 Sep 2024, 7:45 pm » wrote: ↑ neither my wife nor my daughter nor my daughters-in-law have ever had their rights lost.
I'll be sure to let you know when they ever do.
I don't agree.Cannonpointer » 24 Sep 2024, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑ That you believe opinions are given more or less validity by the size of a bank account is rather shabby of you.
Anything George Soros has to say, you need to start taking at face value, if not echoing.
Your standard - not mine.
That wasn't the issue at all.maineman » 25 Sep 2024, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ I really would prefer to never again have to discuss the infinitely minute possibility that any woman in my life would ever face such a situation
I am pro-Trump. I want him to win. And I think he is a terrible businessman. And if you were the businessman you CLAIM to have been, you should also consider him a **** business man.Zeets2 » 25 Sep 2024, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑ I don't agree.
If your opinion of a person's success or failure is based on how much you hate him, as in the case of MM, it's an absurd assumption that the opinion is valid. Only an idiot as ignorant as MM could possibly claim that Trump is not a brilliant and effective businessman.
First of all, isn't it a tad disingenuous to claim you are pro-Trump now, after arguing against voting for him just a few weeks ago? Didn't you state with all clarity that you intended to waste your vote on a 3rd party candidate because you had some idiotic reason for despising Trump?Cannonpointer » 25 Sep 2024, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ I am pro-Trump. I want him to win. And I think he is a terrible businessman. And if you were the businessman you CLAIM to have been, you should also consider him a **** business man.
But then, perhaps you were the same type of fellow as Trump, just not as successful because you were not loaned hundreds of millions by your dad?
Trump lies, cheats and steals. He stiffs small business people. He hires contractors who are delighted to work with the great Donald J. Milhouse Trump, and he pays them pennies on the promised dollar. That's a **** business man - a fellow whose DISHONESTY is key - not his **** "genius." His only genius is self-promotion - and at THAT, he certainly excels.
He is at heart a **** bag man - the kind of guy who slips out the back door with all of the money and as many of the supplies as he can carry, right before the creditors show up. Four bankruptcies - not one of them cost him a penny, but his creditors lost their shirts.
If you consider that good business, that reflects badly on your judgment and your character. A GOOD businessman makes wealth for his investors - not ruin. A GOOD businessman has the friendship of his partners - not the enmity.
I can be constrained from voting for the Orange Clown by my concerns for my soul, and still hope he wins.Zeets2 » 26 Sep 2024, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ First of all, isn't it a tad disingenuous to claim you are pro-Trump now, after arguing against voting for him just a few weeks ago? Didn't you state with all clarity that you intended to waste your vote on a 3rd party candidate because you had some idiotic reason for despising Trump?
It's hardly very complex.Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ I can be constrained from voting for the Orange Clown by my concerns for my soul, and still hope he wins.
I know this because I experienced it in 2016. I was jubilant that he won - but on principle, I could vote for neither snake nor clown.
Nothing disingenuous - it's just more complex than you're mentally prepared to manage.
The rest of your tripe is equally remedial.
Yes, that is precisely how it would appear to a midwit.Zeets2 » 26 Sep 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑ It's hardly very complex.
From where I sit it looks like nothing more than your own inability to take a firm position because you're one of those very little people who like to play on both sides of the street depending on how the wind blows in order to respond to any issue by saying either, "I didn't vote for that guy" or "I never supported that candidate". And I have little doubt that this is what we'll hear from you over the next 4 years.
And you get all pissy when that fact gets exposed.
https://youtube.com/shorts/dxoaBt_ivI4? ... gUScIn9ORXZeets2 » 26 Sep 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑ It's hardly very complex.
From where I sit it looks like nothing more than your own inability to take a firm position because you're one of those very little people who like to play on both sides of the street depending on how the wind blows in order to respond to any issue by saying either, "I didn't vote for that guy" or "I never supported that candidate". And I have little doubt that this is what we'll hear from you over the next 4 years.
And you get all pissy when that fact gets exposed.
No, it's how it appears to a person who has had far more experience with both other business owners and with hundreds of employees and customers over a 50 year history. It tells me why weak and insecure people like you prefer to live on the fence because you're afraid to take a definite stance.Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2024, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, that is precisely how it would appear to a midwit.
Know what the best childcare program is?Zeets2 » 26 Sep 2024, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ First of all, isn't it a tad disingenuous to claim you are pro-Trump now, after arguing against voting for him just a few weeks ago? Didn't you state with all clarity that you intended to waste your vote on a 3rd party candidate because you had some idiotic reason for despising Trump?
So you think he's a terrible businessman, huh?
How many other businessmen do you know that was able to turn a million-dollar business into a multi-BILLION dollar international organization, then star in a hit TV series for years, and ultimately beat out over a dozen life-long politicians to become President, run as an incumbent and secure more votes than any other Republican in history despite being cheated out of victory, and now take the lead in the polls for a second term as President?
Oh, internet glorious. Why are you so stupid?Zeets2 » 26 Sep 2024, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ No, it's how it appears to a person who has had far more experience with both other business owners and with hundreds of employees and customers over a 50 year history. It tells me why weak and insecure people like you prefer to live on the fence because you're afraid to take a definite stance.
Care to compare your experience with mine, chump?
Obviously, you can't stand it when you realize that other people can see right through your tough guy facade and recognize what a phony blowhard you really are!Cannonpointer » 26 Sep 2024, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, internet glorious. Why are you so stupid?
Just jackoff on someone else's leg, you **** fruit.
Please don't tell anyone!Zeets2 » 26 Sep 2024, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Obviously, you can't stand it when you realize that other people can see right through your tough guy facade and recognize what a phony blowhard you really are!