maineman » 10 Sep 2024, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑ What is the topic of THIS thread? Trying to bring Harris into this thread is nothing but desperate "whataboutism,"
If you want to talk about something other than Trump's child care word salad answer start your own thread.
Easy Peasy.
maineman » 10 Sep 2024, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑ Then why the **** spam this thread when you don't care to discuss the topic?
GTFO
Come on manmaineman » 09 Sep 2024, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑ If you win in November, can you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable? And if so, what specific piece of legislation will you advance?-- Reshma Saujani
"Well, I would do that. And we’re sitting down – you know, I was somebody – we had – Sen. Marco Rubio and my daughter Ivanka were so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that – because, look, child care is child care. It’s – couldn’t – you know, it’s something – you have to have it. In this country, you have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to, but they’ll get used to it very quickly – and it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care. That – it’s going to take care – we’re going to have – I – I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.Because I have to say with child care – I want to stay with child care – but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just – that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in. We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people, and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people, but we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first, it’s about Make America Great Again. We have to do it because right now we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question." Donald Trump
Yeah, nitwit, I'll give you a take!maineman » 09 Sep 2024, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Because, to me, that reads like the ramblings of a demented, buffoon who is incapable of forming a coherent thought, and, instead, just opens up his pie hole and lets the word salad, the verbal diarrhea just flow out.
Any other takes on this?
so....you admit he blathered on and never answered the question posed to him.Zeets2 » 10 Sep 2024, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, nitwit, I'll give you a take!
The ONLY solutions you **** socialist liberals EVER see is throwing more taxpayer money as an answer to every problem!
The solution is to STOP RAISING TAXES ON PEOPLE so they can finally afford to pay for what EACH American needs or wants FOR THEMSELVES!
Trump will cut inflation, cut taxes, and open up the country for more oil and gas drilling and fracking that will bring tens of BILLIONS into this country which will LOWER our energy costs for gas and heat while reducing inflation to the 1.4% he had when HE was in office! Interest rates will drop, and the economy will boom once again as more jobs open up and will pay higher wages than the **** part-time jobs with no benefits that are the only jobs Biden/Harris are making, AND THEY'RE GIVING THOSE TO ILLEGALS YOU **** MORON!
You want cheaper childcare? PAY FOR IT YOUR DAMN SELF WITH THE MONEY YOU SAVE ONCE TRUMP TAKES OFFICE!
And STOP BEGGING FOR MORE SOCIALISM EVERY TIME YOU OPEN YOUR STUPID MOUTH!!!
maineman » 10 Sep 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, and ZEETS, you wouldn't know socialism if it automatically deposited your social security check into your FDIC-insured bank account!
What can be, unburdened by what has beenmaineman » 09 Sep 2024, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑ he was asked a specific question...which is the first sentence of the OP.
His answer is the remainder of the OP.
Can you explain to me how he answered the question?
Yes or No?
maineman » 09 Sep 2024, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I must say that I am not really as clued into the "weave" verbal stylings of Donald Trump. Can any of his scrotum-sucking sycophants on here explain to me what that says?
But you aren't taking a shot at making sense of Grifty's dumbdump...DeezerShoove » 09 Sep 2024, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑ KaKa promotion can't make muster, right?
All you got is Trump stuff.
That is truly laughable validation of KaKa's worth.
Beekeeper » 10 Sep 2024, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ How's it FEEL to be SUCKING DICK CHENEY'S COCK, DAUGHER DIDDLER??
Because you VOTE FOR KommieLA, you are SUCKING CHENEY DICK!! MASSIVELY!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Why is the federal govt needed in child care again?maineman » 09 Sep 2024, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑ If you win in November, can you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable? And if so, what specific piece of legislation will you advance?-- Reshma Saujani
"Well, I would do that. And we’re sitting down – you know, I was somebody – we had – Sen. Marco Rubio and my daughter Ivanka were so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that – because, look, child care is child care. It’s – couldn’t – you know, it’s something – you have to have it. In this country, you have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to, but they’ll get used to it very quickly – and it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care. That – it’s going to take care – we’re going to have – I – I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.Because I have to say with child care – I want to stay with child care – but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just – that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in. We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people, and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people, but we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first, it’s about Make America Great Again. We have to do it because right now we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question." Donald Trump
In the tow of a Sodomite.
Yes, we're producing more oil today SO WHY IS THE COST OF GAS SO MUCH HIGHER, FOOL?maineman » 10 Sep 2024, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑ so....you admit he blathered on and never answered the question posed to him.
thanks for playing.
Oh...and you do realize that the US is producing more fossil fuel today than it ever did under Trump.... don't you?
https://www.statista.com/topics/4231/us ... icOverview
Blackvegetable » 10 Sep 2024, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ But you aren't taking a shot at making sense of Grifty's dumbdump...