You are correct what a bargain for the federal govtmaineman » 12 Sep 2024, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑ and all that time you did all that work for the Army free of charge?
Oh wait.... I bet you actually sucked off the government tit with a paycheck every month, amirite?
*Huey » 12 Sep 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ My conclusions are based on what I saw. You did not watch it. Yours is based on the words of others.
That's nice. That thread is available if you wish to discuss it.
Tiny,*Huey » 12 Sep 2024, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ That's nice. That thread is available if you wish to discuss it.
As far as the debate yhou admitted you did watch it or see it. That means you are relying on the words of others to tell you what to think about it.
Did that cause the post menopausal whatshername to bleed from her wherever?Jantje_Smit » 12 Sep 2024, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ I saw the Ho got another endorsement, that should help..
https://youtu.be/BB6YSlCqOZ8
*Vegas » 12 Sep 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ You haven't. You only read the first 4 words. You get overwhelmed after that.
Will that make FOX any more credible?Zeets2 » 12 Sep 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ You be sure to let us know how that comes out, OK?
As if that somehow would elevate your heroes at CNN in the ratings!
Low T, I saw it. You did not. End of story.Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2024, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
It's about the value of what you claim to see.
I have numerous direct quotes as well.
This again. Should I get your lie out now about Clinton not paying a dime?
For what did I say Clinton "didn't pay a dime", Level 0.27?*Vegas » 12 Sep 2024, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ This again. Should I get your lie out now about Clinton not paying a dime?
Redundant idiot.
Hardly, Tiny.
Everyone who sees you running from that question.
I'm not running from any question.
I read sarcasm as well as any other "nuance" of misdirection.Zeets2 » 12 Sep 2024, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑ How uniquely prescient!
Wait, let me write that down so I don't forget it.
1. This is about the debate.
Run.*Huey » 12 Sep 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ 1. This is about the debate.
2. I told you to go bump the thread where that was discussed and that question was answered, Capt Diversion. I have told you over and over and over and over I am not doing repeats when you feel the need to divert.