Liberal Forum

*Vegas » 13 Sep 2024, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 10:29 am

I tell you what. Since you never answer my questions nor do you provide evidence of your claims, then obviously I don't have to either. 

However, I will on the condition that you answer questions first. Then I will answer yours...and only then. Deal? 

Yeah, I didn't think so...you would never leave your safe space.

However, I will on the condition that you answer questions first

we've tried that..

you lie.

now get on with some specifics, because I have the transcript in front of me.

Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 10:34 am

we've tried that..


 

Nope. You never even made an effort. 

Now try again. Deal? 


 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 13 Sep 2024, 5:13 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 5:13 am

Should Trump leave the race?

And do WHAT? While away his golden years bringing cigarettes and cheap wine to your mom on Friday nights?

 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 13 Sep 2024, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 5:41 am

I did. Disaster   

Haitians eating pets 

Haitians eating pets isn't a "disaster." It's cultural heritage - and we celebrate that. 
 

Cannonpointer » 13 Sep 2024, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 10:57 am

Haitians eating pets isn't a "disaster." It's cultural heritage - and we celebrate that.

 
 

*Vegas » 13 Sep 2024, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 10:35 am

Nope. You never even made an effort. 

Now try again. Deal?

You aren't good for it.

Ever.

Where is that example of Survivorship bias?
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 11:04 am

You aren't good for it.

Ever.

Where is that example of Survivorship bias?

And there is his copout. He is too afraid to leave his safe space, so he blames me. True coward. 

Where is your admission? Here is your video for that: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=12s

*Vegas » 13 Sep 2024, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 11:06 am

And there is his copout. He is too afraid to leave his safe space, so he blames me. True coward. 

Where is your admission? Here is your video for that: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=12s

You were given a definition.

You were to provide an example.

There is no admission due.
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2024, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 11:08 am

You were given a definition.

You were to provide an example.

There is no admission due.

I helped you with the definition. 

You copy/pasted an example, it didn't come from you. As always. Nothing ever does, 

The admission is about you acknowledging that you never knew for almost 3 years. 

*Vegas » 13 Sep 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 11:10 am

I helped you with the definition. 

You copy/pasted an example, it didn't come from you. As always. Nothing ever does, 

The admission is about you acknowledging that you never knew for almost 3 years.

That's ****.

We know it to be so because you cannot even provide an example.

Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 10:34 am

we've tried that..

you lie.

now get on with some specifics, because I have the transcript in front of me.

Bump.


@*VegasVagina is a contemptible lying coward.
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2024, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 11:11 am

That's ****.

We know it to be so because you cannot even provide an example.

Prove I can't. 

I simply require an admission, then you will get all the examples you want. I'll give you more than one. 

Admission! NOW!!!!

*Vegas » 13 Sep 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 11:15 am

Prove I can't. 

I simply require an admission, then you will get all the examples you want. I'll give you more than one. 

Admission! NOW!!!!

You can't and don't require anything.


 

Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2024, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 11:17 am

You can't and don't require anything.

No, I am pretty sure I required it. I know because I was there when I required it. 

*Vegas » 13 Sep 2024, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 11:18 am

No, I am pretty sure I required it. I know because I was there when I required it.

It wasn't about you.

I called your bluff by posting a definition in my own words.

You were to post an example. 


You haven't, because you can't. 

You can't because you're a moron.
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2024, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 11:20 am

It wasn't about you.

I called your bluff by posting a definition in my own words.

 

I helped you with your definition. It also took about 5 months before you got around to doing so. No surprise there. You don't answer questions the first time around. 

You were to post an example. 

Says who? I made it clear that you are to give an admission first, then you get your example. 

I don't care if you don't like it. Not my problem.

 

*Vegas » 13 Sep 2024, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 11:22 am

I helped you with your definition. It also took about 5 months before you got around to doing so. No surprise there. You don't answer questions the first time around. 

Says who? I made it clear that you are to give an admission first, then you get your example. 

I don't care if you don't like it. Not my problem.

You cannot have helped me with the definition because you have no idea what it is.

As demonstrated by the fact that you cannot even post an example.
 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 13 Sep 2024, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 5:41 am

I did. Disaster   

Haitians eating pets 

I saw one sucking on a drumstick that still had a dewclaw.
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 11:24 am

You cannot have helped me with the definition because you have no idea what it is.

As demonstrated by the fact that you cannot even post an example.

Again, we already went over this. God man. Ok, I will begin my punishment now. I'll wait until your next OP to begin. 

@Deezer Shoove  I need to give Veghead some punishment. His redundancy is over the top again. He is always redundant, but it's in overdrive today, so I need to whip him into submission again. Technically, it won't fit the definition of spam, but it will still be just as obnoxious. 

*Vegas » 13 Sep 2024, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2024, 11:29 am

Again, we already went over this. God man. Ok, I will begin my punishment now. I'll wait until your next OP to begin. 

@Deezer Shoove  I need to give Veghead some punishment. His redundancy is over the top again. He is always redundant, but it's in overdrive today, so I need to whip him into submission again. Technically, it won't fit the definition of spam, but it will still be just as obnoxious.

It isn't a matter of interpretation.

It is a matter of facts.

You can't provide an example, because you are clinically stupid.