*Vegas » 13 Sep 2024, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑ I tell you what. Since you never answer my questions nor do you provide evidence of your claims, then obviously I don't have to either.
However, I will on the condition that you answer questions first. Then I will answer yours...and only then. Deal?
Yeah, I didn't think so...you would never leave your safe space.
we've tried that..However, I will on the condition that you answer questions first
Nope. You never even made an effort.
And do WHAT? While away his golden years bringing cigarettes and cheap wine to your mom on Friday nights?
Haitians eating pets isn't a "disaster." It's cultural heritage - and we celebrate that.
Cannonpointer » 13 Sep 2024, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑ Haitians eating pets isn't a "disaster." It's cultural heritage - and we celebrate that.
You aren't good for it.
Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ You aren't good for it.
Ever.
Where is that example of Survivorship bias?
You were given a definition.*Vegas » 13 Sep 2024, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑ And there is his copout. He is too afraid to leave his safe space, so he blames me. True coward.
Where is your admission? Here is your video for that:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=12s
Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2024, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑ You were given a definition.
You were to provide an example.
There is no admission due.
That's ****.*Vegas » 13 Sep 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ I helped you with the definition.
You copy/pasted an example, it didn't come from you. As always. Nothing ever does,
The admission is about you acknowledging that you never knew for almost 3 years.
Bump.Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ we've tried that..
you lie.
now get on with some specifics, because I have the transcript in front of me.
Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2024, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ That's ****.
We know it to be so because you cannot even provide an example.
You can't and don't require anything.*Vegas » 13 Sep 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑ Prove I can't.
I simply require an admission, then you will get all the examples you want. I'll give you more than one.
Admission! NOW!!!!
It wasn't about you.*Vegas » 13 Sep 2024, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ No, I am pretty sure I required it. I know because I was there when I required it.
I helped you with your definition. It also took about 5 months before you got around to doing so. No surprise there. You don't answer questions the first time around.Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2024, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ It wasn't about you.
I called your bluff by posting a definition in my own words.
Says who? I made it clear that you are to give an admission first, then you get your example.You were to post an example.
You cannot have helped me with the definition because you have no idea what it is.*Vegas » 13 Sep 2024, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ I helped you with your definition. It also took about 5 months before you got around to doing so. No surprise there. You don't answer questions the first time around.
Says who? I made it clear that you are to give an admission first, then you get your example.
I don't care if you don't like it. Not my problem.
I saw one sucking on a drumstick that still had a dewclaw.
Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ You cannot have helped me with the definition because you have no idea what it is.
As demonstrated by the fact that you cannot even post an example.
It isn't a matter of interpretation.*Vegas » 13 Sep 2024, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Again, we already went over this. God man. Ok, I will begin my punishment now. I'll wait until your next OP to begin.
@Deezer Shoove I need to give Veghead some punishment. His redundancy is over the top again. He is always redundant, but it's in overdrive today, so I need to whip him into submission again. Technically, it won't fit the definition of spam, but it will still be just as obnoxious.