You asked me to SPECULATE. THAT is not "thinking". THINING involves taking the FACTS AT HAND and drawing logical conclusions from those facts. AND I never asked you for a single "Fact" of any kind. ONLY that FACTS be used to draw a conclusion based on those same facts and not your specious speculation.Cannonpointer » 13 Sep 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑ What I asked you to do - and what you refused to do - was think.
I have no obligation to "show you the facts." A man learns more by THINKING than by listening - Google, "Socratic method." What comes into your ears is untreated manure 95% of your life. That is the nature of our world. And so, rather than assault your ears, I INVITED YOU TO THINK. I actually said, in English, that this was something for you to try on - to give consideration to. I did not tell you what conclusion to reach. I just said, pretend you found this out, and wanted to understand it - what would you then conclude?
And you blew up, because you were being dared to think for yourself instead of plaintively demanding "facts" from me - as if I have some **** access to information that you do not. Well, I don't. I have access to the same information that you do. But when I am invited to THINK, I do not take it as an insult, or call **** on the guy inviting me to consider another angle on the issue. I just consider the **** angle, and tell the guy what I think, based on the matter he respectfully asked me to consider.
You brought it to this. I was perfectly respectful in that post, and I merely invited you to consider a particular angle, and see for yourself what conclusions you might draw. And you lost your mud.
Now, go back to begging for the "facts," you persistent mediocrity. Stay stupid my friend.
It's not just CNNLOL, the whole election circus is a psy-op, I saw it happening but I still can't believe how the Ho became the chosen one out of nowhere.. she was the most impopular VP in history, no one voted for her, then the senile puppet was suddenly dumped.. lol... ok, I could see that coming.. and a few days later she is the most promising black female candidate ever, no questions asked.. I admire the propaganda but wtf????Cannonpointer » 13 Sep 2024, 10:02 pm » wrote: ↑ And now CNN is fact checking KAMALA - "Fact checking" AFTER the debate. This is just to rub our noses in it. They are not clearing the air - they are farting it up. The intention is to corrupt democrats and enrage republicans. This is a psy-op.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtufSRX5yEk

The gullible, like Mainedunce and BV, are easily duped by hoaxes and disinformation.Jantje_Smit » 14 Sep 2024, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑ It's not just CNNLOL, the whole election circus is a psy-op, I saw it happening but I still can't believe how the Ho became the chosen one out of nowhere.. she was the most impopular VP in history, no one voted for her, then the senile puppet was suddenly dumped.. lol... ok, I could see that coming.. and a few days later she is the most promising black female candidate ever, no questions asked.. I admire the propaganda but wtf????
![]()
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Jantje_Smit » 14 Sep 2024, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑ It's not just CNNLOL, the whole election circus is a psy-op, I saw it happening but I still can't believe how the Ho became the chosen one out of nowhere.. she was the most impopular VP in history, no one voted for her, then the senile puppet was suddenly dumped.. lol... ok, I could see that coming.. and a few days later she is the most promising black female candidate ever, no questions asked.. I admire the propaganda but wtf????
![]()

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Now that's an understatement if there every was one.RebelGator » 14 Sep 2024, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑ The gullible, like Mainedunce and BV, are easily duped by hoaxes and disinformation.
*Beekeeper » 13 Sep 2024, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑ You can waste all the time you want in speculation and ****.
Show me actual FACTS to draw conclusions from and I'll garner the CORRECT conclusion a vast majority of the time, YOU on the other hand, get weighed down in a cesspool of crap you "speculated" over, and you got NOTHING concrete to be constructive WITH.
Play STUPID all you want. FACTS MATTER and you can always kick SPECULATION in the *** with those.
Apparently it isn't true!
Says everything about today's society...sad...DeezerShoove » 14 Sep 2024, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑Someone just has to say "Squirrel!" and we lose what little focus we can occasionally muster.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Link?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Thinking involves speculations, you retard.*Beekeeper » 14 Sep 2024, 4:41 am » wrote: ↑You asked me to SPECULATE. THAT is not "thinking".Cannonpointer » 13 Sep 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑ What I asked you to do - and what you refused to do - was think.
I have no obligation to "show you the facts." A man learns more by THINKING than by listening - Google, "Socratic method." What comes into your ears is untreated manure 95% of your life. That is the nature of our world. And so, rather than assault your ears, I INVITED YOU TO THINK. I actually said, in English, that this was something for you to try on - to give consideration to. I did not tell you what conclusion to reach. I just said, pretend you found this out, and wanted to understand it - what would you then conclude?
And you blew up, because you were being dared to think for yourself instead of plaintively demanding "facts" from me - as if I have some **** access to information that you do not. Well, I don't. I have access to the same information that you do. But when I am invited to THINK, I do not take it as an insult, or call **** on the guy inviting me to consider another angle on the issue. I just consider the **** angle, and tell the guy what I think, based on the matter he respectfully asked me to consider.
You brought it to this. I was perfectly respectful in that post, and I merely invited you to consider a particular angle, and see for yourself what conclusions you might draw. And you lost your mud.
Now, go back to begging for the "facts," you persistent mediocrity. Stay stupid my friend.
The "facts at hand" are precisely what I invited you to consider, from your blind spot. You got hysterical.*Beekeeper » 14 Sep 2024, 4:41 am » wrote: ↑THINING involves taking the FACTS AT HAND and drawing logical conclusions from those facts.
Cannonpointer » 14 Sep 2024, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ Thinking involves speculations, you retard.
[ spek-yuh-leyt ]
Phonetic (Standard)
verb (used without object)
, spec·u·lat·ed, spec·u·lat·ing.
to engage in thought or reflection; meditate (often followed by on, upon, or a clause).
Synonyms: cogitate, reflect, think
The "facts at hand" are precisely what I invited you to consider, from your blind spot. You got hysterical.
Being asked to think reactivates you, brings out the woman.
No, no, weakness.*Beekeeper » 14 Sep 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ I find it best not to take any advice from NAZIS and COMMIE/SOCIALISTS.
So run along and spew your **** on someone else's commentary.
Leading Report has a very low reliability rating unless you are into conspiracy theories.
Scandals were going on for thousands of years and hundreds of generations ancestral lineages believing life wasn't self evident due to genetic timing of ancestral positions daily.
No
Babbling bastard! Die!31st Arrival » 13 Sep 2024, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑ More reasonable doubt campaign by every reality working against this species from within this species. Ancestors in a civil war against their own ancestries.