Liberal Forum

How come they didn’t select someone like Michelle “Big Mike” Obama or Oprah Winfrey to be their nominee? 

Half of Americans would SWOON over those two.

You would see 1980s level of voter participation.

Trump would be defeated in a landslide. 

Instead we have the Hindu-Negro mix?? 

??????

   

WTF! 

It seems like (((THEY))) want Trump in office again. Why else would they pick a candidate like Harris? 

(((THEY))) must be sabotaging the Democrats on PURPOSE, while making it seem as though they are sabotaging Trump.

LowIQTrash » 16 Sep 2024, 12:20 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 12:20 am

How come they didn’t select someone like Michelle “Big Mike” Obama or Oprah Winfrey to be their nominee? 

Half of Americans would SWOON over those two.

You would see 1980s level of voter participation.

Trump would be defeated in a landslide. 

Instead we have the Hindu-Negro mix?? 

??????

   

WTF! 

It seems like (((THEY))) want Trump in office again. Why else would they pick a candidate like Harris? 

(((THEY))) must be sabotaging the Democrats on PURPOSE, while making it seem as though they are sabotaging Trump.

As you and others have alluded (I tend to agree) KaKa is a purposeful poison pill.
Let Trump and the Republicans take the heat of the next four years.
She happens to win (using Biden's war chest) so be it. Costs basically nothing to try.
"Stupid" money spends the same. Are donors really expecting her to payback somehow?

Deezer Shoove » 16 Sep 2024, 5:51 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 5:51 am

As you and others have alluded (I tend to agree) KaKa is a purposeful poison pill.
Let Trump and the Republicans take the heat of the next four years.
She happens to win (using Biden's war chest) so be it. Costs basically nothing to try.
"Stupid" money spends the same. Are donors really expecting her to payback somehow?

3 ring circus under one big tent. What was the key slogan from P.T. Barnum? "There is a new sucker born every minute." to replace the fools lived last 4 generations so far.

People willing to believe anything is possible will spend every day alive wishing tomorrow wasn't today again.

LowIQTrash » 16 Sep 2024, 12:20 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 12:20 am

How come they didn’t select someone like Michelle “Big Mike” Obama or Oprah Winfrey to be their nominee? 

Half of Americans would SWOON over those two.

You would see 1980s level of voter participation.

Trump would be defeated in a landslide. 

Instead we have the Hindu-Negro mix?? 

??????

   

WTF! 

It seems like (((THEY))) want Trump in office again. Why else would they pick a candidate like Harris? 

(((THEY))) must be sabotaging the Democrats on PURPOSE, while making it seem as though they are sabotaging Trump.

Flip side of that coin? If you own the counting software, you don't NEED popularity. And shoving someone despised down our throats - as we have gleefully done to at least a dozen "developing" countries - brings them great delight.

I suspect that you bring no spiritual component to your analysis. In your mind, the people doing this are fully human and not part demon. 

That produces a mighty gap in your understanding of the beast.

We only have about 7 weeks before we will know whose read is accurate - but I wanna go on record betting you one greenie, to be delivered through the profile, so that the victor gets a you-are-the-lucky-lucky from Ronjul. 
 

DeezerShoove » 16 Sep 2024, 5:51 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 5:51 am

As you and others have alluded (I tend to agree) KaKa is a purposeful poison pill.
Let Trump and the Republicans take the heat of the next four years.
She happens to win (using Biden's war chest) so be it. Costs basically nothing to try.
"Stupid" money spends the same. Are donors really expecting her to payback somehow?

The deep state has a choice between a raging bull that they've tried to kill, and a known knee-pad Patty who will ask how far when commanded to jump. She is LITERALLY a person whose rise has been fueled by her cocksucking prowess.

And you think they're picking the one that gets off script and off leash and considers himself the reincarnation of Sun Tsu?
 
 

Cannonpointer » 16 Sep 2024, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 8:46 am

The deep state has a choice between a raging bull that they've tried to kill, and a known knee-pad Patty who will ask how far when commanded to jump. She is LITERALLY a person whose rise has been fueled by her cocksucking prowess.

And you think they're picking the one that gets off script and off leash and considers himself the reincarnation of Sun Tsu?

If he becomes president again, they will try (again) to dump every problem into his lap as his doing.
If she gets in, she will... you already said.

I merely pointed out others theorizing she might be a poison pill. Why isn't that a possibility?
They win either way.   

LowIQTrash » 16 Sep 2024, 12:20 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 12:20 am

How come they didn’t select someone like Michelle “Big Mike” Obama or Oprah Winfrey to be their nominee? 

Half of Americans would SWOON over those two.

You would see 1980s level of voter participation.

Trump would be defeated in a landslide. 

Instead we have the Hindu-Negro mix?? 

??????

   

WTF! 

It seems like (((THEY))) want Trump in office again. Why else would they pick a candidate like Harris? 

(((THEY))) must be sabotaging the Democrats on PURPOSE, while making it seem as though they are sabotaging Trump.

They could have nominated  Koko The Gorilla to run against Trump instead of Harris and I think Koko would have improved their chances of victory...
[well except for the fact dat Koko be daid nsheet]
 

DeezerShoove » 16 Sep 2024, 5:51 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 5:51 am

As you and others have alluded (I tend to agree) KaKa is a purposeful poison pill.
Let Trump and the Republicans take the heat of the next four years.
She happens to win (using Biden's war chest) so be it. Costs basically nothing to try.
"Stupid" money spends the same. Are donors really expecting her to payback somehow?

 

Good points....

Another view is if they replaced her it is an admission that she is not capable, ready, for the job.  
 

DeezerShoove » 16 Sep 2024, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 8:54 am

If he becomes president again, they will try (again) to dump every problem into his lap as his doing.
If she gets in, she will... you already said.

I merely pointed out others theorizing she might be a poison pill. Why isn't that a possibility?
They win either way. 

I do not believe for an instant they will ever let him back into the white house. I might have to eat some crow, but I highly doubt it.

He is a cypher. They have no idea what that **** will say or do. He gets off leash. She is not just manageable - she's earnestly subservient. It's a night and day choice. And IMO, the fiction that they need anyone to blame is about to be blown up, when they complete the militarization of the state and set loose the army they imported and stationed throughout the country right in front of our eyes.

Riddle me this: If they wanted him as a patsy, why did they try to kill him?
 

*Huey » 16 Sep 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 9:30 am

Good points....

Another view is if they replaced her it is an admission that she is not capable, ready, for the job.

Those good points rather fail to explain why, if the deep state wanted to scape-goat Trump, they tried to murder him. 
 

LowIQTrash » 16 Sep 2024, 12:20 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 12:20 am

How come they didn’t select someone like Michelle “Big Mike” Obama or Oprah Winfrey to be their nominee? 

Half of Americans would SWOON over those two.

You would see 1980s level of voter participation.

Trump would be defeated in a landslide. 

Instead we have the Hindu-Negro mix?? 

??????

   

WTF! 

It seems like (((THEY))) want Trump in office again. Why else would they pick a candidate like Harris? 

(((THEY))) must be sabotaging the Democrats on PURPOSE, while making it seem as though they are sabotaging Trump.

No, it was all about the money.
If the DNC DIDN'T select Kameltoe, they would not have been permitted to use the $100+ million in donations he had already received during the primaries.

And no, they DON'T want Trump!
They're hoping against hope that some nut has been inflamed enough by their hateful rhetoric that he'll be assassinated, just as was tried again yesterday.
 

Zeets2 » 16 Sep 2024, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 9:45 am

No, it was all about the money.
If the DNC DIDN'T select Kameltoe, they would not have been permitted to use the $100+ million in donations he had already received during the primaries.

Pshaw. They own the money tree.

Besides, they have a trillion dollars worth of dishonest free media. They don't NEED campaign cash.

Not to mention, the money would revert to DNC coffers. The DNC would LOVE to have control of that money.

Zeets2 » 16 Sep 2024, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 9:45 am

And no, they DON'T want Trump!
They're hoping against hope that some nut has been inflamed enough by their hateful rhetoric that he'll be assassinated, just as was tried again yesterday.

Agreed.

If they wanted Trump, trying to murder him was a stupid way of showing it.

Cannonpointer » 16 Sep 2024, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 10:03 am

Pshaw. They own the money tree.

Besides, they have a trillion dollars worth of dishonest free media. They don't NEED campaign cash.

Not to mention, the money would revert to DNC coffers. The DNC would LOVE to have control of that money.

Agreed.

If they wanted Trump, trying to murder him was a stupid way of showing it.

Assassinating Trump is the only option they have left.

And I don't believe they're done trying, after now failing twice!
 

Cannonpointer » 16 Sep 2024, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 10:03 am

Pshaw. They own the money tree.

Besides, they have a trillion dollars worth of dishonest free media. They don't NEED campaign cash.

Not to mention, the money would revert to DNC coffers. The DNC would LOVE to have control of that money.

Not quite:

Biden is out of the 2024 race. What happens to his campaign donations?
Kamala Harris is the only Democrat who could seamlessly access Biden’s hundreds of millions in campaign cash.
Vox by Nicole Narea Jul 21, 2024

It would be difficult for another Democrat to challenge Harris, given that she now has Biden’s endorsement and the support of millions of Americans who already voted for the Biden-Harris ticket. So even if there is an open process either at the Democratic Convention or before it, Harris would have a good shot at winning the nomination.But if she doesn’t and drops off the ticket entirely, she and Biden couldn’t just transfer their millions to another Democrat. Campaign finance laws impose a limit of only $2,000 per election for transfers from one candidate to another. There are a few potential workarounds, but it is unlikely that any would allow the new candidate to take full advantage of the value of Biden’s campaign coffers. For one, Biden could “offer to refund the money to donors who could then contribute to the new candidate’s campaign,” Ghosh said. But this is an unreliable method: Refunding the money to donors is no guarantee that they will contribute to the Democratic ticket again and relies on them to do the legwork.

Now we both know that the corrupt Democrat party would NEVER let campaign laws stand in their way with that kind of money on the line.  I have no doubt that with the backing of their corrupt DOJ, they'd find a liberal court to rule in their favor on that law.

The only question would be how pissed off that would make the Democrats who donated that money to Biden, and whether or not they too can take them to court over their illegal appropriation of their money, and how badly doing that would anger millions of voters, particularly those who were still on the fence over such blatant thievery.
 
 

Zeets2 » 16 Sep 2024, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 10:17 am

Not quite:

Now we both know that the corrupt Democrat party would NEVER let campaign laws stand in their way with that kind of money on the line.  I have no doubt that with the backing of their corrupt DOJ, they'd find a liberal court to rule in their favor on that law.

The only question would be how pissed off that would make the Democrats who donated that money to Biden, and whether or not they too can take them to court over their illegal appropriation of their money, and how badly doing that would anger millions of voters, particularly those who were still on the fence over such blatant thievery.

The money would go into the DNC, which would use it independently of the candidate. Again, when you get billions and billions of dollars worth of dishonest media just handed to you, AND you control the counting, how much money does the candidate really need? 

Are you aware of Kamala campaigning? I'm not. Do you think she needs to run commercials, when the actual PROGRAMMING belongs to those who hold her strings? I don't.

I think the campaign cash is a shiny distraction - a plausible denial of the REAL reason they chose camela instead of mike or oprah or anyone else. The real reason is to rub our noses in it. They already hit us with a derelict and demented old pervert who sexually abused his own children. Imposing willy brown's blowjob queen on us delights the demons. Her absolute lack of qualifications make them roar with laughter as they put her over us. 

Don't mistake a spiritual battle for a political one. Politics are merely the means. The spiritual destruction of the United States is the actual agenda.
 
 

Trump may get assassinated before the election. So...Kamala will again get an election handed to her without earning it. 

Cannonpointer » 16 Sep 2024, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 8:44 am

Flip side of that coin? If you own the counting software, you don't NEED popularity. And shoving someone despised down our throats - as we have gleefully done to at least a dozen "developing" countries - brings them great delight.

I suspect that you bring no spiritual component to your analysis. In your mind, the people doing this are fully human and not part demon. 

That produces a mighty gap in your understanding of the beast.

We only have about 7 weeks before we will know whose read is accurate - but I wanna go on record betting you one greenie, to be delivered through the profile, so that the victor gets a you-are-the-lucky-lucky from Ronjul.

We’ll have to wait and see in Nov. I still have little doubts Kamala was dragged into the spotlight so the Dems would lose - all planned in advance.

(((THEY))) have very devious minds and would never make their intentions obvious. Nominating a  tepid candidate like KH is a huge red flag.

DeezerShoove » 16 Sep 2024, 5:51 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 5:51 am

As you and others have alluded (I tend to agree) KaKa is a purposeful poison pill.
Let Trump and the Republicans take the heat of the next four years.
She happens to win (using Biden's war chest) so be it. Costs basically nothing to try.
"Stupid" money spends the same. Are donors really expecting her to payback somehow?

The other reason is that a Trump victory would restore “faith in our republic / democracy” as Trumpy supporters would be convinced the system is no longer “rigged” against them - whatever that means.

It would also ensure R “Eggplant” Suave gets to gloat when Trump is in office when stock market crashes.    I can see that coming by late next yr. 
 

Trump should have selected Nikki as vp this would all be over

Cannonpointer » 16 Sep 2024, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 9:31 am

I do not believe for an instant they will ever let him back into the white house. I might have to eat some crow, but I highly doubt it.

He is a cypher. They have no idea what that **** will say or do. He gets off leash. She is not just manageable - she's earnestly subservient. It's a night and day choice. And IMO, the fiction that they need anyone to blame is about to be blown up, when they complete the militarization of the state and set loose the army they imported and stationed throughout the country right in front of our eyes.

Riddle me this: If they wanted him as a patsy, why did they try to kill him?

Of course they don't WANT him. She's a door mat, no question.
I think my (and others') notion is just as plausible:
They will work with whatever human gets in.

Shooting was easier than an argumentative scapegoat.
But a'scapegoatin' they will go if necessary.