Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 6:53 am

TinyStupid, 

Focus.

Harris has been part of a top 15 administration...OF COURSE, she would be expected to continue the policies of a top third president.

This isn't like 2xWorse than Buchanan running on the same 2016 nonplatform in 2020.

Or running against a major element of it in 2024.

 


 

Harris has been part of a top 15 administration...OF COURSE, she would be expected to continue the policies of a top third president.

Interesting.....but yet she is running on hope and change and a new way forward.


CHICAGO — She's been vice president for 3½ years, but this week Kamala Harris re-introduced herself to the nation as an agent of hope and change — and cast former President Trump as yesterday's news.


 Why it matters: Harris' promise of a "new way forward" — wrapped in "joy" and an optimistic America defined by freedom, equality and opportunity — is meant to contrast with Trump's dark view of what he calls a nation in decline.


https://www.axios.com/2024/08/23/kamala ... ope-change

'We shouldn't need change or a new way forward.  


Go ahead and attack the source.  
 

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 7:01 am

Interesting.....but yet she is running on hope and change and a new way forward.

CHICAGO — She's been vice president for 3½ years, but this week Kamala Harris re-introduced herself to the nation as an agent of hope and change — and cast former President Trump as yesterday's news.

 Why it matters: Harris' promise of a "new way forward" — wrapped in "joy" and an optimistic America defined by freedom, equality and opportunity — is meant to contrast with Trump's dark view of what he calls a nation in decline.

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/23/kamala ... ope-change

'We shouldn't need change or a new way forward.  

Go ahead and attack the source.

Is she repeating or changing?

Take a stand, Usefool.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 7:04 am

Is she repeating or changing?

Take a stand, Usefool.
 

 

Askholio, she is running on change and a new way forward.  I already said that. 

As did Axios.  With a top 15 Admin you don't need to change anything.
 

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 7:06 am

Askholio, she is running on change and a new way forward.  I already said that. 

As did Axios.  With a top 15 Admin you don't need to change anything.

What was your original "case", Dana's Clown?

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 7:07 am

What was your original "case", Dana's Clown?

SMH.

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 7:39 am

SMH.

Run..

 

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 7:01 am

Interesting.....but yet she is running on hope and change and a new way forward.

CHICAGO — She's been vice president for 3½ years, but this week Kamala Harris re-introduced herself to the nation as an agent of hope and change — and cast former President Trump as yesterday's news.

 Why it matters: Harris' promise of a "new way forward" — wrapped in "joy" and an optimistic America defined by freedom, equality and opportunity — is meant to contrast with Trump's dark view of what he calls a nation in decline.

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/23/kamala ... ope-change

'We shouldn't need change or a new way forward.  

Go ahead and attack the source.

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 7:47 am

Run..

My original comment made to someone else was her campaign simply copied and pasted the issues from the Biden/Harris site.

You have done nothing to dispute that. 

If you wish to talk about running, that it is.

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 6:53 am

TinyStupid, 

Focus.

Harris has been part of a top 15 administration...OF COURSE, she would be expected to continue the policies of a top third president.

This isn't like 2xWorse than Buchanan running on the same 2016 nonplatform in 2020.

Or running against a major element of it in 2024.

Federal Debt Is Soaring. Here’s Why Trump and Harris Aren’t Talking About It.
Both candidates were part of administrations that produced growing deficits. Neither is likely to reverse that trend if elected.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/fed ... verage_web
 

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 8:47 am

My original comment made to someone else was her campaign simply copied and pasted the issues from the Biden/Harris site.

You have done nothing to dispute that. 

If you wish to talk about running, that it is.

Don't stop running..

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 8:53 am

Federal Debt Is Soaring. Here’s Why Trump and Harris Aren’t Talking About It.
Both candidates were part of administrations that produced growing deficits. Neither is likely to reverse that trend if elected.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/fed ... verage_web

How many of the Presidents endorsed by the WSJ bequeathed smaller deficits than they inherited?

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 9:15 am

Don't stop running..

Wait for it.

*Huey » 16 Sep 2024, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2024, 2:32 pm

Apparently, her campaign did a copy/paste job for the Biden/Harris site.  Not much detail.

@Blackvegetable  

As I said, my first comment.  
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 9:16 am

How many of the Presidents endorsed by the WSJ bequeathed smaller deficits than they inherited?

We are talking about Harris and Trump.  At least I am.  If there is a point you would like to make feel free. But blame yourself for derailing your thread.

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 9:24 am

We are talking about Harris and Trump.  At least I am.  If there is a point you would like to make feel free. But blame yourself for derailing your thread.

You cited the WSJ lamenting the consequences of fiscal policy they have consistently endorsed.


That is a bullet proof point lodged against your cut&paste.

Nod.

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 9:22 am

Wait for it.

I ask you for words, and you refuse to post them....

You divert, tag, and offer irrelevance.

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 9:28 am

I ask you for words, and you refuse to post them....

You divert, tag, and offer irrelevance.

I gave you my very 1st post.  Take it or leave it, Troll.  Since you have nothing to offer I guess I am done.
 

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 9:30 am

I gave you my very 1st post.  Take it or leave it, Troll.  Since you have nothing to offer I guess I am done.

I offered a response to your post and a trenchant observation regarding your citation.

You've run, yapping.

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 9:16 am

How many of the Presidents endorsed by the WSJ bequeathed smaller deficits than they inherited?

Other then Trump there are no former presidents on the ballot.  So, as it pertains to the fact that neither candidate has a plan to reduce current debt your question is not relevant.  So you reframe you don't have to criticize you chosen candidate.

Nod.  

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 10:14 am

Other then Trump there are no former presidents on the ballot.  So, as it pertains to the fact that neither candidate has a plan to reduce current debt your question is not relevant.  So you reframe you don't have to criticize you chosen candidate.

Nod.

Tiny,

Please stop presuming to parse Relevance...you're an imbecile.