Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 10:32 am

Tiny,

Please stop presuming to parse Relevance...you're an imbecile.

Nah, you are a diverting troll.

You are afraid to criticize Kamala as you were afraid to criticize Biden as you were to criticize Obama.  So you divert, run, hide, avoid and ask questions that are not relevant.

 

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 10:41 am

Nah, you are a diverting troll.

You are afraid to criticize Kamala as you were afraid to criticize Biden as you were to criticize Obama.  So you divert, run, hide, avoid and ask questions that are not relevant.

If Biden is rated 14th and Grifty is, again, worse than Buchanan, who among the two us has the most reason to be critical of our choice?

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 10:44 am

If Biden is rated 14th and Grifty is, again, worse than Buchanan, who among the two us has the most reason to be critical of our choice?

There ya go again.  Afraid to criticize.  Your excuse?  Other presidents did it also.

Again, Biden is not running.  Harris is.  And the Wall Street Journal says Harris and Trump's respective plans will increase debt.  Although she copied and pasted Biden's plans.

Which leads me back to my other point.  If everything is so rosy why is she running on joy, change and a new way forward?  No need to answer.  It is rhetorical.

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 10:49 am

There ya go again.  Afraid to criticize.  Your excuse?  Other presidents did it also.

Again, Biden is not running.  Harris is.  And the Wall Street Journal says Harris and Trump's respective plans will increase debt.  Although she copied and pasted Biden's plans.

Which leads me back to my other point.  If everything is so rosy why is she running on joy, change and a new way forward?  No need to answer.  It is rhetorical.

Why not just answer, Keystrokes Too Far?


 

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 11:43 am

Why not just answer, Keystrokes Too Far?

Answering YOUR questions that are not relevant allows YOU to run down your rabbit hole and avoid what is being discussed.

Now, if this all you are going to do to avoid my initial comments, have fun.

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 12:15 pm

Answering YOUR questions that are not relevant allows YOU to run down your rabbit hole and avoid what is being discussed.

Now, if this all you are going to do to avoid my initial comments, have fun.

The answer is

"Not a single one in our lifetime, Master. I don't know why anyone would pay any attention to them."


Nod.





 

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 12:38 pm

The answer is

"Not a single one in our lifetime, Master. I don't know why anyone would pay any attention to them."

Nod.

Cool.

Now back to the fact your candidate has plans that will increase the debt further.  It suddenly more and more debt is just AOk with you.
 

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 12:49 pm

Cool.

Now back to the fact your candidate has plans that will increase the debt further.  It suddenly more and more debt is just AOk with you.

It suddenly more and more debt is just AOk with you

No....but I understand that some debt expansion is natural as the size of the economy expands.

What's less AOK is the excessive debt which results from the Supply Side Idiocy promoted by WSJ and enabled with your proud votes.

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm

No....but I understand that some debt expansion is natural as the size of the economy expands.

What's less AOK is the excessive debt which results from the Supply Side Idiocy promoted by WSJ and enabled with your proud votes.

Keep running from your candidate.  Did I ever tell you I voted for Clinton?  Twice?

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 12:49 pm

Cool.

Now back to the fact your candidate has plans that will increase the debt further.  It suddenly more and more debt is just AOk with you.

Do you have a candidate?

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 2:26 pm

Do you have a candidate?

This isn't about my choice, Askholio.  This is about the two who have the biggest chance of winning.

Now, we know from past records that between you and I, I am the only one who criticized the spending of BOTH of the administrations they were part of.

What you do is ask divert type questions to avoid it.  

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 2:29 pm

This isn't about my choice, Askholio.  This is about the two who have the biggest chance of winning.

Now, we know from past records that between you and I, I am the only one who criticized the spending of BOTH of the administrations they were part of.

What you do is ask divert type questions to avoid it.

I assume that you are, once again, declining to take a stand.

between you and I, I am the only one who criticized the spending of BOTH of the administrations they were part of.

That's very funny....you claim to have voted for Clinton, twice....but complain that his budget cuts "decimated the military". You complained about Grifty's COVID spending (because you're an idiot), but cast a 2nd proud vote for him, regardless...

One of us has only voted for presidents under whom deficits fell...you've enabled the most profligate administrations in history.

Does your citation rank the fiscal damage expected from both candidates?
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 6:03 pm

I assume that you are, once again, declining to take a stand.

That's very funny....you claim to have voted for Clinton, twice....but complain that his budget cuts "decimated the military". You complained about Grifty's COVID spending (because you're an idiot), but cast a 2nd proud vote for him, regardless...

One of us has only voted for presidents under whom deficits fell...you've enabled the most profligate administrations in history.

Does your citation rank the fiscal damage expected from both candidates?

Run, Bitch, Run.

*Huey » 18 Sep 2024, 4:58 am » wrote: ↑

18 Sep 2024, 4:58 am

Run, Bitch, Run.

I'd say that pretty much nailed it.

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2024, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 10:44 am

If Biden is rated 14th and Grifty is, again, worse than Buchanan, who among the two us has the most reason to be critical of our choice?

 

*Huey » 17 Sep 2024, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2024, 10:49 am

There ya go again.  Afraid to criticize.  Your excuse?  Other presidents did it also.

Again, Biden is not running.  Harris is.  And the Wall Street Journal says Harris and Trump's respective plans will increase debt.  Although she copied and pasted Biden's plans.

Which leads me back to my other point.  If everything is so rosy why is she running on joy, change and a new way forward?  No need to answer.  It is rhetorical.

 

Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2024, 5:22 am » wrote: ↑

18 Sep 2024, 5:22 am

I'd say that pretty much nailed it.

as usual it does, runner...

Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2024, 5:22 am » wrote: ↑

18 Sep 2024, 5:22 am

I'd say that pretty much nailed it.

 

Yeah, you pretty much nailed your dick to the table. 

*Huey » 18 Sep 2024, 6:46 am » wrote: ↑

18 Sep 2024, 6:46 am

Yeah, you pretty much nailed your dick to the table.

You put your head on the block, and I just dropped the axe.

Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2024, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

18 Sep 2024, 6:51 am

You put your head on the block, and I just dropped the axe.

 

Shrug