****!Blackvegetable » 23 Sep 2024, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑ The point being that she was driven to measures she wouldn't otherwise have to take.
Spare me your cretin.Majik » 23 Sep 2024, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑ ****!
Kamala lied about the circumstances....
Just like you are lying now about the circumstances...
Nobody was driven to take an abortion pill.....
They did that by their own volition....
Blackvegetable » 23 Sep 2024, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decided that the right to privacy implied in the 14th Amendment protected abortion as a fundamental right
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/ ... tion-cases
Spare you?
No, I didn't.Majik » 23 Sep 2024, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Spare you?
There is no sparing you...
You got caught lying about the circumstances ....period.
Nod.
What do you think you are getting at, Cooze?
Yes , you did....
Trump doesn't tell the individual States how they should legislate abortion you 70 IQ POS.....
How many negro babies do you reckon that the very stupid overturning of Roe v Wade bees live today instead of bees daid nsheet...?Blackvegetable » 23 Sep 2024, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑ WASHINGTON — Donald Trump took credit Wednesday for the elimination of Roe v. Wade, embracing his role in selecting the Supreme Court justices who were instrumental in ending the half-century precedent that protected abortion rights nationwide.
“After 50 years of failure, with nobody coming even close, I was able to kill Roe v. Wade, much to the ‘shock’ of everyone,” Trump, the former president and front-runner for the 2024 Republican nomination, said on his social media platform.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald ... -rcna84897
He clearly was and is taking credit for it.*Huey » 23 Sep 2024, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑ That's nice.
The comment I responded to was a yes or no question concerning if Trump was responsible for overturning Roe. He was not. You have not taken a stand on that.
It is clear now.Blackvegetable » 23 Sep 2024, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ He clearly was and is taking credit for it.
My stand on that is crystal clear..
Not just ANY "justices"....the ones necessary to overturn Roe. It wasn't "coincidental"...it was a necessary qualification for consideration.*Huey » 23 Sep 2024, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ It is clear now.
All he did was appoint the Justices. He did not hear the case or offer a legal opinion.
If that is your opinion tell it to those who protested outside the homes of the Justices, made threats to the Justices, etc etc etc.Blackvegetable » 23 Sep 2024, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Not just ANY "justices"....the ones necessary to overturn Roe. It wasn't "coincidental"...it was a necessary qualification for consideration.
Those are facts, Tiny.*Huey » 23 Sep 2024, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑ If that is your opinion tell it to those who protested outside the homes of the Justices, made threats to the Justices, etc etc etc.
YawnBlackvegetable » 23 Sep 2024, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Those are facts, Tiny.
Grifty wouldn't know a SCOTUS nominee from a cusk. He was handed a list of names by his sponsors - who had spent decades packing the court to achieve one single result. Grifty did as he was told....and brags about it.
Now he's gotta carry that weight..
Stop yapping about "stands", Runny...
You shouldn't of went there. You demanded mine, although it was posted.