Liberal Forum

*Vegas » 26 Sep 2024, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2024, 12:17 pm

Yes

yes

and yes. 

       

I am curious. Can you provide the context in which "trial by combat" coexists with "peaceful"?

maineman » 26 Sep 2024, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2024, 12:22 pm

I am curious. Can you provide the context in which "trial by combat" coexists with "peaceful"?

He didn't use it in that context. Neither as peaceful nor by violence. It's not my job to dumb things down for you. I am not going to teach you literacy. Figure it out. 


If I said "nukes keep the world peaceful." Would you be upset? Nukes do not appear to be consistent with peace. Yet, there you have it. 

maineman » 26 Sep 2024, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2024, 12:20 pm

As I said before ... you are free to believe your totally unproven "hypothesis" all you want.  However, the fervency of your belief does not give it any more credibility.  Your continued belief in this totally unproven "hypothesis" does indeed harm our Republic and our Constitution.  For that, you will remain my sworn enemy. 

Your character standing your ground as typecast by rule of law doesn't defend your time adapting ancestrally here so far, jus protecting the character you became serving humanity misleading ancestries for thousands of years to date.

time to change your mind, or don't. The reality you die for is the eternal hell it created so many generation gaps ago.

*Vegas » 26 Sep 2024, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2024, 12:24 pm

He didn't use it in that context. Neither as peaceful nor by violence. It's not my job to dumb things down for you. I am not going to teach you literacy. Figure it out. 

If I said "nukes keep the world peaceful." Would you be upset? Nukes do not appear to be consistent with peace. Yet, there you have it.

"combat"  is a pretty inherently violent word.

just sayin'

and to be accurate, you should say that the threat of nuclear annihilation keeps the world peaceful. 
 

maineman » 26 Sep 2024, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2024, 12:32 pm

"combat"  is a pretty inherently violent word.

just sayin'

So are nukes.    

You read what you want to read. You interpret what you want to interpret. It's all clouded by your TDS. All of it. 

maineman » 26 Sep 2024, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2024, 12:32 pm

"combat"  is a pretty inherently violent word.

just sayin'

and to be accurate, you should say that the threat of nuclear annihilation keeps the world peaceful. 
 

Cow patties. Mutually Assured Destruction doesn't do anything to stop people choose denying why they exist in plain sight daily.

maineman » 26 Sep 2024, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2024, 10:28 am

I am.  I always have.  And I know down to the bottom of my soul that it ISN'T an orange clown who tried to overthrow our government in 2021.

 If I had been in charge of security at the Capitol on January 6th, machine gun emplacements would have mowed down insurrectionists the minute they first breached the security barriers

No sort of "Military Man" would be caught dead claiming that a mob of protesters armed with pocket knives, bear spray and flag poles was an attempt to "overthrow the US Government".
Real military men have too much self respect to make such ridiculous claims. 
Only some effeminately raised Stolen Valor Drama Queen like you would make such a ridiculous claim.
You look so incredibly stupid...and so totally **** gay.     
If you had gunned down all of the unarmed Protestors that were deliberately allowed to venture past the 3 foot high bicycle racks and unlocked doors, you would be no different than any of the worst dictators in Man's History.
 
 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 26 Sep 2024, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2024, 12:57 pm

No sort of "Military Man" would be caught dead claiming that a mob of protesters armed with pocket knives, bear spray and flag poles was an attempt to "overthrow the US Government".
Real military men have too much self respect to make such ridiculous claims. 
Only some effeminately raised Stolen Valor Drama Queen like you would make such a ridiculous claim.
You look so incredibly stupid...and so totally **** gay.     
If you had gunned down all of the unarmed Protestors that were deliberately allowed to venture past the 3 foot high bicycle racks and unlocked doors, you would be no different than any of the worst dictators in Man's History.

I'm RebelGator and I approve of this message.   

Blackvegetable » 26 Sep 2024, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2024, 11:02 am

Just do it, Snail Trail.

You have no idea where to start, do you...

Run panty dancer, RUN...

ROG62 » 25 Sep 2024, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

25 Sep 2024, 8:32 am

PENNSYLVANIA

Registered to a commercial address: 2,405-
Missing or wrong apt number:323,524-
Invalid address:346,505-
Used Post Office Physical Address:240-
Registration occurred on a fed holiday:315,517-
Moved, left no forwarding address:27,672-
Permanently moved out of state:262,488-
Permanently moved to a new county:169,083 (within Pennsylvania)
Total: 1,447,434

https://www.stopbogusballots.com/pennsylvania

lots of potential for fraud...

are the supervisors of elections in pa competent?

BuckNaked » 06 Oct 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2024, 9:36 am

are the supervisors of elections in pa competent?

They don't matter...this will go right up to the AG...
 

BuckNaked » 06 Oct 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2024, 9:36 am

are the supervisors of elections in pa competent?

Only if the fact that people die, move, make errors all the time translates into illegal votes.

Does it?

 

ROG62 » 06 Oct 2024, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2024, 10:00 am

They don't matter...this will go right up to the AG...

What is "this"?

Blackvegetable » 06 Oct 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2024, 10:15 am

What is "this"?

If any flagged ballots are used to vote (regardless of pahtee) CSE's attorneys will take it up with the respective state's AG...
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Oct 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2024, 10:14 am

Only if the fact that people die, move, make errors all the time translates into illegal votes.

Does it?

 

it explains how they get validated and counted to be used as needed to change actual outcome of an election without a trace of persons doing something illegal, just mismanagement of current events.

It is called plausible deniability and using it is planned obsolescence

Blackvegetable » 06 Oct 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2024, 10:14 am

Only if the fact that people die, move, make errors all the time translates into illegal votes.

Does it?

Do their job!

BuckNaked » 06 Oct 2024, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2024, 3:56 pm

Do their job!

Didn't you cast 2 votes for the guy who delegated the reading of his one page, dumbed down, DIB to his son in law....who lacked clearance?

Blackvegetable » 06 Oct 2024, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2024, 4:50 pm

Didn't you cast 2 votes for the guy who delegated the reading of his one page, dumbed down, DIB to his son in law....who lacked clearance?

Who?

ROG62 » 06 Oct 2024, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2024, 10:00 am

They don't matter...this will go right up to the AG...

it MAY go right up to the AG... if it is a nothing burger, it ain't going anywhere.

maineman » 06 Oct 2024, 7:35 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2024, 7:35 pm

it MAY go right up to the AG... if it is a nothing burger, it ain't going anywhere.

State voting laws require a valid address of residence...Walmarts, post offices, etc do not qualify as residences and have to be disqualified and thrown out...