Liberal Forum

The cucks are cucking....

to a broken dying Empire.

ITS GLORIOUS!!!!!

     

maineman » 06 Oct 2024, 7:35 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2024, 7:35 pm

it MAY go right up to the AG... if it is a nothing burger, it ain't going anywhere.

Making people mind isn't same thing as allowing ancestors to understand why they exist in natural time alive daily. Socially engineered outcomes aren't the same thing as outcomes balancing in the moment all the time each is uniquely occupying space here now since conceived by previous generation gaps.

Blackvegetable » 06 Oct 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2024, 10:14 am

Only if the fact that people die, move, make errors all the time translates into illegal votes.

Does it?

Who knows 

maineman » 26 Sep 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

26 Sep 2024, 11:13 am

My statement about GOTV is absolutely accurate.  We busted our asses to get our base to mail in their ballots and we were successful.  You lazy **** drove around in your **** pickup trucks waving Trump flags and forgot to vote!

The application of abductive reasoning & laws of probability to the facts indicate fraud in 2020, & Dem actions to enable fraud-prone schemes are clues & evidence.Had there been only 1 indicator the Dems wanted to cheat - for example, pushing ballot harvesting, that would have been somewhat suspicious, but may not have pushed the probability meter beyond 50%.But there were numerous clues & indicators: The completely unnecessary vote-by-mail scheme, refusal to purge rolls, ballot harvesting, suits attempting to prevent signature verification, Dem suits to prevent laws requiring proof of citizenship to register, & Dem states refusing to enact voter ID laws.Not exactly a list of ideas to ensure an honest election.Taken together, these Dem actions prior to the election screamed, "We are going to cheat!" The probability meter is pegged.That election results must be trusted is something completely missed by Dems. And rational citizens will not trust a system that enables the type of fraud-prone, ballot-box stuffing schemes the Dems support. A lack of trust is the real "threat to democracy."And, btw, for every such ballot cast a legitimate ballot is offset. That's the real voter suppression that occurred in the fraudulent 2020 election.

 

Majik » 07 Oct 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

07 Oct 2024, 9:49 am

The application of abductive reasoning & laws of probability to the facts indicate fraud in 2020, & Dem actions to enable fraud-prone schemes are clues & evidence.Had there been only 1 indicator the Dems wanted to cheat - for example, pushing ballot harvesting, that would have been somewhat suspicious, but may not have pushed the probability meter beyond 50%.But there were numerous clues & indicators: The completely unnecessary vote-by-mail scheme, refusal to purge rolls, ballot harvesting, suits attempting to prevent signature verification, Dem suits to prevent laws requiring proof of citizenship to register, & Dem states refusing to enact voter ID laws.Not exactly a list of ideas to ensure an honest election.Taken together, these Dem actions prior to the election screamed, "We are going to cheat!" The probability meter is pegged.That election results must be trusted is something completely missed by Dems. And rational citizens will not trust a system that enables the type of fraud-prone, ballot-box stuffing schemes the Dems support. A lack of trust is the real "threat to democracy."And, btw, for every such ballot cast a legitimate ballot is offset. That's the real voter suppression that occurred in the fraudulent 2020 election.

Majik » 07 Oct 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

07 Oct 2024, 9:49 am

The application of abductive reasoning & laws of probability to the facts indicate fraud in 2020, & Dem actions to enable fraud-prone schemes are clues & evidence.Had there been only 1 indicator the Dems wanted to cheat - for example, pushing ballot harvesting, that would have been somewhat suspicious, but may not have pushed the probability meter beyond 50%.But there were numerous clues & indicators: The completely unnecessary vote-by-mail scheme, refusal to purge rolls, ballot harvesting, suits attempting to prevent signature verification, Dem suits to prevent laws requiring proof of citizenship to register, & Dem states refusing to enact voter ID laws.Not exactly a list of ideas to ensure an honest election.Taken together, these Dem actions prior to the election screamed, "We are going to cheat!" The probability meter is pegged.That election results must be trusted is something completely missed by Dems. And rational citizens will not trust a system that enables the type of fraud-prone, ballot-box stuffing schemes the Dems support. A lack of trust is the real "threat to democracy."And, btw, for every such ballot cast a legitimate ballot is offset. That's the real voter suppression that occurred in the fraudulent 2020 election.

And yet, nearly four years later, all you have are theories.  

NOT ONE BIT OF EVIDENCE OF OUTCOME-DETERMINATE VOTER FRAUD.

I would further postulate that the thing that Democrats completely missed was the craven willingness of the MAGA right to continue to push the Big Lie without any evidence and, themselves, willingly create distrust in our elections as a prelude to an attempted insurrection and the destruction of American democracy with Project 2025.

ROG62 » 07 Oct 2024, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

07 Oct 2024, 10:40 am

That's what happens when you have to spend the night verifying mail-in ballots that, in multiple states, you couldn't even open until after the polls closed. Then, when verified, they get fed into the system as a batch.

Red Mirage - Blue Tsunami.  Hell.... even Trump's own team predicted it themselves:

"Although his multiple conspiracies began after election day in 2020, the defendant laid the groundwork for his crimes well before then. Leading into the election, the defendant's private and Campaign advisors, including [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #6] (then a private citizen) and [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #2] (the defendant's Campaign manager), informed him that it would be a close contest and that it was unlikely to be finalized on election day—in part because of the time needed to process large numbers of mail-in ballots prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic. They also told the defendant that the initial returns on election night might be misleading—that is, that he might take an early lead in the vote count that would diminish as mail-in ballots were counted because his own supporters favored in-person Voting, while supporters of his opponent, Joseph R. Biden, favored mail-in ballots."

Hopefully the supervisor of elections have their **** together and states are not violating their constitutions

Blackvegetable » 06 Oct 2024, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2024, 4:50 pm

Didn't you cast 2 votes for the guy who delegated the reading of his one page, dumbed down, DIB to his son in law....who lacked clearance?

DIB?

maineman » 07 Oct 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

07 Oct 2024, 11:15 am

That's what happens when you have to spend the night verifying mail-in ballots that, in multiple states, you couldn't even open until after the polls closed. Then, when verified, they get fed into the system as a batch.

Red Mirage - Blue Tsunami.  Hell.... even Trump's own team predicted it themselves:

"Although his multiple conspiracies began after election day in 2020, the defendant laid the groundwork for his crimes well before then. Leading into the election, the defendant's private and Campaign advisors, including [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #6] (then a private citizen) and [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #2] (the defendant's Campaign manager), informed him that it would be a close contest and that it was unlikely to be finalized on election day—in part because of the time needed to process large numbers of mail-in ballots prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic. They also told the defendant that the initial returns on election night might be misleading—that is, that he might take an early lead in the vote count that would diminish as mail-in ballots were counted because his own supporters favored in-person Voting, while supporters of his opponent, Joseph R. Biden, favored mail-in ballots."

maineman » 07 Oct 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

07 Oct 2024, 11:09 am

And yet, nearly four years later, all you have are theories.  

NOT ONE BIT OF EVIDENCE OF OUTCOME-DETERMINATE VOTER FRAUD.

Relative time theory your mind factualizes social engineering outcomes beyond evolving in plain sight because ancestries choose to follow leading alternate reality specialists life isn't self evident daily when living is a series parallel situation since rotation conceived to replace the 30 specific lifetimes that were your direct lineage to occupying space uniquely alive now.