Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
1.4 million bogus mail-in ballots in PA...
1.4 million bogus mail-in ballots in PA...
By ROG62
Yesterday 8:32 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Today 5:57 am
And you're traveling the country this week getting illegals to vote?JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Yesterday, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Rog…
The only illegal voting was perpetrated by a few republicans and they got caught
Today 6:26 am
If it's "real", it's measurable, Rog..ROG62 » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Real world living, brown... I guess being laid up in the home's got you sheltered, eh?
You're a moron.
That's real.
Today 6:32 am
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Yesterday, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑ ^^
Has Gaydar and obviously takes one to know one
^^suffering from a Nefarious induced butthurt....A Lefty calling people gay....an example of extreme homophobia, an emotional breakdown and a lack of creativity
Looks like you've fallen into the exact stereotype all Lefties fall under...triggered...butthurt that doesn't ever heal....examples of your inner hatred for anyone more intelligent than you....and to top it all off, "Brain-Lock"....when an emotional breakdown destroys the ability to think
Thanks for giving me all the credit...best case of ******* I've ever seen
here's your trophy...you've earned it
Today 7:05 am
nefarious101 » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ ^^suffering from a Nefarious induced butthurt....A Lefty calling people gay....an example of extreme homophobia, an emotional breakdown and a lack of creativity
Looks like you've fallen into the exact stereotype all Lefties fall under...triggered...butthurt that doesn't ever heal....examples of your inner hatred for anyone more intelligent than you....and to top it all off, "Brain-Lock"....when an emotional breakdown destroys the ability to think
Thanks for giving me all the credit...best case of ******* I've ever seen
here's your trophy...you've earned it
Today 8:04 am
It is measurable, ****...Blackvegetable » Today, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑ If it's "real", it's measurable, Rog..
You're a moron.
That's real.
since joe got in...
20-30% inflation
gas prices up 50 to 150% depending on date
interest rates 7%
cc debt over 1 trillion
rent skyrocketing
10 million illegals got in draining the printed money bank
he's printing money like throwing candy at a parade...
anything else, brown?
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
Today 8:14 am
ROG62 » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It is measurable, ****...
since joe got in...
20-30% inflation
gas prices up 50 to 150% depending on date
interest rates 7%
cc debt over 1 trillion
rent skyrocketing
10 million illegals got in draining the printed money bank
he's printing money like throwing candy at a parade...
anything else, brown?
Post the current inflation rate (annualized).20-30% inflation
gas prices up 50 to 150% depending on date
Post the current avg retail price of gasoline.
Just the numbers..
Today 8:19 am
Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Post the current inflation rate (annualized).
Post the current avg retail price of gasoline.
Just the numbers..
hey you **** retarded nigga... this is about ballot cheating
Today 8:20 am
*Vegas » Yesterday, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ And @Blackvegetable will still say that 2020 wasn't rigged...because CNN said so.
The level of stupid is unparalleled.
I say it wasn't rigged because there is no evidence that proves it was.
And the OP is not about mail in ballots, but rather ballot applications.
Today 8:29 am
Can you just imagine? Worse than Buchanan and STILL better than the pedophile and the hyena twat.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ WORSE....THAN....BUCHANAN.
TWICE.
He lost because he sucks.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Today 8:30 am
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Post the current inflation rate (annualized).
Post the current avg retail price of gasoline.
Just the numbers..
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Today 8:35 am
Mail fraud is a federal crime. The two main elements of mail fraud are: the defendant (1) had a scheme or plan to defraud someone and (2) used the "mail system" (or planned to) as a way to carry out the scheme. The mail system includes the U.S. postal service, as well as commercial interstate delivery services like UPS and FedEx.
In a mail fraud prosecution, the government need not prove that the scheme actually injured victims, or was even carried out completely. It's not even necessary that the victim of the scheme had knowledge of its existence. The scheme and intent to defraud are enough.
It's not necessary that mailing be an essential part of the scheme (it can be an incidental piece of it). The government needn't prove that the defendant actually deposited anything in the mail or with the delivery service; it's enough to prove that mailing or depositing the item at a collection point was an eventual part of the plan. The prosecutor can even prove "mailing" by pointing to an office's regular mailing procedures.
——————————————
Two common defenses to mail fraud are the statute of limitations and good faith defense.Statute of limitations.
Statutes of limitations impose time limits on prosecutors to file criminal charges. Most mail fraud charges must be brought within five years of the offense. If the offense affects a financial institution, federal prosecutors have 10 years to bring the case.
Good faith defense. A defendant might also argue that he or she believed in good faith that the allegedly false representations were true when made. This defense challenges the element of fraudulent intent.
https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/c ... -fraud.htm
In a mail fraud prosecution, the government need not prove that the scheme actually injured victims, or was even carried out completely. It's not even necessary that the victim of the scheme had knowledge of its existence. The scheme and intent to defraud are enough.
It's not necessary that mailing be an essential part of the scheme (it can be an incidental piece of it). The government needn't prove that the defendant actually deposited anything in the mail or with the delivery service; it's enough to prove that mailing or depositing the item at a collection point was an eventual part of the plan. The prosecutor can even prove "mailing" by pointing to an office's regular mailing procedures.
——————————————
Two common defenses to mail fraud are the statute of limitations and good faith defense.Statute of limitations.
Statutes of limitations impose time limits on prosecutors to file criminal charges. Most mail fraud charges must be brought within five years of the offense. If the offense affects a financial institution, federal prosecutors have 10 years to bring the case.
Good faith defense. A defendant might also argue that he or she believed in good faith that the allegedly false representations were true when made. This defense challenges the element of fraudulent intent.
https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/c ... -fraud.htm
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
Today 9:02 am
Annualized doesn't mean ****...the impact comes from the aggregate...Blackvegetable » 50 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Post the current inflation rate (annualized).
Post the current avg retail price of gasoline.
Just the numbers..
gas is still up 50%...
nod...
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
Today 9:02 am
Cannonpointer » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
Today 9:04 am
NEVER, EVER, **** PRESUME, JuCo!ROG62 » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Annualized doesn't mean ****...the impact comes from the aggregate...
gas is still up 50%...
nod...
Today 9:22 am
OUCH! that's definitely gonna leave a mark...Cannonpointer » 56 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Can you just imagine? Worse than Buchanan and STILL better than the pedophile and the hyena twat.
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
Today 9:25 am
**** off, brown...now run...
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
Today 9:33 am
This is a logical fallacy. The absence of proof does not conclude to a negation of the hypothesis.maineman » Today, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑ I say it wasn't rigged because there is no evidence that proves it was.
For example, at this time, we have no concrete proof that life exists outside of Earth. That doesn't mean that life doesn't exist outside of Earth. All it means is that we haven't found evidence of it...yet. There could be some small bacteria somewhere in some distant galaxy.
Today 9:51 am
run...
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
Today 10:00 am
*Vegas » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ This is a logical fallacy. The absence of proof does not conclude to a negation of the hypothesis.
For example, at this time, we have no concrete proof that life exists outside of Earth. That doesn't mean that life doesn't exist outside of Earth. All it means is that we haven't found evidence of it...yet. There could be some small bacteria somewhere in some distant galaxy.
Continue to claim it was rigged all you like. All you are doing is sowing doubt and creating cracks in the foundation of our marvelous democracy. You are a partisan hack and a traitor as far as I am concerned.
Today 10:02 am
maineman » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Continue to claim it was rigged all you like. All you are doing is sowing doubt and creating cracks in the foundation of our marvelous democracy. You are a partisan hack and a traitor as far as I am concerned.
A true soldier of the democrat party. ^^^ How about you think about what is best for America instead of thinking about what is best for the democrat party? Who is online
In total there are 2061 users online :: 24 registered, 16 bots, and 2021 guests
Registered users: Fuelman, 31st Arrival, sooted up Cyndi, PoliticalPopUp, ROG62, *Vegas, Cannonpointer, Bidencrimefamily, LowIQTrash, jerra b, golfboy, maineman, EDC4ALL!, BooRadley, JohnEdgarSlowHorses, Sumela, righteous, Deezer Shoove, dildo_swaggins, Mrkelly, Blackvegetable, GHETTO BLASTER, *Beekeeper, Buck Naked
Bots: ADmantX, okhttp, GrapeshotCrawler, proximic, DuckDuckBot, Mediapartners-Google, app.hypefactors.com, Feedfetcher-Google, Applebot, YandexBot, curl/7, semantic-visions.com, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, linkfluence.com, bingbot