The situation has become appalling’: fake scientific papers push research credibility to crisis point

By *Vegas
29 Sep 2024 11:27 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2
User avatar
Beekeeper
30 Sep 2024 8:43 am
User avatar
      
10,500 posts
DeezerShoove » 29 Sep 2024, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ I gave up shaming assholes here for claiming "proof" when they cited peer reviewed papers and such.
That was actually a few years ago.
Peer reviews were dubious then and, as you say, have become basically useless now.

Morons can be impressed by some "Who will fact check the fact-checkers?" article written recently.
That's the trailer trash level of this issue.

Peer reviewing process went to **** under the radar long ago.
I have seen it close up myself just like you.

Peer review Definition-

"Let me give you a glowing review so I can help you get MORE FUNDING from government to produce more shambolic **** papers for you to use to keep the cycle going!! and you can do the same for me!!"


Don't doubt me here.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
User avatar
PhiloBeddo
30 Sep 2024 9:47 am
User avatar
     
3,742 posts
Scientists will get you any result you want for the right amount of money. Most things are ****.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
30 Sep 2024 11:20 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
47,024 posts
Majik » 30 Sep 2024, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑ The rise and fall of peer review

Why the greatest scientific experiment in history failed, and why that's a great thing 

https://www.experimental-history.com/p/ ... eer-review

It's an excellent critique ......
WOWZA!

That was some through the looking glass ****. I went down rabbit hole after rabbit hole!
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Majik
30 Sep 2024 11:44 am
User avatar
      
6,222 posts
Cannonpointer » 30 Sep 2024, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ WOWZA!

That was some through the looking glass ****. I went down rabbit hole after rabbit hole!
Did you learn anything that you didn't already know or suspect ?
Because that was my intention for posting it .....in the first place .....

 
User avatar
Cannonpointer
30 Sep 2024 4:04 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
47,024 posts
Majik » 30 Sep 2024, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ Did you learn anything that you didn't already know or suspect ?
Because that was my intention for posting it .....in the first place .....
Hell yeah - that's why I went down rabbit holes. I didn't really know the origins of peer review, and I had no idea there were others questioning its usefulness and validity. I CERTAINLY did not know that a peer reviewed takedown of peer review had been proffered.
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
LowIQTrash
30 Sep 2024 5:55 pm
User avatar
     
3,398 posts
Cannonpointer » 30 Sep 2024, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Hell yeah - that's why I went down rabbit holes. I didn't really know the origins of peer review, and I had no idea there were others questioning its usefulness and validity. I CERTAINLY did not know that a peer reviewed takedown of peer review had been proffered.

My parsimony is too evident in the deluge of greenies you’ve been flooded with…damn that Majik!!
User avatar
LowIQTrash
30 Sep 2024 5:57 pm
User avatar
     
3,398 posts
Cannonpointer » 29 Sep 2024, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ There has only been one small change. In the past, papers were reviewed for methodology and accuracy.

Now they are reviewed for correctness of outcome.
Phelix _*** INSISTED that HIS syunce was always accurate and “carefully vetted.” 

:?  
1 2

Who is online

In total there are 6643 users online :: 6 registered, 16 bots, and 6621 guests
Bots: SpiderLing, linkfluence.com, LCC, Not, Bolt, TTD-Content, ADmantX, proximic, Mediatoolkitbot, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, curl/7
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search