^^COWARD ******
*Beekeeper » 02 Oct 2024, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑ Vance drug Tampon Timmy's BLOODY *** all over the debate stage last night in 2 hours of MASSIVE *** KICKING!!
It was masterful as it gets.
No, YOU ARE
?????
Yep
Back on the we mantra thing.
From your link:JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 02 Oct 2024, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑ Another Conservative Fabricated HOAX.
MORANS WILL BE MORANS
SLIT YOUR WRISTS AND BLEED OUT![]()
What does this Minnesota law require of schools?
The law, which took effect Jan. 1, requires schools to provide access to menstrual products such as pads, tampons or other similar period products, "in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district."
As adopted, the law does not distinguish by sex or gender. It says the products "must be available to all menstruating students."This means transgender boys and nonbinary students — who might menstruate and are permitted to use boys’ restrooms — must also have access to the menstrual products.
That does not mean menstrual products must be stocked in boys’ restrooms, legal experts told PolitiFact.
"As written the law does not require products to be put in men’s restrooms," said Lacey Gero, director of government relations at the Alliance for Period Supplies, a nonprofit organization.
"The law leaves it up to the local school districts to create a plan for providing products in restrooms, but does not specify which restrooms."
Some states with similar laws specify that period products should be provided only in girls’ restrooms, said Suzanne Herman, a lawyer and legal director at Period Law, a legal group that advocates making menstrual products free. Minnesota does not.
"It’s more inclusive than other laws, but it certainly doesn’t mandate that they be in all boys’ restrooms," Herman said of Minnesota’s law.
https://www.wral.com/story/fact-check-d ... /21584434/
https://youtu.be/1nxFLNNV4PU
psst... no tampons in the boys bathroomCedar » 02 Oct 2024, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ From your link:
“2 in 5 women struggled to purchase period supplies within the past year due to lack of income.”
Sounds like a ringing endorsement of the current Harris/Biden administration.
**chuckle**
Tampon Tim would disagree, the law is quite clear.
you can't read
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 02 Oct 2024, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑ Another Conservative Fabricated HOAX.
MORANS WILL BE MORANS
SLIT YOUR WRISTS AND BLEED OUT![]()
What does this Minnesota law require of schools?
The law, which took effect Jan. 1, requires schools to provide access to menstrual products such as pads, tampons or other similar period products, "in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district."
As adopted, the law does not distinguish by sex or gender. It says the products "must be available to all menstruating students."This means transgender boys and nonbinary students — who might menstruate and are permitted to use boys’ restrooms — must also have access to the menstrual products.
That does not mean menstrual products must be stocked in boys’ restrooms, legal experts told PolitiFact.
"As written the law does not require products to be put in men’s restrooms," said Lacey Gero, director of government relations at the Alliance for Period Supplies, a nonprofit organization.
"The law leaves it up to the local school districts to create a plan for providing products in restrooms, but does not specify which restrooms."
Some states with similar laws specify that period products should be provided only in girls’ restrooms, said Suzanne Herman, a lawyer and legal director at Period Law, a legal group that advocates making menstrual products free. Minnesota does not.
"It’s more inclusive than other laws, but it certainly doesn’t mandate that they be in all boys’ restrooms," Herman said of Minnesota’s law.
https://www.wral.com/story/fact-check-d ... /21584434/
https://youtu.be/1nxFLNNV4PU



Nope.
Quote the actual bill.
You want ATF agents to inspect 283 million cars??