Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Jack Smith's bombshell filing
Jack Smith's bombshell filing
By maineman
2 Oct 2024 4:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
3 Oct 2024 3:25 pm
No...you are, **** idiot.*Beekeeper » 03 Oct 2024, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑ WHO's the **** IDIOT???
The election, and the subsequent recount, are notable for giving rise to the first occurrence of "dueling" electoral slates in American history since the 1887 enactment of the Electoral Count Act.[6] During the 2000 United States presidential election recount in Florida,
[...]
Litigation was still ongoing on December 13, the safe harbor deadline for certification under the Electoral Count Act. As only the Republican slate had so far been certified by the state's governor, its votes would be the only ones eligible for safe harbor status. Republicans argued that the litigation should end, since even if the recount should result in a Kennedy victory, under the rules of the Electoral Count Act Congress was required to presume that the Republican electors were the validly appointed electors for Hawaii.[12]
However, the following day, the presiding circuit court judge Ronald B. Jamieson ordered a partial recount to begin. A limited retabulation showed Nixon's margin over Kennedy decreasing, and as more ballots were opened and retabulated on subsequent days, Nixon's lead shrank and eventually disappeared. By December 18, the partial recount showed Kennedy leading Nixon in the state by 55 votes.[12]
The recount was thus still ongoing on December 19, the day specified in U.S. law for the casting of votes by the members of the electoral college. As a consequence, both the officially certified Republican slate of electors (Gavien A. Bush, J. Howard Worrall, and O. P. Soares) and an "unofficial" Democratic slate of electors (Jennie K. Wilson, William H. Heen, and Delbert E. Metzger) convened in the ʻIolani Palace and cast competing electoral votes for Nixon and Kennedy just one minute apart.[10][15] Certificates for both slates' electoral votes were sent to Franklin G. Floete, the Administrator of General Services.[11]
I am aware of Hawaii, but it doesn't apply.
3 Oct 2024 3:27 pm
That sounds quite dramatic. I imagine we will survive and 4 years of Kamala may be just what the populace really needs to see before taking a hard right turn.Cedar » 03 Oct 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ If Kamala wins, this country will be finished. The boot of the dictator will be on everyone’s throat equally.
Your opinion may differ.
Trump's luck may run out!
3 Oct 2024 3:27 pm
You're a rube because you wanna be.
"When our research and campaign legal team can't back up any of the claims made by our Elite Strike Force Legal Team, you can see why we're 0-32 on our cases," the campaign adviser allegedly wrote.
"I'll obviously hustle to help on all fronts, but it's tough to own any of this when it's all just conspiracy s--- beamed down from the mothership."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/5-key- ... ase-filing
3 Oct 2024 3:30 pm
I pray I’m wrong, I fear I’m not.Fuelman » 03 Oct 2024, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ That sounds quite dramatic. I imagine we will survive and 4 years of Kamala may be just what the populace really needs to see before taking a hard right turn.
Trump's luck may run out!
3 Oct 2024 3:34 pm
“The thing is, you see what you wanna see - and you hear what you wanna hear. You dig?”Blackvegetable » 03 Oct 2024, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a rube because you wanna be.
"When our research and campaign legal team can't back up any of the claims made by our Elite Strike Force Legal Team, you can see why we're 0-32 on our cases," the campaign adviser allegedly wrote.
"I'll obviously hustle to help on all fronts, but it's tough to own any of this when it's all just conspiracy s--- beamed down from the mothership."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/5-key- ... ase-filing
3 Oct 2024 3:42 pm
It’s a filing in the criminal case of United States of America v Donald Trump. The filing is a violation of Trumps 5th and 6th amendment rights under the US constitution.maineman » 03 Oct 2024, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑ where does it need to be "admitted"?
This was just a filing that laid out what behavior of Donald Trump the prosecutor felt was not covered by the SCOTUS presidential immunity for official acts.
3 Oct 2024 3:46 pm
I disagree. I have a zoom call with my AAG daughter this evening to discuss this. We'll see what she has to say.Cedar » 03 Oct 2024, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ It’s a filing in the criminal case of United States of America v Donald Trump. The filing is a violation of Trumps 5th and 6th amendment rights under the US constitution.
3 Oct 2024 3:49 pm
I hope you’re prepared for her to agree with me unless she’s another progressive hack. Let me know how it goes.maineman » 03 Oct 2024, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I disagree. I have a zoom call with my AAG daughter this evening to discuss this. We'll see what she has to say.
3 Oct 2024 3:57 pm
why don't you lay out for me how you think that Smith's filing violates Trump's 5th and 6th Amendment rights?Cedar » 03 Oct 2024, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑ I hope you’re prepared for her to agree with me unless she’s another progressive hack. Let me know how it goes.
3 Oct 2024 4:05 pm
maineman » 03 Oct 2024, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑ where does it need to be "admitted"?
This was just a filing that laid out what behavior of Donald Trump the prosecutor felt was not covered by the SCOTUS presidential immunity for official acts.
It VIOLATED Trump's CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS to a FAIR TRIAL with an IMPARTIAL JURY!! This will ALL be appealed and the SCOTUS will once AGAIN educate you on how the CONSTITUTION PROTECTS RIGHTS and dismisses this entire **** of a "trial".
Sucks you love that so much as long as it "gets Trump"!! To HELL with that Constitution in your **** PIG **** FOR A PEA BRAIN!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
3 Oct 2024 4:13 pm
Cedar » 03 Oct 2024, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑ I hope you’re prepared for her to agree with me unless she’s another progressive hack. Let me know how it goes.
and I find it sort of disconcerting that you would opine that anyone who doesn't share YOUR view is a "progressive hack".
actually, the more I think about it, the more I just don't want to engage with you on this topic going forward.
asshole.
3 Oct 2024 4:14 pm
Blackvegetable » 03 Oct 2024, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ No...you are, **** idiot.
I am aware of Hawaii, but it doesn't apply.
You're a **** idiot. Not just an "idiot" but one MASSIVELY MORONIC **** IDIOT!!
It applies, DICKWEED!! Show us your LAW DEGREE and then we can talk.
!!MANY Constitutional attorneys say it APPLIES and will be shown .as much. BTW, the guilty plea was for a signature on a "fake" document, not for the alternate slate of electors. The CLAIM was far different than you are trying to say it was. PERHAPS you should go back to 3rd grade and learn some READING COMPREHENSION skills. If you have enough BRAINS that is.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
3 Oct 2024 4:17 pm
Your concession is duly noted.maineman » 03 Oct 2024, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑ and I find it sort of disconcerting that you would opine that anyone who doesn't share YOUR view is a "progressive hack".
actually, the more I think about it, the more I just don't want to engage with you on this topic going forward.
asshole.
3 Oct 2024 4:19 pm
which closet might that be?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
3 Oct 2024 4:21 pm
^^^ being coy? how droll!
3 Oct 2024 4:22 pm
I concede nothing. Nothing in Smith's filing violates Trump's 5th and 6th Amendment rights.
3 Oct 2024 4:23 pm
not at all...honest question...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
3 Oct 2024 4:32 pm
5th amendment, the right to due processmaineman » 03 Oct 2024, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑ why don't you lay out for me how you think that Smith's filing violates Trump's 5th and 6th Amendment rights?
=15px5th amendment, the right to due process
6th amendment, right to an impartial jury and the right to confront his accusers. It's been released to the public tainting any prospective jurors with inadmissible evidence.
3 Oct 2024 4:38 pm
Unfortunately not before the election, this whole charade is nothing more than election interference.*Beekeeper » 03 Oct 2024, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑ This will ALL be appealed and the SCOTUS will once AGAIN educate you on how the CONSTITUTION PROTECTS RIGHTS and dismisses this entire **** of a "trial".
3 Oct 2024 4:40 pm
maineman » 03 Oct 2024, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ I concede nothing. Nothing in Smith's filing violates Trump's 5th and 6th Amendment rights.
SURE it does!! When he lays out his ENTIRE CASE in a FILING, then ANYONE that is a potential juror is going to be able to READ IT!! AND it was made PUBLIC, you **** DOPE!!
And that means, they have a PREDETERMINED VERDICT before any trial is held!!
HOW **** STUPID ARE YOU, DICKBREATH??? Or are you back to daughter diddling again??
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
Who is online
In total there are 3361 users online :: 12 registered, 14 bots, and 3335 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Buck Naked, ROG62, Beekeeper, jerra b, jefftec, SouthernFried, nefarious101, sole, ….., Huey
Bots: Mediatoolkitbot, SpiderLing, NING, DuckDuckGo, CriteoBot, proximic, curl/7, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, DuckDuckBot, bingbot, Googlebot, Applebot