Liberal Forum

maineman » 02 Oct 2024, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2024, 8:46 pm

she ain't a felon.  a felon whose scrotum is in your mouth, *** hole

Swing . . . and a miss.

I kept it strictly based on her actions.
Actions that you are, as expected, going to forgive.
Actions you antiTrumpers claim is one of the biggest single things about him you hate.

She wrote and published lies. Even put up pictures trying to back up impossible claims.
So, your defense is a 7th graders taunt?   

And you want to be our forum expert on some douche bag's whining legalize?
It's been overnight since you said you'd read it. Did you?   

RebelGator » 02 Oct 2024, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2024, 6:44 pm

So what?

That was my first thought too.. I guess it means they finally got him now..

 


 

But wait... there's more:

5. Pennsylvania
‘Two days after the election, on November 6, the defendant called [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #46] the Chairman of the Pennsylvania Republican Party—the entity responsible for supporting Republican candidates in the commonwealth at the federal, state, and local level. [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #46] had a prior relationship with the defendant, including having represented him in litigation in Pennsylvania after the 2016 presidential election. The defendant asked [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #46] how, without fraud, he had gone from winning Pennsylvania on election day to trailing in the days afterward. Consistent with what Campaign staff already had told the defendant, [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #46] confirmed that it was not fraud: it was that there were roughly 1,750,000 mail-in ballots still being counted in Pennsylvania, which were expected to be eighty percent for Biden. Over the following two months, the defendant spread false claims of fraud in Pennsylvania anyway.  
 

but wait...there's more!

Two days later, on November 19, [REDACTED NAME OF CO-CONSPIRATOR #1], [REDACTED NAME OF CO-CONSPIRATOR #3], [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #46] and others held a press conference at the RNC headquarters, on behalf of the defendant and his Campaign. During it, [REDACTED NAME OF CO-CONSPIRATOR #3] made false and factually impossible claims regarding [REDACTED NAME OF COMPANY #3] and the integrity of the country’s election infrastructure. ”'* That night, Fox News television personality [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #51] stated on air that because of [REDACTED NAME OF CO-CONSPIRATOR #3] incendiary comments about voting machines, he had invited her on his television program. He further stated, “But she never sent us any evidence, despite a lot of requests, polite requests. Not a page. When we kept pressing. she got angry and told us to stop contacting her. When we checked with others around the Trump Campaign, people in positions of authority, they told us [REDACTED NAME OF CO-CONSPIRATOR #3] has never given them any evidence either ... she never demonstrated that a single actual vote was moved illegitimately by software from one candidate to another. Not one.”  
 

maineman » 02 Oct 2024, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2024, 4:42 pm

I am going to spend the evening reading the  entire 165 pages, but an interesting tidbit is this from page 142: 

"Upon receiving a phone call alerting him that Pence had been taken to a secure location,[REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #15] rushed to the dining room to inform the defendant in hopes that the defendant would take action to ensure Pence’s safety. Instead,after  [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #15] delivered the news, the defendant looked at him and said only, “So what?""

CRETINS UNITE   

https://i.postimg.cc/PfvsSb1S/well-waiting.gif
 

maineman » 03 Oct 2024, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

03 Oct 2024, 8:06 am

But wait... there's more:

5. Pennsylvania
‘Two days after the election, on November 6, the defendant called [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #46] the Chairman of the Pennsylvania Republican Party—the entity responsible for supporting Republican candidates in the commonwealth at the federal, state, and local level. [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #46] had a prior relationship with the defendant, including having represented him in litigation in Pennsylvania after the 2016 presidential election. The defendant asked [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #46] how, without fraud, he had gone from winning Pennsylvania on election day to trailing in the days afterward. Consistent with what Campaign staff already had told the defendant, [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #46] confirmed that it was not fraud: it was that there were roughly 1,750,000 mail-in ballots still being counted in Pennsylvania, which were expected to be eighty percent for Biden. Over the following two months, the defendant spread false claims of fraud in Pennsylvania anyway.

Reminds me of Billy May       

https://i.postimg.cc/bNPC11gD/billy-mad ... t-wait.gif
 

maineman » 02 Oct 2024, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2024, 4:42 pm

I am going to spend the evening reading the  entire 165 pages, but an interesting tidbit is this from page 142: 

"Upon receiving a phone call alerting him that Pence had been taken to a secure location,[REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #15] rushed to the dining room to inform the defendant in hopes that the defendant would take action to ensure Pence’s safety. Instead,after  [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #15] delivered the news, the defendant looked at him and said only, “So what?""

ROFLMAO!!!

And you think you "got him now"??? What CRIME does this state happened???

Oh wait!! A 165 page FILING that FULLY takes away Trump's CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL BY AN IMPARTIAL JURY!!

NO conviction will ever happen as NO TRIAL is going to be materializing, Capt, DICKSUCK!!

You are a nothing more than another LWNJ **** TOOL for the IDIOT CLASS!!

D. The Defendant Organized and Caused His Electors to Submit Fraudulent Certificates Creating the False Appearance That States
Submitted Competing Electoral Slates

"By late November 2020, every effort—both legitimate and illegitimate—that the defendant had made to challenge the results of the election had been unsuccessful. The defendant, his  Campaign, and their allies had lost or withdrawn one election lawsuit after another in the seven targeted states. And the defendant and co-conspirators' efforts to overturn the legitimate vote count through a pressure campaign on state officials, and through false claims made directly to state legislators in formal or pseudo-hearings, continued to fail. So in early December, the defendant and his co-conspirators developed a new plan regarding the targeted states that the defendant had lost (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin): to organize the people who would have served as the defendant's electors had he won the popular vote, and cause them to sign and send to Pence, as President of the Senate, certifications in which they falsely represented themselves as legitimate electors who had cast electoral votes for the defendant. Ultimately, the defendant and his co-conspirators would use these fraudulent electoral votes, mere pieces of paper without the lawful imprimatur of a state executive to falsely claim that in his ministerial role presiding over the January 6 certification, Pence had the authority to choose the fraudulent slates over the legitimate ones, or to send the purportedly "dueling" slates to the state legislatures for consideration anew."

What a **** slime ball!
 

RebelGator » 02 Oct 2024, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2024, 6:43 pm

OK, what's the main reason Kameltoe will?

She won't get my vote either.

Trump will get crushed by 11 to 13 points in Colorado.

My normally conservative vote doesn't mean squat here in Colorado, or in Oregon the years before, or in California the years before that.

On December 28, [CO-CONSPIRATOR #2] [CO-CONSPIRATOR #5] and [CO-CONSPIRATOR #6] exchanged text messages in which[CO-CONSPIRATOR #2] expressed concern that Gohmert v. Pence—a lawsuit filed the day before that asserted that Pence had discretion to choose electoral votes during the certification proceeding—would prompt a federal court to publicly reject, and thus preclude, the plan that the conspirators were advancing in private. Thereafter, at 11:00 a.m. on January 1 , the defendant called Pence to berate him because he had learned that Pence had filed a brief opposing the relief sought in Gohmert. When Pence explained, as he had before, that he did not believethat he had the power under the Constitution to decide which votes to accept, the defendant told him that “hundreds of thousands” of people “are gonna hate your guts” and “people are gonna think you're stupid,” and berated him pointedly, “You're too honest."


How can someone be TOO honest?  

At 11:15 a.m., shortly before traveling to the Ellipse to speak to his supporters, the defendant called Pence and made one last attempt to induce him to act unlawfully in the upcoming session. When Pence again refused, and told the defendant that he intended to make a statement to Congress before the certification proceeding confirming that he lacked the authority to do what the defendant wanted, the defendant was incensed. He decided to re-insert into his Campaign speech at the Ellipse remarks targeting Pence for his refusal to misuse his role in the certification. And the defendant set into motion the last plan in furtherance of his conspiracies: if Pence would not do as he asked, the defendant needed to find another way to prevent the certification of Biden as president. So on January 6, the defendant sent to the Capitol a crowd of angry supporters, whom the defendant had called to the city and inundated with false claims of outcome-determinative election fraud, to induce Pence not to certify the legitimate electoral votes and to obstruct the certification.
 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 03 Oct 2024, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

03 Oct 2024, 8:33 am

Reminds me of Billy May       

https://i.postimg.cc/bNPC11gD/billy-mad ... t-wait.gif

He was certainly my inspiration for that!
 

Jack Smith was appointed illegally, he will be arrested once Trump is elected

maineman » 02 Oct 2024, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2024, 4:42 pm

I am going to spend the evening reading the  entire 165 pages, but an interesting tidbit is this from page 142: 

"Upon receiving a phone call alerting him that Pence had been taken to a secure location,[REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #15] rushed to the dining room to inform the defendant in hopes that the defendant would take action to ensure Pence’s safety. Instead,after  [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #15] delivered the news, the defendant looked at him and said only, “So what?""

you wouldn't understand a word you are reading, neither would your whore daughter

RebelGator » 02 Oct 2024, 6:59 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2024, 6:59 pm

Did someone help you with that thread title?
Did you convulse or crap your pants remembering that insurrection where thousands were killed? You continue to make me lower my respect for our military....if your hysterical, melodramatic, and drama queen *** was an officer on a ship of war,  I wonder about the consequences of depending on your kind for our national security.

RG..there is no way that MM the hyperbolic, panic stricken   Drama Queen / ****** Bitch was ever in charge of a battle ship.

The overall impact of the defendant's speech - particularly in light of months of statements and Tweets falsely claiming election fraud and following on the heels of [CO-CONSPIRATOR #1 ] and [CO-CONSPIRATOR #2] speeches was to fuel the crowd's anger. For instance, when the defendant told his supporters
that “[w]e will not let them silence your voices. We're not going to let it happen," the crowd chanted, "Fight for Trump," in response. When the defendant soon after told supporters that "we're going to walk down to the Capitol," that they would “never take back our country with weakness," and that they had "to show strength and [had] to be strong," members of the crowd shouted, "Invade the Capitol building!” and, “Take the Capitol!" Thousands of the defendant's supporters obeyed his directive and marched to the Capitol, where the certification proceeding began around 1:00 p.m.

You MAGA morons should be so proud, eh?  


 

nefarious101 » 02 Oct 2024, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2024, 5:04 pm

here we go again....bombshell bombshell bombshell

russia russia russia

kavanaugh kavanaugh kavanaugh

and now Jan. 6th Jan. 6th Jan. 6th

 

Yell at it, Naffy...it will go away..

Blackvegetable » 03 Oct 2024, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

03 Oct 2024, 9:37 am

Yell at it, Naffy...it will go away..

Veghead's idea of level 2+

I'll save us time since we both know what your predictable and redundant *** will say next. 

Challenge.

1. Same old lie. 

DeezerShoove » 02 Oct 2024, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2024, 7:55 pm

I say "so what" to the entire over-produced, anti-climatic theater bomb.

Have fun becoming the forum expert on an un-authorized appointee's tripe. 

Why bother sharing that ****, Coozie?

*Vegas » 03 Oct 2024, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

03 Oct 2024, 9:39 am

Veghead's idea of level 2+

I'll save us time since we both know what your predictable and redundant *** will say next. 

Challenge.

1. Same old lie.

I challenge you to prove that you're not a moron.