You don't read your own ****.*Vegas » 03 Oct 2024, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ This is why you frequently quote other people with no thoughts of your own:
I will not entertain your stalking.
You often have to repeat yourself to narcissists because their behavior is designed to deflect, manipulate, and maintain control in interactions, making it difficult for them to truly listen or acknowledge what others are saying.
1. Selective Listening
Narcissists often engage in selective listening, focusing only on information that supports their ego or benefits them in some way. If what you are saying doesn't align with their self-interest or worldview, they may simply ignore or dismiss it. This selective attention forces you to repeat yourself in an attempt to make them understand or respond appropriately.
2. Deflection and DistractionNarcissists frequently use deflection as a way to avoid responsibility or uncomfortable conversations. If you’re trying to address a concern or hold them accountable for something, they might change the subject, blame someone else, or focus on irrelevant details to avoid dealing with the issue at hand. This deflection makes it necessary to repeatedly bring the conversation back to your point, creating a frustrating cycle.
3. Control and DominanceFor narcissists, conversations are often about maintaining control and dominance rather than having meaningful exchanges. They may ignore or dismiss your points because acknowledging them would undermine their perceived authority or control over the situation. By making you repeat yourself, they maintain control of the interaction and keep you on the defensive.
That's your rule dickhead, well one of them..Blackvegetable » 03 Oct 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ C'mon, Dicksucker......you know your rule....
No fun...ever.......

DeezerShoove » 03 Oct 2024, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ Hey, you stalk me.
That shovel is all yours.
Keep claiming I said something I did not.
Reminding me how **** dumb you are isn't necessary but I appreciate that total morons repeat a lot.
Normals have to get drunk to be that way...
:rofl:Keep claiming I said something I did not
Own your cowardice, Brinker...Jantje_Smit » 03 Oct 2024, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ That's your rule dickhead, well one of them..
No answers.. ever..
![]()
So cretin, are you here to complete the circlejerk?JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 03 Oct 2024, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ CRETINS UNITE![]()
https://i.postimg.cc/PfvsSb1S/well-waiting.gif
GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Oct 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ RG..there is no way that MM the hyperbolic, panic stricken Drama Queen / ****** Bitch was ever in charge of a battle ship.
Rog,
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 03 Oct 2024, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑ Rog,
you jelly.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
your dick hasn't worked in 20 years![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thanks for your concession....JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 03 Oct 2024, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑ Rog,
you jelly.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
your dick hasn't worked in 20 years![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Zeets2 » 03 Oct 2024, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ YOU MEAN TRUMP ACTUALLY SAID, "SO WHAT"?!?!!
OH, THE HUMANITY!!!
Since you're SO determined to deny the FACTS of fraud and election interference, tell us all how it wasn't really election interference when Biden hired 51 "former intelligence agents" to PURPOSELY LIE ABOUT THE HUNTER LAPTOP, when it was in the hands of the FBI for over a year and PROVEN TO BE AUTHENTIC?
Too bad, dickhead!maineman » 03 Oct 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ This thread is about the Jack Smith filing from yesterday. If you want to start the five thousandth thread about Hunter's laptop, go for it. Don't hijack mine, please?
DeezerShoove » 03 Oct 2024, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ Swing . . . and a miss.
I kept it strictly based on her actions.
Actions that you are, as expected, going to forgive.
Actions you antiTrumpers claim is one of the biggest single things about him you hate.
She wrote and published lies. Even put up pictures trying to back up impossible claims.
So, your defense is a 7th graders taunt?![]()
And you want to be our forum expert on some douche bag's whining legalize?
It's been overnight since you said you'd read it. Did you?
Zeets2 » 03 Oct 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ Too bad, dickhead!
Once you disparage Trump for your made-up **** "crimes", my post shows the absolute validity of Trump's claims on how the election was stolen, which clearly resulted in the perfectly justifiable demonstration that occurred on Jan. 6th.
You can put it to rest easily enough if you can factually deny that the corrupt media in cooperation with the unethical and sordidly dishonest Biden campaign and with the help of the corrupt FBI intentionally interfered with the election by stifling and lying about the stories that if revealed, would have easily given Trump a landslide victory in 2020!
Go ahead and try to deny it!
OK, fine!
Indeed, so what? Why is that comment in any way interesting?.. I also think 'so what?', and also think 'so what?' about Trump saying 'so what?'maineman » 02 Oct 2024, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑ I am going to spend the evening reading the entire 165 pages, but an interesting tidbit is this from page 142:
"Upon receiving a phone call alerting him that Pence had been taken to a secure location,[REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #15] rushed to the dining room to inform the defendant in hopes that the defendant would take action to ensure Pence’s safety. Instead,after [REDACTED NAME OF PERSON #15] delivered the news, the defendant looked at him and said only, “So what?""