Liberal Forum

*Vegas » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Like I said, you can't even recognize level 2+. 

"ask me why" is redundant. Here is why you do that:

Just because you've progressed from being a marginal at best prospect to a fat hairy smelly lump you'd shoot hour dog for mounting, doesn't mean the fun has to stop for us celebrated boulevardiers.

Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

Just because you've progressed from being a marginal at best prospect to a fat hairy smelly lump you'd shoot hour dog for mounting, doesn't mean the fun has to stop for us celebrated boulevardiers.

   

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Just because you've progressed from being a marginal at best prospect to a fat hairy smelly lump you'd shoot hour dog for mounting, doesn't mean the fun has to stop for us celebrated boulevardiers.

I see all my mirrors I am throwing at you are working. 

Introspection to a narcissist is like sunlight to a vampire.   

*Vegas » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

27 minutes ago

I see all my mirrors I am throwing at you are working. 

Introspection to a narcissist is like sunlight to a vampire. 

Go look in one...

What self respecting woman, capable of informed consent, would find you sexually enticing?

Blackvegetable » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

27 minutes ago

Go look in one...

What self respecting woman, capable of informed consent, would find you sexually enticing?

Another **** question. 

Until you can post a law that forces women to get pregnant to begin with, your whole argument is null and void. 
 

DeezerShoove » Today, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:12 am

In the end I don't much care either way.
The fake posturing and "getting people on my side" **** bothers me.

Stupid and/or naive are on both sides of this issue.

I call ****. They both annoy me.

in my state the commericals go on and on about not getting help for miscarriages but what is on the ballot though is abortion up to  6 months -viability- 

a big dfference
 
 

Blackvegetable » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

37 minutes ago

Go look in one...

What self respecting woman, capable of informed consent, would find you sexually enticing?

what do you say about healthy babies aborted at viability for no medical reason?

jerrab » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

in my state the commericals go on and on about not getting help for miscarriages but what is on the ballot though is abortion up to  6 months -viability- 

a big dfference

None of those type of details concern me regarding my post.
...except one thing you mentioned.
**** advertising.

DeezerShoove » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

None of those type of details concern me regarding my post.
...except one thing you mentioned.
**** advertising.

they conveniently don't mention abortion up to 6 months in the commercials

deceptive  advertising,

jerrab » 46 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

46 minutes ago

what do you say about healthy babies aborted at viability for no medical reason?

Because giving birth continues to present health risks which should be entirely at the risk bearers discretion.
No one should be coerced to take a pregnancy to term.

I'm still waiting for an answer.



 

jerrab » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

they conveniently don't mention abortion up to 6 months in the commercials

deceptive  advertising,

Why is that a matter of public will?

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Because giving birth continues to present health risks which should be entirely at the risk bearers discretion.
No one should be coerced to take a pregnancy to term.

I'm still waiting for an answer.

nothing about that is mentioned in the bill.

jerrab » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

nothing about that is mentioned in the bill.

Of course not.

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Because giving birth continues to present health risks which should be entirely at the risk bearers discretion.
No one should be coerced to take a pregnancy to term.

I'm still waiting for an answer.

nothing about medical risk in the bill. 

Missouri Amendment 3: Abortion Rights
Amendment 3 on the Missouri general election ballot would overturn the state’s abortion ban and enshrine the right to an abortion in the Missouri Constitution, legalizing the practice up until the point of fetal viability.

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Of course not.

but you said it. so why?

jerrab » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

29 minutes ago

they conveniently don't mention abortion up to 6 months in the commercials

deceptive  advertising,

If it weren't for advertising or making voices heard (the correct ones, that is),
I believe half the ills of the planet would calm down.

**** lemmings believe OTHER PEOPLE'S ****.
That's why Aunt Fern has tattoos. And her sister has hair the color of a cheap bath mat.
*** have parades about what? Pride in dick sucking.
Schools teach crap nobody will ever use . . . for anything. Because some asswipe got hurt feelings.

Making me "aware" was a trend. **** your "aware", lemming leader. <- That's what I think of advertising.
 

jerrab » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

but you said it. so why?

Because it answered the question you asked.

Nod.


 

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Why is that a matter of public will?

up  to viabiliity is never mentioned in the commericials that go non stop day and night.  

WHY?

Missouri Amendment 3: Abortion Rights
Amendment 3 on the Missouri general election ballot would overturn the state’s abortion ban and enshrine the right to an abortion in the Missouri Constitution, legalizing the practice up until the point of fetal viability.
 

jerrab » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

up  to viabiliity is never mentioned in the commericials that go non stop day and night.  

WHY?

Missouri Amendment 3: Abortion Rights
Amendment 3 on the Missouri general election ballot would overturn the state’s abortion ban and enshrine the right to an abortion in the Missouri Constitution, legalizing the practice up until the point of fetal viability.

Answer the question.

Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Answer the question.

There you go again.  Yep, I will do your numbers again. 

This is why you do this incessantly: 

Narcissists demand answers to their questions but refuse to answer any themselves as part of a larger strategy to maintain control, exert dominance, and protect their fragile egos. This behavior reflects their need to control conversations, avoid accountability, and manipulate interactions to their advantage. Here are the key reasons behind this pattern:In Summary:

• Control and power: Demanding answers keeps them in control of the conversation, while refusing to answer ensures they remain dominant.
• Avoiding accountability: They evade responsibility and scrutiny by deflecting questions directed at them.
• Projection of superiority: They believe they are above the need to explain or justify themselves.
• Manipulation and gaslighting: They use questions to manipulate and destabilize others, while avoiding answers to stay unchallenged.
• Fear of vulnerability: Answering questions would expose them to criticism or rejection, so they avoid it.
• Dodging responsibility: Refusing to answer helps them avoid acknowledging mistakes or wrongdoing.

Sources:

• “The Narcissist You Know” by Joseph Burgo discusses the manipulative behaviors of narcissists, including how they demand answers while avoiding accountability themselves.
• Dr. Ramani Durvasula, a clinical psychologist, explains how narcissists use deflection and control tactics in conversations, demanding answers while refusing to provide any, in her books and videos.
• “Why Is It Always About You?” by Sandy Hotchkiss outlines how narcissists create double standards by expecting others to justify themselves while avoiding any personal accountability.