Liberal Forum

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:06 pm

Only if it applies to them personally. An elderly woman nor a Christian woman don't give a **** about the abortion issue. You don't give a **** about democracy, so you don't even get to comment on that. The fact that you celebrate your nominee bypassing the voters is indisputable evidence of that. 

It's about what people prioritize during the time. Are they sick and tired of working hard just to see that they can't make ends meet anyway? If so, that is a priority.

wow.  You think that elderly women aren't mothers and grandmothers, too?  Do you think that husbands and fathers of young girls aren't concerned for the women in their lives just because they themselves have penises instead of uteruses? And do you honestly think that all Christians are automatically anti-abortion?

I get to comment on whatever the **** I want to comment on.  I celebrate the fact that my party is extremely happy about our nominee and I am betting that the electorate at large will choose her over the bumbling, bloviating, felonious clown.  We'll know who is right soon enough.

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 08 Oct 2024, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Oct 2024, 7:15 pm

cultist 
 

Cocksucker.

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:21 pm

wow.  You think that elderly women aren't mothers and grandmothers, too?  Do you think that husbands and fathers of young girls aren't concerned for the women in their lives just because they themselves have penises instead of uteruses? And do you honestly think that all Christians are automatically anti-abortion?

I get to comment on whatever the **** I want to comment on.  I celebrate the fact that my party is extremely happy about our nominee and I am betting that the electorate at large will choose her over the bumbling, bloviating, felonious clown.  We'll know who is right soon enough.

You cocksuckers have rigged it. You bastards already tried murder trump twice.

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:19 pm

There logic is what I read into *******. Logic and reason is what guided me. You wouldn't know. 

You still have no idea what they said. You still never read it. It was longer than 5 words, so I am not surprised.

Stop prattling and answer the question asked..

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:21 pm

wow.  You think that elderly women aren't mothers and grandmothers, too?  Do you think that husbands and fathers of young girls aren't concerned for the women in their lives just because they themselves have penises instead of uteruses? And do you honestly think that all Christians are automatically anti-abortion?

 

Sure. Most left-wingers care. The point is that at the end of the day, people want to make ends meet so they can support their families. That is a daily concern that people have. Literally daily. Every day that issue applies. Abortion isn't always going to be on everybody's minds on a day to day basis. It doesn't have that effect like financial security does.

I get to comment on whatever the **** I want to comment on.  I celebrate the fact that my party is extremely happy about our nominee and I am betting that the electorate at large will choose her over the bumbling, bloviating, felonious clown.  We'll know who is right soon enough.

Of course you can comment on whatever. You can make an *** out of yourself all you want. Be my guest. The point being that you can't say that you support democracy while celebrating Harris's nomination after the dims and her  bypassed the citizen's consent. However, if you wish to be a pathetic and disgusting hypocrite, then have at it. 

Blackvegetable » 09 Oct 2024, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:28 pm

Stop prattling and answer the question asked..

The usual. Demands answers to his questions, but refuses to answer anyone else. 

Same old ****. 

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm

The usual. Demands answers to his questions, but refuses to answer anyone else. 

Same old ****.

So you admit you didn't answer.
 

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm

Sure. Most left-wingers care. The point is that at the end of the day, people want to make ends meet so they can support their families. That is a daily concern that people have. Literally daily. Every day that issue applies. Abortion isn't always going to be on everybody's minds on a day to day basis. It doesn't have that effect like financial security does.

Of course you can comment on whatever. You can make an *** out of yourself all you want. Be my guest. The point being that you can't say that you support democracy while celebrating Harris's nomination after the dims and her  bypassed the citizen's consent. However, if you wish to be a pathetic and disgusting hypocrite, then have at it.

Is that more likely to happen because they are unemployed?

Blackvegetable » 09 Oct 2024, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:33 pm

So you admit you didn't answer.

Where did I admit that? I said that you are demanding answers while evading others...like you do daily. 


Ask me why.

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:17 pm

Yes, there are other important factors.  But it shouldn't be a surprise that a person's financial struggles might take the lead.

MIGHT?  I thought Forbes and you claimed it always did?

I think that there ARE many factors, and I think that many of them, while not weighted #1, may be weighted more than others.  I think if a voter were to consider the economy, the abortion issue, the environmental catastrophe, January 6th redux, and God only knows how many other issues are on their minds, Even if the most heavily weighted issue tips them one way, the cumulative weight of many others can certainly tip them in the other direction.

Blackvegetable » 09 Oct 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:35 pm

Is that more likely to happen because they are unemployed?

Idiot. If I said that someone is stressed because they work hard while still not making ends meet, does that sound like that person would be unemployed you dumb pile of dog ****? 

This is what happens when you don't read. You make an *** out of yourself. 

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:37 pm

MIGHT?  I thought Forbes and you claimed it always did?

I think that there ARE many factors, and I think that many of them, while not weighted #1, may be weighted more than others.  I think if a voter were to consider the economy, the abortion issue, the environmental catastrophe, January 6th redux, and God only knows how many other issues are on their minds, Even if the most heavily weighted issue tips them one way, the cumulative weight of many others can certainly tip them in the other direction.

I didn't say it always did. I said it was a TREND! You read about as well as @Blackvegetable  

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm

Sure. Most left-wingers care. The point is that at the end of the day, people want to make ends meet so they can support their families. That is a daily concern that people have. Literally daily. Every day that issue applies. Abortion isn't always going to be on everybody's minds on a day to day basis. It doesn't have that effect like financial security does.

Of course you can comment on whatever. You can make an *** out of yourself all you want. Be my guest. The point being that you can't say that you support democracy while celebrating Harris's nomination after the dims and her  bypassed the citizen's consent. However, if you wish to be a pathetic and disgusting hypocrite, then have at it.

You do realize that American political parties have a long, long history of selecting their presidential candidates precisely that way?  And I REPEAT:  I am a **** lifelong democrat.  All but one of my greater family tree of siblings, cousins, nieces, nephews, my children, and their spouses are Democrats.  My greater circle of friends are all Democrats.  The VAST majority of the members of my HOA in a 55+ condo community of HUNDREDS of condos are Democrats.  NONE of them felt cheated or "bypassed."  ALL of them are ELATED about Kamala and Tim.  "Harris/Walz" signs are in dozens and dozens of front windows.  There are at least a dozen "Republicans for Harris/Walz" sings.  There are no "Trump/Vance" signs to be seen.   We were not bypassed.  Our president did a noble and patriotic thing, and his timing was spot on. He waited until Trump had picked his junkyard-dog running mate and created a ticket designed to beat Biden/Harris. It was BRILLIANT!  Childless cat ladies are comin' to getcha!

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:39 pm

I didn't say it always did. I said it was a TREND! You read about as well as @Blackvegetable

Atypical elections typically don't follow trends.  America knows that there is much more at stake than the cost of their bacon.

 

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:48 pm

You do realize that American political parties have a long, long history of selecting their presidential candidates precisely that way?  And I REPEAT:  I am a **** lifelong democrat.  All but one of my greater family tree of siblings, cousins, nieces, nephews, my children, and their spouses are Democrats.  My greater circle of friends are all Democrats.  The VAST majority of the members of my HOA in a 55+ condo community of HUNDREDS of condos are Democrats.  NONE of them felt cheated or "bypassed."  ALL of them are ELATED about Kamala and Tim.  "Harris/Walz" signs are in dozens and dozens of front windows.  There are at least a dozen "Republicans for Harris/Walz" sings.  There are no "Trump/Vance" signs to be seen.   We were not bypassed.  Our president did a noble and patriotic thing, and his timing was spot on. He waited until Trump had picked his junkyard-dog running mate and created a ticket designed to beat Biden/Harris. It was BRILLIANT!  Childless cat ladies are comin' to getcha!

I got to tell ya, I stopped reading when you started telling me about your family history on the account that I don't give a **** about your family history. 

If you have something with substance to say about the OP, then get on with it. Your family tree doesn't interest me. 

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:39 pm

I didn't say it always did. I said it was a TREND! You read about as well as @Blackvegetable

You remind me of golf boy... his dyslexia made him incapable of reading longer posts, so he always wrote his replies about the first sentence, and ignored the meat of the post.  

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:50 pm

Atypical elections typically don't follow trends.  America knows that there is much more at stake than the cost of their bacon.

****. Forbes made a damn good argument as to the trend they are claiming. You still can't refute it. You have tried, but you have failed miserably. 

 

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:51 pm

I got to tell ya, I stopped reading when you started telling me about your family history on the account that I don't give a **** about your family history. 

If you have something with substance to say about the OP, then get on with it. Your family tree doesn't interest me.

golfboy.... is that you?  

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:51 pm

You remind me of golf boy... his dyslexia made him incapable of reading longer posts, so he always wrote his replies about the first sentence, and ignored the meat of the post.

You sound like Blackvegtable. He is the one that doesn't read posts. Talk to him. 

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:52 pm

golfboy.... is that you?

Are you hurt that I don't care about your family?