Listing the Democrats I know was what I was doing. You can't read beyond the first sentence - or when you do, you realize that my fourth, fifth, and sixth sentences kick your ***, so you ignore them.
Why should I waste time on irrelevant crap? That's on you. Now if you want to talk about relevant comments, then produce them only.maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Listing the Democrats I know was what I was doing. You can't read beyond the first sentence - or when you do, you realize that my fourth, fifth, and sixth sentences kick your ***, so you ignore them.![]()
run along now.
**** you liar.
Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Why should I waste time on irrelevant crap? That's on you. Now if you want to talk about relevant comments, then produce them only.
Look, I whipped you. Ok? No need to congratulate me, it's all good.![]()
Run along now.
Pot...kettle...black.maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ You, whose posts are irrelevant crap literally from start to finish, really should not write that first sentence.
I cannot even tell you how many presidential elections I have witnessed that people said the exact same thing. "This election is different" "This is an election that we have never seen before." "This is an atypical election." Etc...blah blah blah. Literally every election since Reagan I have heard that crap. All elections are different. That's the whole damn point of a democratic election...to throw out the old and get in the new. Duh.My point stands: this is a totally atypical election and voters may very well have concerns about the economy, but in this very unique election, their concerns about the survival of our democratic republic, their concerns about the erosion of women's rights, and their revulsion of the bumbling felon on the top of the GOP ticket may very well, trump their concerns about the cost of bacon.
You were the one that declared that you kicked my *** first. Again, pot...kettle...black.And you can always pick out a true e-toughguy, (aka internet loser) - they always feel compelled to declare victory.![]()
Arguing with you is like trying to play chess with a pigeon.
TTFN
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 2_6j37.pdfVegas » 09 Oct 2024, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Pot...kettle...black.
I cannot even tell you how many presidential elections I have witnessed that people said the exact same thing. "This election is different" "This is an election that we have never seen before." "This is an atypical election." Etc...blah blah blah. Literally every election since Reagan I have heard that crap. All elections are different. That's the whole damn point of a democratic election...to throw out the old and get in the new. Duh.
This is not the only election about women's rights issue. You guys bring that up against every damn Repubican that runs. Literally, every single one...no seriously. Every. Single. One. For every election, it is always the same **** against the Repubs: Women's rights, racism, Hitler's clone...yada yada yada...
You were the one that declared that you kicked my *** first. Again, pot...kettle...black.
No. I don't. CNN said it will be an issue, but that doesn't it mean it will. Only sheep like you, BV, and RetardedHorse care about what your media says.maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 6:13 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 2_6j37.pdf
In 2022, SCOTUS took away a basic right for half of our population. Every special election since then has hurt the GOP because of it. And you think it will suddenly NOT be an issue in 2024?
Ugggghhhh Jan 6 again. You guys won't stop with that. The only people who give a **** about that are the CNN sheep. How many people do you know walk around talking about Jan 6 on a daily basis vs how many are talking about the prices of food or gas?Not to mention J6.
The Hitler clone line probably would work better for you if your own Vice Presidential candidate made that exact comparison.![]()
Again, you are under the delusions that there are millions of people who care. I can say the same about the unions not supporting Harris. Your point?How can any Republican NOT at least ask themselves the question: "If Mike Pence, Donald Trump's own Vice President cannot and will not endorse him, why should I?"
Oh wow! Hey look everybody. Since Maineman had a personal observation in his own neighborhood and in his life, then by default, that means everybody has the same experience all over the US.In my neighborhood, there are "Republicans for Harris/Walz" signs... at least a dozen. I have been alive for eighteen presidential elections, but I will say that I have been aware of only seventeen of them. I remember watching Adlai Stevenson accept the nomination in Chicago in 1956. In all the elections since then, I have NEVER seen any signs that proclaimed the sign's owner was a member of the opposing party but was endorsing the opposition. Never. This IS a different election. It is the FIRST election where one of the parties put up a convicted felon for the highest office in the land. That matters to some folks of character who put country above party. Obviously, you are not one of THEM.
That has never been in question!
There is something funny about that, the way Kamala became the chosen one out of nowhere, Obama talking about an open primary and then suddenly turn around and endorse the Ho, no questions asked, joy everywhere.. who is behind that, Kamala doesn't have that much influence, but if she has handlers why did they let her pick Waltz, it just doesn't make sense..Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ She was not on any primary ballot. Yet, the delegates just magically inserted her.
You know it. I know it. She got 0 votes from the people.
Now deal with it.
Rigged it how this time?Vegas » 08 Oct 2024, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ I started a thread a while back showing how the silent majority tend to vote. Forbes did a good piece on it. A historical trend showed that people vote according to how they feel the economy is doing at the time. That's about it. They don't vote according to what the stats and polls say. If they feel they are struggling, then they vote for the new party and vote out the old. They can't put in the stats about the GDP, inflation, unemployment numbers into their gas tank nor can they pay for their food with it. It's a personal vote. Thus, if they personally feel they are struggling, then they vote accordingly.
It won't matter this election because the dims have already rigged the election, just like they did in 2020.
Jantje_Smit » 11 Oct 2024, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑ There is something funny about that, the way Kamala became the chosen one out of nowhere, Obama talking about an open primary and then suddenly turn around and endorse the Ho, no questions asked, joy everywhere.. who is behind that, Kamala doesn't have that much influence, but if she has handlers why did they let her pick Waltz, it just doesn't make sense..
![]()
https://youtu.be/Z_MGjcPiCUE
Arguing with you is like trying to play chess with a pigeon.maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ You, whose posts are irrelevant crap literally from start to finish, really should not write that first sentence.
My point stands: this is a totally atypical election and voters may very well have concerns about the economy, but in this very unique election, their concerns about the survival of our democratic republic, their concerns about the erosion of women's rights, and their revulsion of the bumbling felon on the top of the GOP ticket may very well, trump their concerns about the cost of bacon.
And you can always pick out a true e-toughguy, (aka internet loser) - they always feel compelled to declare victory.![]()
Arguing with you is like trying to play chess with a pigeon.
TTFN
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 11 Oct 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ Arguing with you is like trying to play chess with a pigeon.
Pure genius
TTFN?maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ You, whose posts are irrelevant crap literally from start to finish, really should not write that first sentence.
My point stands: this is a totally atypical election and voters may very well have concerns about the economy, but in this very unique election, their concerns about the survival of our democratic republic, their concerns about the erosion of women's rights, and their revulsion of the bumbling felon on the top of the GOP ticket may very well, trump their concerns about the cost of bacon.
And you can always pick out a true e-toughguy, (aka internet loser) - they always feel compelled to declare victory.![]()
Arguing with you is like trying to play chess with a pigeon.
TTFN
Jantje_Smit » 11 Oct 2024, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ No doubt, but the question is who is doing the rigging, it isn't the same ones that did it for Biden and why are they all going along with it, it can be just because of the TDS...
![]()
Indeed, so why choose Kamala..Vegas » 11 Oct 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ I don't know. The dims have a huge underground network of dishonest and corrupt losers to choose from.
