Liberal Forum

BooRadley » 09 Oct 2024, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 10:12 am

Maineman has me on ignore..

Can someone ask him this...??
Thank you

The women who want the get the government out of their uteruses?

But at the same time you're okay with Biden and Harris FIRING people that didn't want to take the vaccine..

Wanna explain?

Pregnancy, though potentially fatal, is not contageous.

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 10:25 am

Acknowledge that you made an *** out of your self first and that you are one dumb pos.

Then I will answer. Actually, the answer is literally in the OP. But that would require you to read.

Just answer.

Blackvegetable » 09 Oct 2024, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 10:26 am

Just answer.

Just read. I am not your mother. 

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 10:27 am

Just read. I am not your mother.

It refers to "polls"...

Polls are how we know how "they" feel about their circumstances.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Oct 2024, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 10:37 am

It refers to "polls"...

Polls are how we know "they" feel about their circumstances.

Post what you think the polls mean to the voter. 

 

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 10:38 am

Post what you think the polls mean to the voter.

Which polls?

Blackvegetable » 09 Oct 2024, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 10:41 am

Which polls?

Uggghhhhh God. Post why it doesn't matter. 

You have the reading comprehension of a fruit fly. 

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 10:42 am

Uggghhhhh God. Post why it doesn't matter. 

You have the reading comprehension of a fruit fly.

Again I answer, while you evade.

Blackvegetable » 09 Oct 2024, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 10:49 am

Again I answer, while you evade.

No *******. You didn't answer. You refused to read, so now you want a mother to hold your hand. 

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 10:14 am

You are overjoyed with the people of the United States being overlooked. Spoken like a true tyrant.

The people aren't overlooked at all.  Maybe you haven't noticed, but the Democrats are all ecstatic! 

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 10:13 am

Forbes did their numbers also. They are just as impressive. I prefer them over your sources. You have a habit of posting ****.

I wonder how many Forbes has gotten right as compared to Lichtman?

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:15 am

I wonder how many Forbes has gotten right as compared to Lichtman?

In this case, you need to ask which makes more sense. A vote is a personal act, not a group act. Yes, they are counted as groups, but the individual vote itself is a personal act from each person. Therefore, it makes sense that each person would vote in accordance with their own personal circumstance. If voter A is having difficulty paying for the essentials and is struggling to get by, then voter A will want a change. Thus, they will vote out the current party. Even if the stats say that everything is just peachy, because things are not just peachy to voter A. 

That makes a lot more sense. 

Blackvegetable » 09 Oct 2024, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 10:26 am

Pregnancy, though potentially fatal, is not contagious.

BV...do me a favor:  tell that vile doxxing ****, @BooRadley, that I will NEVER answer her questions, even if posed by a proxy.  I hope she steps off a curb in front of a truck and gets smushed.  Then, maybe then, I'd travel down to Beantown, pay her a visit in whatever potter's field they plant her corpse, and piss on her.

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:19 am

BV...do me a favor:  tell that vile doxxing ****, @BooRadley, that I will NEVER answer her questions, even if posed by a proxy.  I hope she steps off a curb in front of a truck and gets smushed.  Then, maybe then, I'd travel down to Beantown, pay her a visit in whatever potter's field they plant her corpse, and piss on her.

Can't match your eloquence, but will do.

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:19 am

In this case, you need to ask which makes more sense. A vote is a personal act, not a group act. Yes, they are counted as groups, but the individual vote itself is a personal act from each person. Therefore, it makes sense that each person would vote in accordance with their own personal circumstance. If voter A is having difficulty paying for the essentials and is struggling to get by, then voter A will want a change. Thus, they will vote out the current party. Even if the stats say that everything is just peachy, because things are not just peachy to voter A. 

That makes a lot more sense.

I just asked you a simple question:  Has Forbes correctly predicted the Presidential elections as often as Allan Lichtman?  If you know the answer, I'd love to hear it.  It seems like you think I WANTED to get served a bowl of word salad instead.  I didn't.  

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:22 am

I just asked you a simple question:  Has Forbes correctly predicted the Presidential elections as often as Allan Lichtman?  If you know the answer, I'd love to hear it.  It seems like you think I WANTED to get served a bowl of word salad instead.  I didn't.

I don't care about his predictions. I care about what is logical. There are too many factors that go into these guy's predictions that could easily coincidently be correct, but not correct for the right reason.

Again, you can't think in terms of more than one variable. You are a linear thinker. You look at an answer in terms of ratio comparisons without looking into other factors. 

Your lack of intellectual capacity to think deeper is not my problem. 

Blackvegetable » 09 Oct 2024, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:20 am

Can't match your eloquence, but will do.

His eloquence is about as impressive as yours. Though we will never know because you just copy/paste ****. 

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:26 am

I don't care about his predictions. I care about what is logical. There are too many factors that go into these guy's predictions that could easily coincidently be correct, but not correct for the right reason.

Again, you can't think in terms of more than one variable. You are a linear thinker. You look at an answer in terms of ratio comparisons without looking into other factors. 

Your lack of intellectual capacity to think deeper is not my problem.

But you care about Forbe's predictions.

Got it.

You're a **** hypocrite, and I am gonna rub your nose in it on November 6th, inshallah!

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:26 am

I don't care about his predictions. I care about what is logical. There are too many factors that go into these guy's predictions that could easily coincidently be correct, but not correct for the right reason.

Again, you can't think in terms of more than one variable. You are a linear thinker. You look at an answer in terms of ratio comparisons without looking into other factors. 

Your lack of intellectual capacity to think deeper is not my problem.

You leverage a profound ignorance with an unusually low IQ.

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:39 am

But you care about Forbe's predictions.

Got it.

You're a **** hypocrite, and I am gonna rub your nose in it on November 6th, inshallah!

Repeatedly debunking his own media comment...