Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 09 Oct 2024, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:41 am

You leverage a profound ignorance with an unusually low IQ.

Projection. As always, you do nothing to refute it. Yet, you post anyway for no other reason than to make an *** out of yourself. 

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:39 am

But you care about Forbe's predictions.

Got it.

You're a **** hypocrite, and I am gonna rub your nose in it on November 6th, inshallah!

I care about the logic they used. 

Something that you clearly lack. 

And further... this is a totally atypical election. There is so much more at stake than merely our pocketbooks or our grocery bills.

To assume that every voter is a single-issue voter or that every voter will make their decision based upon their personal view of the economy without regard to the future of our DEMOCRACY, the future of women's rights, or the future of the world order is asinine

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:45 am

Projection. As always, you do nothing to refute it. Yet, you post anyway for no other reason than to make an *** out of yourself.

Refute what.....your squealings?

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:46 am

I care about the logic they used. 

Something that you clearly lack.

Are you saying that Allan Lichtman does not use LOGIC?

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:47 am

Are you saying that Allan Lichtman does not use LOGIC?

I don't see it. I can be correct about winning football bets several times in a row. That doesn't mean it was because the logic I used. I clearly could have gotten lucky. 


Here is the thing. You called the logic that Forbes and I used a 'word salad.' You didn't even make an effort to refute it. You gave a copout instead. 
If you genuinely believe that reason and logic equates to a word salad, then I can't help you. 
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Oct 2024, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:46 am

Refute what.....

Look at this. Now he acts like he doesn't know. 

Ask me why you pretend to not know things that was just discussed.  Go ahead, ask me why. 

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:51 am

I don't see it. I can be correct about winning football bets several times in a row. That doesn't mean it was because the logic I used. I clearly could have gotten lucky. 

Here is the thing. You called the logic that Forbes and I used a 'word salad.' You didn't even make an effort to refute it. You gave a copout instead. 
If you genuinely believe that reason and logic equates to a word salad, then I can't help you.

I asked you a question and you avoided answering it.  Did you read the entire article about the various tests that Lichtman applies, or... lemme guess... it was TLDR and you quit reading after the first paragraph.

Again..YOUR logic says that the economy is THE overriding factor for ALL voters and that is simply not the case.  I could give a **** about how well the economy is doing right now.  I have NEVER voted because of the economy and how it affects me.  NEVER.

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:46 am

And further... this is a totally atypical election. There is so much more at stake than merely our pocketbooks or our grocery bills.

To assume that every voter is a single-issue voter or that every voter will make their decision based upon their personal view of the economy without regard to the future of our DEMOCRACY, the future of women's rights, or the future of the world order is asinine

this one's for you @Vegas  

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:55 am

this one's for you @Vegas

Only if it applies to them personally. An elderly woman nor a Christian woman don't give a **** about the abortion issue. You don't give a **** about democracy, so you don't even get to comment on that. The fact that you celebrate your nominee bypassing the voters is indisputable evidence of that. 

It's about what people prioritize during the time. Are they sick and tired of working hard just to see that they can't make ends meet anyway? If so, that is a priority.

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:55 am

I asked you a question and you avoided answering it.  Did you read the entire article about the various tests that Lichtman applies, or... lemme guess... it was TLDR and you quit reading after the first paragraph.

Again..YOUR logic says that the economy is THE overriding factor for ALL voters and that is simply not the case.  I could give a **** about how well the economy is doing right now.  I have NEVER voted because of the economy and how it affects me.  NEVER.

I already told you that it doesn't matter. You not liking my answer doesn't mean I didn;t answer. It just means that you are butthurt. Get over it. 

So you personally don't give a **** about how the economy automatically means that nobody else does either. Good lord. Do you ever listen to your self-righteous  enormous ego? 

 
 

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 11:52 am

Look at this. Now he acts like he doesn't know. 

Ask me why you pretend to not know things that was just discussed.  Go ahead, ask me why.

Why bother refuting your unsupported squealings?

Blackvegetable » 09 Oct 2024, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:09 pm

Why bother refuting your unsupported squealings?

And there is the copout. You always use the same copout when cornered. 

Ask me why you do that. 

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:08 pm

I already told you that it doesn't matter. You not liking my answer doesn't mean I didn;t answer.........Do you ever listen to your self-righteous  enormous ego?
 

Dumbest **** on the Innertubes

Blackvegetable » 09 Oct 2024, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:11 pm

Dumbest **** on the Innertubes

Again, no rebuttal. The same old, same old. 

Watch this: The same copout is coming. 

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:08 pm

I already told you that it doesn't matter. You not liking my answer doesn't mean I didn;t answer. It just means that you are butthurt. Get over it. 

So you personally don't give a **** about how the economy automatically means that nobody else does either. Good lord. Do you ever listen to your self-righteous  enormous ego?

No... I never implied that assumption.  I point out that your OP states that Forbes suggests that a historical trend showed that people vote according to how they feel the economy is doing at the time.  I pointed out that, especially in an atypical election such as this one, there are other important factors to consider as well.  

Vegas » 09 Oct 2024, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:10 pm

And there is the copout. You always use the same copout when cornered. 

Ask me why you do that.

I'll ask you to explain if Forbes is part of the MSM..

Of course, you'll run

maineman » 09 Oct 2024, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:15 pm

No... I never implied that assumption.  I point out that your OP states that Forbes suggests that a historical trend showed that people vote according to how they feel the economy is doing at the time.  I pointed out that, especially in an atypical election such as this one, there are other important factors to consider as well.

Yes, there are other important factors.  But it shouldn't be a surprise that a person's financial struggles might take the lead. 

Blackvegetable » 09 Oct 2024, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Oct 2024, 12:15 pm

I'll ask you to explain if Forbes is part of the MSM..

Of course, you'll run

There logic is what I read into *******. Logic and reason is what guided me. You wouldn't know. 

You still have no idea what they said. You still never read it. It was longer than 5 words, so I am not surprised. 

maineman » 08 Oct 2024, 4:34 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Oct 2024, 4:34 pm

ANY proof of that?

Traitor Bastards like you don't accept proof.