Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Someone posted this mocking retarded Americans
Someone posted this mocking retarded Americans
By LowIQTrash
8 Oct 2024 11:35 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
9 Oct 2024 4:30 pm
social security tax is less and it is not taken out after 167,000. lift the cap of the amount of how much money is taxed for social security.Fuelman » 09 Oct 2024, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Educate yourself.
As a result of changes to Social Security enacted in 1983, benefits are now expected to be payable in full on a timely basis until 2037, when the trust fund reserves are projected to become exhausted.1 At the point where the reserves are used up, continuing taxes are expected to be enough to pay 76 percent of scheduled benefits. Thus, the Congress will need to make changes to the scheduled benefits and revenue sources for the program in the future. The Social Security Board of Trustees project that changes equivalent to an immediate reduction in benefits of about 13 percent, or an immediate increase in the combined payroll tax rate from 12.4 percent to 14.4 percent, or some combination of these changes, would be sufficient to allow full payment of the scheduled benefits for the next 75 years
https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v70 ... 3p111.html
edit//// $168,600
Social Security tax is calculated as a percentage of gross earnings. Every year, the government sets a limit on the amount of your earnings that can be taxed for Social Security. That limit in 2024 is $168,600, up from $160,200 in 2023
9 Oct 2024 4:33 pm
jerrab » 09 Oct 2024, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑ social security tax is less and it is not taken out after 167,000. lift the cap of the amount of how much money is taxed for social security.
edit//// $168,600
Social Security tax is calculated as a percentage of gross earnings. Every year, the government sets a limit on the amount of your earnings that can be taxed for Social Security. That limit in 2024 is $168,600, up from $160,200 in 2023
6.2 percent
Social Security is financed through a dedicated payroll tax. Employers and employees each pay 6.2 percent of wages up to the taxable maximum of $168,600 (in 2024), while the self-employed pay 12.4 percent.
9 Oct 2024 4:35 pm
there are things that are not our choices.
being born into rich families is one.
9 Oct 2024 4:41 pm
nefarious101 » 09 Oct 2024, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑ A thread that expresses jealousy, envy and copious amounts of BOO HOO
lifting the cap from 168,000 to 200,000 would not hurt millionaires and then taxing 3 per cent from 200,000 to 215,000 definitely would not hurt.
9 Oct 2024 4:50 pm
jerrab » 09 Oct 2024, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑ lifting the cap from 168,000 to 200,000 would not hurt millionaires and then taxing 3 per cent from 200,000 to 215,000 definitely would not hurt.
No one is stopping you from writing a check,,,but you don't do you? 200,000 is not rich to....you maybe it is.
Leave other people's money and property alone....they don't need you telling them what's right or not
9 Oct 2024 5:00 pm
Was it love at 2nd sight?
9 Oct 2024 5:02 pm
No, just meanness.
I already hate obama in 2012. It was an anger vote - anger at tone-deaf, retarded repukes for running a wall street raider on the very heels of wall street raiding us.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
9 Oct 2024 5:03 pm
LOL. And 4 years previous Insane McCain.Cannonpointer » 09 Oct 2024, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑ No, just meanness.
I already hate obama in 2012. It was an anger vote - anger at tone-deaf, retarded repukes for running a wall street raider on the very heels of wall street raiding us.
9 Oct 2024 5:08 pm
He had literally insisted that he was identical in every way to the outgoing pariah. Talk about farking TONE DEAF...
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
9 Oct 2024 5:15 pm
Remember the hilarious phrase he and Palin parroted daily..."we are mavericks" .Cannonpointer » 09 Oct 2024, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ He had literally insisted that he was identical in every way to the outgoing pariah. Talk about farking TONE DEAF...
9 Oct 2024 5:43 pm
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
9 Oct 2024 5:45 pm
the problem being with congress, they're all rich so it's not in their best interest to change it...just like term limits...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
9 Oct 2024 5:46 pm
I really don't have sympathy for the selfish rich. it would not be that much anyway.nefarious101 » 09 Oct 2024, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑ No one is stopping you from writing a check,,,but you don't do you? 200,000 is not rich to....you maybe it is.
Leave other people's money and property alone....they don't need you telling them what's right or not
9 Oct 2024 5:49 pm
ROG62 » 09 Oct 2024, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ the problem being with congress, they're all rich so it's not in their best interest to change it...just like term limits...
yes and they will have no problem cutting back social security if they can save themselves a couple of bucks.
they are rich to begin with and their salaries for their 'service' is astronomical.
9 Oct 2024 5:51 pm
ROG62 » 09 Oct 2024, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ the problem being with congress, they're all rich so it's not in their best interest to change it...just like term limits...
AI Overview
Learn more…Opens in new tab
As of January 2009, the salary for a member of the United States Congress has been $174,000 per year. This is due to Congress voting not to accept the annual cost of living adjustment (COLA) increase that is automatically provided for by the Government Ethics Reform Act of 1989.
9 Oct 2024 5:52 pm
ROG62 » 09 Oct 2024, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ the problem being with congress, they're all rich so it's not in their best interest to change it...just like term limits...
AI Overview
Learn more…Opens in new tab
The annual salary for a United States Senator is $174,000, and has been since 2009. This salary is the same for most Senators, Representatives, Delegates, and the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico
9 Oct 2024 6:13 pm
I just puked a little...Sumela » 09 Oct 2024, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Remember the hilarious phrase he and Palin parroted daily..."we are mavericks" .
But I had to admit, Palin was totally ****.
It would be a grudge ****, to be sure - but **** still.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
9 Oct 2024 6:25 pm
jerrab » 09 Oct 2024, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I really don't have sympathy for the selfish rich. it would not be that much anyway.
I don't have any sympathy for the envious poor.....they got enough or they should work harder
9 Oct 2024 6:32 pm
Of course there is a cap unless you want much larger SS monthly payments going to people financially in a better place. You raise that cap but the formula remains the same which results in higher monthly payments for those folks.jerrab » 09 Oct 2024, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑ social security tax is less and it is not taken out after 167,000. lift the cap of the amount of how much money is taxed for social security.
edit//// $168,600
Social Security tax is calculated as a percentage of gross earnings. Every year, the government sets a limit on the amount of your earnings that can be taxed for Social Security. That limit in 2024 is $168,600, up from $160,200 in 2023
Raising the SS payroll tax makes more sense, 2%.
1% for the employee
1%for the employer
We'll be good for another 75 years.
9 Oct 2024 6:32 pm
i have no sympathy for stupid rich. they have enough money. they waste their money on solid gold faucets etc.nefarious101 » 09 Oct 2024, 6:25 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't have any sympathy for the envious poor.....they got enough or they should work harder
Who is online
In total there are 2534 users online :: 15 registered, 15 bots, and 2504 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, FJB, Beekeeper, jerra b, johnedgarslowhorses, jefftec, SouthernFried, nefarious101, sole, ….., Huey
Bots: Disco, LCC, Bolt, proximic, CriteoBot, MicroMessenger, Mediatoolkitbot, DuckDuckBot, SpiderLing, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Googlebot, Applebot, bingbot