So Grifty paid 750 in Federal Income taxes in 16 and 17.*Beekeeper » 15 Oct 2024, 5:16 am » wrote: ↑ It's been posted, DICKFACE CockSwalla!!
It must REALLY SUCK you are so **** STUPID you can't seem to find it.
CURB STOMPED AGAIN, BOY!!
You see, I HAVE THE RETURNS!! YOU DON'T and that means YOU LIED and LIED SOME MORE to cover those LIES you been spreading like you knew something!!
That has to really BLISTER YOUR ***, huh, BOI??
Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2024, 5:29 am » wrote: ↑ So Grifty paid 750 in Federal Income taxes in 16 and 17.
As I stated.
Now what?
I already have, cretin.*Beekeeper » 15 Oct 2024, 5:40 am » wrote: ↑ Nope. YOU have no EVIDENCE of that claim. POST IT OR SHUT THE **** UP!!
I PROVED my claim. NOW YOU PROVE YOURS!! Fact is, he PAID nearly $7.5 MILLION in ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX you stupid **** LOSER PIECE OF ****!!
Damn, those CURB STOMPINGS must be getting mighty tough on that ****** *** of yours, huh??
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Nod.
Gonna need that definition, Tiny...
You are old enough to figure it out on our own, Spoon Fed.
case, Tiny...case.
Do you file a tax return or are retards exempt?Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2024, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑ I already have, cretin.
Here it is...again.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/28/two-str ... taxes.html
Of course it is because he claimed no income.
So he convinced you he's a great bidnessman, but he made less in 16 and 17 than a kid on a paper route.
Thank- you for posting this ....Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2024, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑ I already have, cretin.
Here it is...again.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/28/two-str ... taxes.html
Of course it is because he claimed no income.
So he convinced you he's a great bidnessman, but he made less in 16 and 17 than a kid on a paper route.
Ask your court appointed guardian
This is so **** stupid.Majik » 15 Oct 2024, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑ Thank- you for posting this ....
You have a knack for providing links that completely destroy your own narratives....
case in point ....
according to your link......above.....
Fox's 787 million dollar settlement with Dominion
was a NOL....
and Fox will be able to use this strategy that allows business owners who are facing losses in a given year use the red ink to help offset income – and lower taxes -- in future years.
So, your narrative that Fox paid the ultimate price holds no water ..
They settled for future tax relief on their huge profit margins ....and not because of guilt ....
as you have falsely claimed.....
own it....
But accurate ....
NOL is NET Operating Loss.
Translation = Look them up for me and see if you can prove me right. If you can’t prove me right, maybe it’ll take so long you’ll forget I posted this crap...
And how much would that be over the next 10 years ?Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2024, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ NOL is NET Operating Loss.
Not "Any discreet loss".
They can only carry forward that part which exceeds their earnings.
ROG62 » 15 Oct 2024, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ Translation = Look them up for me and see if you can prove me right. If you can’t prove me right, maybe it’ll take so long you’ll forget I posted this crap...
Are these your words, JuCo?Translation = Look them up for me
post what you said and post the specific tax return
Exactly, bitch...
You're a seriously stupid ****.
Translation = Look them up for me