Liberal Forum

Cedar » Today, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:16 pm

That’s an unconstitutional “rule” implemented by the rogue Biden administration. I suggest you read the “law” passed by congress.
 

Won't matter. That piece of **** will still lie.

*Beekeeper » 14 Oct 2024, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 6:14 am

How much has FEMA given in HANDOUTS to ILLEGALS IN THIS NATION who actually BROKE THE LAWS, CONTRIBUTED NOTHING, and ARE GETTING MORE FREE **** THAN any 5000 AMERICANS EVER GET??

GO!!

legal answer to that is none. Actual answer is ugly as hell.

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 14 Oct 2024, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 12:45 pm

nope

Can You Apply for Asylum After Entering the U.S. Illegally?
Yes, you can apply for asylum even if you entered the U.S. illegally. The U.S. asylum laws do not disqualify individuals solely based on how they entered the country. However, there are some important factors to keep in mind:

1. One-Year Filing Deadline: Generally, you must apply for asylum within one year of your arrival in the U.S. If you entered the country illegally, this deadline still applies. Missing the one-year deadline could make you ineligible for asylum unless you can show extraordinary circumstances that caused the delay.
2. Credible Fear Interview: If you are apprehended by immigration authorities after entering the U.S. illegally, you may be placed in expedited removal proceedings. In this situation, you will undergo a credible fear interview to determine if you have a valid fear of persecution in your home country. If the interview is successful, you may be allowed to apply for asylum.
3. Bars to Asylum: Certain factors can disqualify you from receiving asylum, regardless of how you entered the U.S. These include participating in persecution, posing a security threat, or committing certain crimes. It’s essential to disclose all relevant information to your attorney to assess your eligibility.

Link? Oh wait....you don't have a real one do you?

https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refu ... lum/asylum

Alert Type infoALERT: Court Order on Circumvention of Lawful Pathways Final RuleOn Aug. 3, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California’s order in East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Biden, 18-cv-06810 (N.D. Cal.), vacating the Circumvention of Lawful Pathways (CLP) rule. At this time and while the stay remains in place, USCIS will continue to apply the CLP rule.Under the rule, certain individuals who enter the United States through its southwest land border or adjacent coastal borders are presumed to be ineligible for asylum, unless they can demonstrate an exception to the rule or rebut the presumption. Individuals are encouraged to use lawful, safe, and orderly pathways to come to the United States.

 
They entered illegally. Period. But looney liberals don't care about the law.

EDC4ALL! » 14 Oct 2024, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 1:49 pm

post a link that states ALL asylum seekers entered through a official port of entry....I'll wait.......

They don’t have to do that 
 

EDC4ALL! » 14 Oct 2024, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 3:22 pm

Link? Oh wait....you don't have a real one do you?

https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refu ... lum/asylum

Alert Type infoALERT: Court Order on Circumvention of Lawful Pathways Final RuleOn Aug. 3, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California’s order in East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Biden, 18-cv-06810 (N.D. Cal.), vacating the Circumvention of Lawful Pathways (CLP) rule. At this time and while the stay remains in place, USCIS will continue to apply the CLP rule.Under the rule, certain individuals who enter the United States through its southwest land border or adjacent coastal borders are presumed to be ineligible for asylum, unless they can demonstrate an exception to the rule or rebut the presumption. Individuals are encouraged to use lawful, safe, and orderly pathways to come to the United States.

They entered illegally. Period. But looney liberals don't care about the law.

You forgot one thing ........
you are communicating with a Lunatic .....who constantly makes up his own reality ...be damned the consequences .....

 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 14 Oct 2024, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 3:32 pm

They don’t have to do that

You seem to be some type of expert?

 

BooRadley » 14 Oct 2024, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 3:45 pm

You seem to be some type of expert?

 

 

No concern of yours. Get laid.
 

EDC4ALL! » 14 Oct 2024, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 3:22 pm

Link? Oh wait....you don't have a real one do you?

https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refu ... lum/asylum

Alert Type infoALERT: Court Order on Circumvention of Lawful Pathways Final RuleOn Aug. 3, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California’s order in East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Biden, 18-cv-06810 (N.D. Cal.), vacating the Circumvention of Lawful Pathways (CLP) rule. At this time and while the stay remains in place, USCIS will continue to apply the CLP rule.Under the rule, certain individuals who enter the United States through its southwest land border or adjacent coastal borders are presumed to be ineligible for asylum, unless they can demonstrate an exception to the rule or rebut the presumption. Individuals are encouraged to use lawful, safe, and orderly pathways to come to the United States.

They entered illegally. Period. But looney liberals don't care about the law.

Comprehension is not your strong point 
 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 14 Oct 2024, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 3:46 pm

No concern of yours. Get laid.

You show your ignorance every day ...

I see you moved from Jacksonville to Seattle?
 
Did your Mom and Dad finally throw you out?

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

Comprehension is not your strong point 
 

Eat **** you filthy lying bastard.

BooRadley » 14 Oct 2024, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 3:55 pm

You show your ignorance every day ...

I see you moved from Jacksonville to Seattle?
 
Did your Mom and Dad finally throw you out?

Grow up
Dumb **** my parents are dead.
you obsessed with me ****
like my new avatar ?
location updated as well.

**** are you familiar with Trust Fund?
 
 

murdock » 14 Oct 2024, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 4:04 pm

Eat **** you filthy lying bastard.

I changed my avatar.

 
 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 14 Oct 2024, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 1:03 pm

International Law that the USA participates in.

https://www.refworld.org/legal/agreemen ... 1/en/39821

READ IT GUMMY
THEY LEGAL

Nothing in that link requires the US to give them legal status.
However, they DO stipulate this:

Article 2
GENERAL OBLIGATIONS
Every refugee has duties to the country in which he finds himself, which
require in particular that he conform to its laws and regulations as well as to
measures taken for the maintenance of public order.

Get it, dickhead?
Beyond that, if someone claiming refugee status DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE LAWS OF THE US, they DO NOT QUALIFY!
That eliminates EVERY ILLEGAL who crossed the border illegally and did not immediately register at the border as a refugee IS NOT ELIGIBLE for refugee status.  It says NOTHING about requiring the US to grant them legal status at any time.

So unless you can show me where in that link the UN stipulates that potential refugees must be deemed legal, YOUR ARGUMENT IS FALSE!
 

Zeets2 » 14 Oct 2024, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 4:23 pm

Nothing in that link requires the US to give them legal status.
However, they DO stipulate this:

Get it, dickhead?
Beyond that, if someone claiming refugee status DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE LAWS OF THE US, they DO NOT QUALIFY!
That eliminates EVERY ILLEGAL who crossed the border illegally and did not immediately register at the border as a refugee IS NOT ELIGIBLE for refugee status.  It says NOTHING about requiring the US to grant them legal status at any time.

So unless you can show me where in that link the UN stipulates that potential refugees must be deemed legal, YOUR ARGUMENT IS FALSE!

Nope. Already been over this.
you as bad as @BooRadley  

 

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2024, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 1:57 pm

Prove I started it...

Your claim, your job.

Prove you didn't. 

Your claim, your job. 
 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 14 Oct 2024, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 3:32 pm

They don’t have to do that

https://www.lawfirm1.com/unlawful-entry ... below.What Is Unlawful Entry?Unlawful entry into the United States means that a person has entered the United States outside of immigration laws that allow legal entrance into the U.S. Unlawful entry is legally called improper entry.What Is Unlawful Presence?Unlawful presence is when a person stays in the United States after entering the U.S. unlawfully. There are two main ways to be in unlawful presence:

1. Overstaying your visa
2. Remaining in the U.S. after improper entry

Is Unlawful Entry a Felony?Yes, unlawful entry is a felony. And having a felony offense makes it extremely difficult to legally reenter the United States. A list of undocumented immigration civil offenses and violation consequences are listed below.


Everyone that entered ILLEGALLY before August 2023, when the liberal 9th put a TEMPORARY stay on overuling the CPL "RULE" (not law) is here ILLEGALLY. When it hits SCOTUS, it will be found unconstitutional and be eliminated. BYE BYE!

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 14 Oct 2024, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 12:21 pm

GUMMY

GO POUND SAND

Asylum seekers and refugees have rights that are outlined in human rights treaties and the Refugee Convention. These rights include: 

• Protection from deportation: Asylum seekers are protected from being returned to their home country. 
• Work authorization: Asylum seekers are allowed to work in the country they are seeking asylum in. 
• Education: Asylum seekers have access to education. 
• Health care: Asylum seekers have access to health care. 
• Housing: Asylum seekers have access to housing. 
• Freedom of religion: Asylum seekers have the right to freedom of religion. 
• Access to justice: Asylum seekers have access to justice. 
• Freedom of movement: Asylum seekers have the right to freedom of movement within the country they are seeking asylum in. 
• Identity and travel documents: Asylum seekers have the right to be issued civil, identity, and travel documents. 
• Social protection: Asylum seekers have access to social protection. 

 SCREAM GUMMY SCREAM

*Igor, got a link (not an opinion) IE, actual citation of the asylum law?

*pronounced eye-gore...

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 14 Oct 2024, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 4:08 pm

Grow up
Dumb **** my parents are dead.
you obsessed with me ****
like my new avatar ?
location updated as well.

**** are you familiar with Trust Fund?

So you moved across the country?

 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 14 Oct 2024, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 12:32 pm

oh we going to kill something all right...

that MAGA movement is going bye bye forever. 
Darkest chapter in American Politics.
Trump going to Leavenworth and Kamala and Time taking the USA forward

 

RebelGator » 14 Oct 2024, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2024, 12:33 pm

What did Biden bequeath you, hairy legs and sniff attacks?