Zeet,Zeets2 » 14 Oct 2024, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑ You demanded evidence?
Here you go, dickhead!
Nothing like checking out the facts before sticking your foot in your dumb mouth, is there?:
Ad always, ******* here didn't bother researching before he posts his ****. Here is the fact check. Read the real reason. It was about the dims trying to pull another dishonest **** tactic.JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 14 Oct 2024, 1:22 am » wrote: ↑ Full List of Republicans Who Voted Against FEMA Funding Before Helene Hit
THE QUESTIONDid 100 Republicans vote against funding FEMA?
THE ANSWER
The 100 Republicans named by Harris’ campaign voted against a budget bill to fund the entire federal government through Dec. 20, 2024. The bill did include continued funding for FEMA’s disaster relief fund.WHAT WE FOUNDOn Sept. 25, 2024, 100 Republican senators and representatives voted against a budget bill to continue funding the entire federal government, including FEMA’s disaster relief fund, through the end of 2024. A separate bill to give FEMA additional funding to respond to Hurricane Helene has yet to be put up for a vote.This type of temporary funding bill, known as a continuing resolution, is a short-term measure meant to prevent a government shutdown until Congress is able to agree on and pass an annual budget. The Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act keeps the government funded at current levels through Dec. 20, 2024.Division A, Sec. 134 of the act sets aside money for FEMA’s disaster relief fund, which pays for all of FEMA’s disaster response activities. This was one of many provisions in the bill, which covers funding for all aspects of the federal government.The bill passed the House by a 341-82 vote and passed the Senate by a 78-18 vote. All of the votes against the bill were Republicans.Many of the Republicans who voted against the bill voted for a different continuing resolution a week earlier. The bill they voted for had provisions of the SAVE Act, which would have required people to provide documentary proof of their citizenship when they register to vote. That bill failed to make it out of the House, and the bill that did later pass did not have those same provisions.https://www.kgw.com/article/news/verify ... ad4126f704
The bill was not only for FEMA funding. It also extended funding through Dec. 20 for programs including Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, military construction projects, veterans services and the National Flood Insurance Program.
Simple, dickhead!Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2024, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ Zeet,
Explain what POTUS has to do with mortgage rates....
*Huey » 14 Oct 2024, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑ The bill was not only for FEMA funding. It also extended funding through Dec. 20 for programs including Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, military construction projects, veterans services and the National Flood Insurance Program.
Some lawmakers opposed the stopgap funding bill for reasons unrelated to FEMA funding, and their public statements reflect that.
Republicans who opposed the bill criticized the process or federal spending broadly, or raised concerns about immigration. Here are a few examples:
Reich said, "Two weeks ago 100 GOP lawmakers voted against additional FEMA funding."Reich’s claim is partially accurate because Sept. 25, 18 Senate Republicans and 82 House Republicans voted against a stopgap funding bill to avert a government shutdown.
But his statement leaves out important details. The bill was a much broader funding bill that also included $20 billion for FEMA’s Disaster Relief Fund. Some Republicans said publicly that they opposed the bill for reasons unrelated to FEMA funding.A week earlier, a Republican majority voted for their own version of a stopgap funding bill that also included FEMA funding. Similar to Republicans voting against the Sept. 25 funding bill, more than 200 Democrats voted no.We rate this statement Half True.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 ... funding-b/
Was she in the country illegally like Obama's aunt.Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ JD Vance's mom was on Medicaid (as JD was ramping up his venture capital gig)....before she switched to Obamacare.
I bet he wishes he had never started this thread, he must feel like a 20-Mule Team fell in love with his butt hole.
Her son is a Venture Capitalist.....running for VP....whose boss insisted he would replace Obamacare with something yuger.
And you compare someone legally in this country on Obamacare to someone that's here illegally, ordered deported and ends up on welfare and food stamps?Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ JD Vance's mom was on Medicaid (as JD was ramping up his venture capital gig)....before she switched to Obamacare.
Link me to any glove laid on this OP...RebelGator » 14 Oct 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ I bet he wishes he had never started this thread, he must feel like a 20-Mule Team fell in love with his butt hole.
RebelGator » 14 Oct 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ I bet he wishes he had never started this thread, he must feel like a 20-Mule Team fell in love with his butt hole.
Yup.BooRadley » 14 Oct 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ And you compare someone legally in this country on Obamacare to someone that's here illegally, ordered deported and ends up on welfare and food stamps?
How can someone here illegally be on disability?
Zeet,Zeets2 » 14 Oct 2024, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ Simple, dickhead!
He's the one who caused BOTH inflation rates and interest rates to skyrocket with his wild spending on illegals, on the hoax of climate change, and on the useless war in Ukraine BECAUSE HE SPENT THE MONEY!
Or was your education in economics so poor that you don't understand the correlation between spending trillions of dollars so stupidly and raising debt to the highest point in US history that forces the country to borrow money to pay for it?
You're a self-linker, Bottom Boy.
:rofl:Vegas » 14 Oct 2024, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ Huey and I did. Scroll up you lazy steaming pile of dog ****.
And you're a ******..
second to dead last in the real world...brown...
"real world"....