Liberal Forum

righteous » 17 Oct 2024, 6:55 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2024, 6:55 pm

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2024, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2024, 1:45 pm

1) who was POTUS in 2008?

2) Undebunk your media comment.

3) Run from your Stupid.

why? you don't...
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2024, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2024, 5:04 pm

1) already answered, lying coward

2) you debunked it yourself.

1) Not without my help. I still don't think you know. 

2) You prove it i  every TDS OP. 

3) 0 - 2^^^

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2024, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2024, 5:04 pm

I am a loser. 

Do you want a chance to make it 1 - 2? 

No stakes, no judge. Just a deal that will give you a chance to win one. 

There is no opportunity for either of us to welch, because there will be nothing to welch on. 

Vegas » 18 Oct 2024, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 9:25 am

Do you want a chance to make it 1 - 2? 

No stakes, no judge. Just a deal that will give you a chance to win one. 

There is no opportunity for either of us to welch, because there will be nothing to welch on.

I want to see your example of Survivorship bias, and evidence that you're not a moron.

Vegas » 18 Oct 2024, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 9:20 am

1) Not without my help. I still don't think you know. 

2) You prove it i  every TDS OP. 

3) 0 - 2^^^

1) entirely without your "assistance"

2) Simple test...you'll evade

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 9:27 am

I want to see your example of Survivorship bias, and evidence that you're not a moron.

Your wants are not important. I don't see your admission anyway. 

If I am a moron, then you lost twice to one. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=47s

Vegas » 18 Oct 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 9:29 am

Your wants are not important. I don't see your admission anyway. 

If I am a moron, then you lost twice to one. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=47s

nothing in it for me..

 

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 9:29 am

1) entirely without your "assistance"

2) Simple test...you'll evade

1) Entirely with my assistance

2) Evade what? We are talking about your superb ability to prove my media comment. 

3) 0 - 2 ^^^

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 9:30 am

nothing in it for me..

What do you want? 

All I want is the pure joy of flaunting 0 - 3 to you. 

Vegas » 18 Oct 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 9:30 am

1) Entirely with my assistance

2) Evade what? We are talking about your superb ability to prove my media comment. 

3) 0 - 2 ^^^

1) your abject ignorance is conclusive evidence of the impossibility of any such occurrence.

2) This - "Whose media are the NYPost and Forbes?"

Now proceed to shoot yourself in the face with your next lie.

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 9:36 am

1) your abject ignorance is conclusive evidence of the impossibility of any such occurrence.

2) This - "Whose media are the NYPost and Forbes?"

Now proceed to shoot yourself in the face with your next lie.

1) Fancy talk. Now I know you are corned.     Give the definition without my help. NOW!

2) Oh look. He deflects to something else as a distraction. Not Veghead, he never does that. 

4 step evasion ^^^
      1.  Ask Veghead a question
      2. Veghead deflects from question with his own question. 
      3. Bring Veghead back to the original question. 
      4. Veghead accuses opponent of evading his question while evading the original question posed. 


3) 0 - 2 ^^^

Vegas » 18 Oct 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 9:40 am

1) Fancy talk. Now I know you are corned.     Give the definition without my help. NOW!

2) Oh look. He deflects to something else as a distraction. Not Veghead, he never does that. 

4 step evasion ^^^
      1.  Ask Veghead a question
      2. Veghead deflects from question with his own question. 
      3. Bring Veghead back to the original question. 
      4. Veghead accuses opponent of evading his question while evading the original question posed. 

3) 0 - 2 ^^^

1) QED

2) Always running. Forbes and the NYPost are media....whose media are they?



 

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 9:43 am

1) QED

2) Always running. Forbes and the NYPost are media....whose media are they?

1) Just what I thought. You can't define it. 

2) Continues the 4 step evasion. QED. More evasion. My media comment continues to be proved.

3) 0 -2 

1. 4 step will continue. 
 

Vegas » 18 Oct 2024, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 9:46 am

1) Just what I thought. You can't define it. 

2) Continues the 4 step evasion. QED. More evasion. My media comment continues to be proved.

3) 0 -2 

1. 4 step will continue.

1) did...in my own words. You can't offer an example - fact.

2) Fraud. Coward.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 9:43 am

I have to evade questions because I am a coward. 

You never answered my question, Darth Evader. Big surprise. I can't recall the last time you ever answered anything. 

What do you want to make this deal? A permanent ban for me, ok. No problem. 

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 9:49 am

1) did...in my own words. You can't offer an example - fact.

2) Fraud. Coward.

1) Not without my help. You haven't given your admission - fact

2) 4 step evasion

3) 0 - 2^^^

Vegas » 18 Oct 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 9:51 am

1) Not without my help. You haven't given your admission - fact

2) 4 step evasion

3) 0 - 2^^^

1) impossible....you can't even provide an example....because you're a moron.

2) your question was answered.....again, welsher...
 

JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 17 Oct 2024, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2024, 10:53 am

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-calls- ... 04110.html

It was definitely not a day of love, although I will have to admit that that part where Ashlii Babbitt played chicken with an armed LEO was pretty lovely!  

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 9:53 am

1) impossible....you can't even provide an example....because you're a moron.

2) your question was answered.....again, welsher...

1) Possible....you can't even give your admission, because you are a coward...If I am a moron, then you lost twice to one. 

2) The **** it was...lying coward. 

3) 0 - 2 ^^^