Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:11 pm

Post one.

Humbleness. 

Vegas » 18 Oct 2024, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:12 pm

Humbleness.

You're a **** idiot.

If I can define it, in my own words, why would I admit to not understanding it?



 

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:15 pm

You're a **** idiot.

If I can define it, in my own words, why would I admit to not understanding it?

Yet you cant

FJB » 18 Oct 2024, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:15 pm

Yet you cant

I have.

You haven't.

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:15 pm

You're a **** idiot.

If I can define it, in my own words, why would I admit to not understanding it?

Three reasons: 
1. It took you almost 3 years to get around to it
2. Your first definition was a copy/paste. You put up a fit when told to do it in your own words. 
3. I had to help you. 

I still don't believe that you know. 
 

Vegas » 18 Oct 2024, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:17 pm

Three reasons: 
1. It took you almost 3 years to get around to it
2. Your first definition was a copy/paste. You put up a fit when told to do it in your own words. 
3. I had to help you. 

I still don't believe that you know.

1) you're lying
2) to demonstrate how **** stupid you were for suggesting it applied to the survey.
3) you can't even post an example.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:20 pm

1) you're lying
2) to demonstrate how **** stupid you were for suggesting it applied to the survey.
3) you can't even post an example.

1) You are lying by saying I am lying. 
2)  I laughed my *** off when you said it had to do with dead presidents. It was only until much later that you finally figured out how stupid you were. 
3) You can't even give an admission. 

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:16 pm

I have.

You haven't.

No you haven't 

FJB » 18 Oct 2024, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:23 pm

No you haven't

 

Son, you need to get back into the retarded kids sandbox!
Wait!They don't want you there! You failed your third grade GED again!      
@FJB  
 

Beakman » 18 Oct 2024, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:31 pm

Son, you need to get back into the retarded kids sandbox!
Wait!They don't want you there! You failed your third grade GED again!      
@FJB

**** you bitch boy

FJB » 18 Oct 2024, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:23 pm

No you haven't

Have you?

Vegas » 18 Oct 2024, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:22 pm

1) You are lying by saying I am lying. 
2)  I laughed my *** off when you said it had to do with dead presidents. It was only until much later that you finally figured out how stupid you were. 
3) You can't even give an admission.

 

I laughed my *** off when you said it had to do with dead presidents

No, I didn't.

I posited it as the only reason YOU would confuse it with the bias you actually intended.

The funniest part of the whole thing was you presuming to tell your correspondent that it was too complicated for you to explain.

Nod. You know it is true.

**** moron.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:38 pm

Have you?

Not until you do...keep deflecting shilly

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:41 pm

No, I didn't.

 

Yes, you did. 

I posited it as the only reason YOU would confuse it with the bias you actually intended.

     Nice retelling. Nope. You came back with the dumbest **** about it. I was explaining your fallacy, and you replied about dead presidents. 

The funniest part of the whole thong was ypu presuming to tell your correspondent that it was too complicated for you to explain.

Another lie. I said I couldn't recall the exact details. Why is lying so important to you? 

Nod. You know it is true.

Nod, you know you are full of ****. 

**** moron.

So you are going to continue to fall for this. Ok. If I am a moron, then you lost twice to one. 

Vegas » 18 Oct 2024, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:45 pm

Yes, you did. 

     Nice retelling. Nope. You came back with the dumbest **** about it. I was explaining your fallacy, and you replied about dead presidents. 

Another lie. I said I couldn't recall the exact details. Why is lying so important to you? 

Nod, you know you are full of ****. 

So you are going to continue to fall for this. Ok. If I am a moron, then you lost twice to one.

I was explaining your fallacy, and you replied about dead presidents. 

A) it's not me, it's the survey...

**** cretin

B) to which "fallacy" did you suggest it is subject?

Lying coward.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:49 pm

A) it's not me, it's the survey...

 

Your interpretation of the survey was laughable to the point that I had no choice but to demoralize you for 3 years. 
You still don't know what survivorship bias is, due to your ignorance. 

**** cretin

If I am a cretin, then you lost twice to one. 

B) to which "fallacy" did you suggest it is subject?

Oh for God sakes. Why do you insist on asking such dumb questions. Take a wild **** guess Askholio. God man.

Lying coward.

Projecting. 

Vegas » 18 Oct 2024, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:52 pm

Your interpretation of the survey was laughable to the point that I had no choice but to demoralize you for 3 years. 
You still don't know what survivorship bias is, due to your ignorance. 

If I am a cretin, then you lost twice to one. 

Oh for God sakes. Why do you insist on asking such dumb questions. Take a wild **** guess Askholio. God man.

Projecting.

Your interpretation of the survey was laughable

it's an ordinal ranking, **** idiot..

There's #8, and there's "worse than Buchanan"

You still don't know what survivorship bias is, due to your ignorance. 

But we have my definition, in my words...we only have evidence that you have no idea what it is.

Oh for God sakes. Why do you insist on asking such dumb questions.

Answer, coward.

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 1:57 pm

it's an ordinal ranking, **** idiot..

There's #8, and there's "worse than Buchanan"

 

You thought survivorship bias had to do with dead presidents. 

But we have my definition, in my words...we only have evidence that you have no idea what it is.
 

I helped you. I had to guide you to it. You still don't know. 

Answer, coward.

Where is your admission?

Vegas » 18 Oct 2024, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 2:02 pm

You thought survivorship bias had to do with dead presidents. 

I helped you. I had to guide you to it. You still don't know. 

Where is your admission?

You keep repeating the same lies.

This is done in a heartbeat

B) to which "fallacy" did you suggest it is subject?

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2024, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2024, 2:04 pm

You keep repeating the same lies.

This is done in a heartbeat

B) to which "fallacy" did you suggest it is subject?

define a "woman"