Why don't you try to make your point with data?*Beekeeper » 22 Oct 2024, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ So your "fiscal year" rules don't apply when you are discussing DEMOCRATS SPENDING, huh?? That only carries over if a REPUBLICAN takes office, but not the DEMOCRAT PIECE OF ****!!
Got it.
Maybe a video will help...
Can I try?
Help what?BooRadley » 22 Oct 2024, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Maybe a video will help...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kuTG19Cu_Q
That's easy, Covid and the spendthrift democrats...Blackvegetable » 22 Oct 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ So let's re-examine your "math"...
In 2000, the federal budget was in surplus.....and there was very serious discussion that the debt held by the public (3.34 trillion in q3 FY2001) might be eliminated in 10 years.
Your two votes for Scrub enabled a fiscal swing of more than 16 trillion over 8 years.....to the bad.
Then Obama cuts the deficit he inherited by 50% in his first term, and you vote for the other guy, promising tax cuts, in 2012. In his 8 years, spending rose at the lowest rate since Eisenhower. So in 2016, you voted for the Supply Side Huckster.....whose record FY 2021 deficit you blame on Biden.
Yea....you Da Man.
Stop yammering and show me where you believe I have been inconsistent..*Beekeeper » 23 Oct 2024, 5:44 am » wrote: ↑ YOU were the one screeching about "fiscal year" on another post about deficits. So why does it NOT APPLY here??
Oh wait, let me guess. BECAUSE IT MAKES DEMOCRATS LOOK BAD WHEN YOU DO, RIGHT DICKFACE!!
GO **** YOURSELF!! YOU'RE LOSING ALREADY and it's barely morning.
Blackvegetable » 23 Oct 2024, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑ Stop yammering and show me where you believe I have been inconsistent..
Preferably using my words and math.
Blackvegetable » 23 Oct 2024, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑ Stop yammering and show me where you believe I have been inconsistent..
Preferably using my words and math.
Watch this folks ....Blackvegetable » 20 Oct 2024, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ You just "blamed" 2021 on Biden, Hole...
Think about how **** stupified on FOX you would have to be.
Watch this folks ....Blackvegetable » 23 Oct 2024, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑ Stop yammering and show me where you believe I have been inconsistent..
Preferably using my words and math.
Blackvegetable » 19 Oct 2024, 10:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Now if you only understood the fiscal calendar.
That you don't makes you usefool.
That is because the OP failed to account for it....as I explained.*Beekeeper » 23 Oct 2024, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑ Oops!!
Sucks it was TOO EASY TO FIND, HUH, dickbreath??
Damn, that CURB STOMPING is gonna hurt.
Yep.Fuelman » 23 Oct 2024, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑![]()
just **** priceless!
"Roughly 77 percent of President Trump’s approved ten-year debt came from bipartisan legislation, and 29 percent of the net ten-year debt President Biden has approved thus far came from bipartisan legislation. The rest was from partisan actions."
This is what you idiots do all the time.Majik » 23 Oct 2024, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑ Watch this folks ....
how many years in the last 20 were Democrats in control of the power of the purse?
Huh?
My facts v. Your conjectures.Majik » 23 Oct 2024, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑ Yep.
While BV also claims that The Dems are the party of the Middle class while having 81 billionaires back Kamala.
And who knows how many foreign billionaires that have illegally donated through their ActBlue pac....which is now under investigation ...
Who was in control of the Purse the last 20 years ?Blackvegetable » 23 Oct 2024, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑ This is what you idiots do all the time.
You blame Democratic administrations for the federal debt and democrats in congress for deficits.
Do you know what a "structural deficit" is?Majik » 23 Oct 2024, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ Who was in control of the Purse the last 20 years ?
now ...
It's basic math .....
Subtract Trump's 4 years of debt from the last 20 ....
what's the remainder ?
huh?
What conjecture?