Liberal Forum

ROG62 » 21 Oct 2024, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 9:16 am

Who reports it is irrelevant...the data comes from a non political group...

**** .. it comes from a known liar


A Republican-led Assembly panel took testimony Wednesday from a felon convicted of mail and bank fraud who is now conducting his own investigation of the 2020 election.Peter Bernegger, a New London resident who was convicted on fraud charges in 2009 and served prison time, has been conducting his review using a combination of state voter lists and local election data. He claimed to state lawmakers that thousands of “fake voters” cast ballots in Wisconsin, but he declined repeated requests to show his evidence.The 2020 election has already been heavily scrutinized in Wisconsin, a state where President Joe Biden defeated former President Donald Trump by 20,682 votes. Biden’s victory was affirmed by a partial recount as well as multiple state and federal court decisions, and a review by the nonpartisan Legislative Audit Bureau found no evidence of widespread fraud.
 

https://www.wpr.org/politics/republican ... ion-review


 
 

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 9:26 am

Poor Veghead. With all of this new evidence coming out, he still can't admit that I was right about 2020 being rigged. 

1. "What evidence?"  Jesus dude. Just stop .

Exactly zero evidence.

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2024, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:06 am

Exactly zero evidence.

OP and the many other OPs. But they were more than 5 words, so it makes sense that it was too long for you. 
 

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:16 am

OP and the many other OPs. But they were more than 5 words, so it makes sense that it was too long for you.

OP is ****

Mrkelly » 21 Oct 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:16 am

OP is ****

No evidence that it's ****. 

Next. 

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:18 am

No evidence that it's ****. 

Next.

A Republican-led Assembly panel took testimony Wednesday from a felon convicted of mail and bank fraud who is now conducting his own investigation of the 2020 election.Peter Bernegger, a New London resident who was convicted on fraud charges in 2009 and served prison time, has been conducting his review using a combination of state voter lists and local election data. He claimed to state lawmakers that thousands of “fake voters” cast ballots in Wisconsin, but he declined repeated requests to show his evidence.The 2020 election has already been heavily scrutinized in Wisconsin, a state where President Joe Biden defeated former President Donald Trump by 20,682 votes. Biden’s victory was affirmed by a partial recount as well as multiple state and federal court decisions, and a review by the nonpartisan Legislative Audit Bureau found no evidence of widespread fraud.

Mrkelly » 21 Oct 2024, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:19 am

A Republican-led Assembly panel took testimony Wednesday from a felon convicted of mail and bank fraud who is now conducting his own investigation of the 2020 election.Peter Bernegger, a New London resident who was convicted on fraud charges in 2009 and served prison time, has been conducting his review using a combination of state voter lists and local election data. He claimed to state lawmakers that thousands of “fake voters” cast ballots in Wisconsin, but he declined repeated requests to show his evidence.The 2020 election has already been heavily scrutinized in Wisconsin, a state where President Joe Biden defeated former President Donald Trump by 20,682 votes. Biden’s victory was affirmed by a partial recount as well as multiple state and federal court decisions, and a review by the nonpartisan Legislative Audit Bureau found no evidence of widespread fraud.

Not related. 

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:20 am

Not related.

he just says ****

and has zero proof 

and he is a proven liar

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:16 am

OP and the many other OPs. But they were more than 5 words, so it makes sense that it was too long for you.

Zero evidence..


 

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2024, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:23 am

Zero evidence..

Ops are the evidence, with the numbers. Your illiteracy is not my problem. 

Mrkelly » 21 Oct 2024, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:22 am

he just says ****

and has zero proof 

and he is a proven liar

**** ^^^. The numbers are there. Period. 
 

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:26 am

**** ^^^. The numbers are there. Period.

number he made up without ANY evidence 

unless you have the proof?

Mrkelly » 21 Oct 2024, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:30 am

number he made up without ANY evidence 

unless you have the proof?

No evidence that they were made up. 

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:30 am

No evidence that they were made up.

                         

Mrkelly » 21 Oct 2024, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:31 am

                       

                         

I win again. 

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:32 am

                         

I win again.

You’re a big proof guy on here

go to that link and site ANY evidence he produced   

then google his name and look at all the times he has been called out for having NO EVIDENCE   

  tRumpers
 

Mrkelly » 21 Oct 2024, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:22 am

he just says ****

and has zero proof 

and he is a proven liar

Proven by who, a New York Court stuffed with Democrats?

Haven't you seen enough of New York justice to know its a pile of ****?
 

Mrkelly » 21 Oct 2024, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:44 am

You’re a big proof guy on here

go to that link and site ANY evidence he produced   

then google his name and look at all the times he has been called out for having NO EVIDENCE   

  tRumpers

You never gave a link. Just a paragraph of some ****. So no, I won't take you seriously. 

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:54 am

You never gave a link. Just a paragraph of some ****. So no, I won't take you seriously.

  I’m talking about the OP

you know … the one with the proof   

Mrkelly » 21 Oct 2024, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 10:57 am

  I’m talking about the OP

you know … the one with the proof 

You gave me a paragraph about how it was all fake. You didn't give a link. So it could have came from CNN for all I know. They are useless.