It's OK if you want to lie to yourself..just don't try lying to me.....https://www.latimes.com/california/stor ... rificationMrkelly » 21 Oct 2024, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑ and none of that matters
I used to work the polls
a ballot has to be confirmed in order to be counted
you guys act like republican poll workers are **** idiots
and every republican politician has turned a blind eye to every republican election officials concerns
this is just another distraction to keep us from wanting answers to real problems
but do carry on
Agreed....MurriQUEER is a WRECK.

GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Oct 2024, 7:56 pm » wrote: ↑ It's OK if you want to lie to yourself..just don't try lying to me.....https://www.latimes.com/california/stor ... rification
that article was about too many signatures being rejected funny how they expect election volunteers to become handwriting experts with 5 minutes training...GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Oct 2024, 7:56 pm » wrote: ↑ It's OK if you want to lie to yourself..just don't try lying to me.....https://www.latimes.com/california/stor ... rification
The 30,000 bogus ballots was made public information too soon.ROG62 » 22 Oct 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑ funny how they expect election volunteers to become handwriting experts with 5 minutes training...
Mrkelly » 22 Oct 2024, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑that article was about too many signatures being rejected
so which is it
too many people used fake signatures
or too many got caught?
Rejected mail-in ballots have been a significant factor in recent elections. This year a New York congresswoman won a primary by 3,200 votes, a margin smaller than the number of mail-in ballots disqualified in that election. In 2018 in Florida, the number of mail ballots tossed was greater than the 10,033 votes that secured one candidate a U.S. Senate seat.
They'll be monitoring thru the election process...GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Oct 2024, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ The 30,000 bogus ballots was made public information too soon.
They might as well have kept the list secret, then after the election audit the **** out of the names on that list.
GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Oct 2024, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ If your agenda is to CHEAT...then the article points out how easy that is.
In your case YOUR agenda is to discredit the notion that signature verification makes it very easy for agenda driven *** to cheat, especially after all of the Elderly White Ballot Watchers have been sent home.
If your agenda is to CHEAT...then the article points out how easy that is.Mrkelly » 22 Oct 2024, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑the white people were told to go home
and they said “YES MASSA”
GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Oct 2024, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ If your agenda is to CHEAT...then the article points out how easy that is.
In your case YOUR agenda is to discredit the notion that signature verification makes it very easy for agenda driven *** to cheat, especially after all of the Elderly White Ballot Watchers have been sent home.
If your agenda is to CHEAT...then the article points out how easy that is.
GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Oct 2024, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ If your agenda is to CHEAT...then the article points out how easy that is.
In your case YOUR agenda is to discredit the notion that signature verification makes it very easy for agenda driven *** to cheat, especially after all of the Elderly White Ballot Watchers have been sent home.
GO HOME BOYIf your agenda is to CHEAT...then the article points out how easy that is.Mrkelly » 22 Oct 2024, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑GO HOME BOY
[img]blob:d1bfdcbd-65b3-484b-a587-211df4df46d8[/img]
https://migrationmuseum.org/wp-content/ ... 063433.jpg
GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Oct 2024, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ If your agenda is to CHEAT...then the article points out how easy that is.
In your case YOUR agenda is to discredit the notion that signature verification makes it very easy for agenda driven *** to cheat, especially after all of the Elderly White Ballot Watchers have been sent home.
yes sir boss ima goin homeGHETTO go full retard when he get triggeredMrkelly » 22 Oct 2024, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑yes sir boss ima goin home
[img]blob:5286be35-fca4-4fff-a61d-73d30ebf3f27[/img]
https://i.pinimg.com/236x/17/8d/d9/178d ... 0ac6b8.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/tCv7p4ZJ/200w.gifGHETTOBLASTER » 22 Oct 2024, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ If your agenda is to CHEAT...then the article points out how easy that is.
In your case YOUR agenda is to discredit the notion that signature verification makes it very easy for agenda driven *** to cheat, especially after all of the Elderly White Ballot Watchers have been sent home.
GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Oct 2024, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ If your agenda is to CHEAT...then the article points out how easy that is.
In your case YOUR agenda is to discredit the notion that signature verification makes it very easy for agenda driven *** to cheat, especially after all of the Elderly White Ballot Watchers have been sent home.
maineman » 22 Oct 2024, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑ I'm curious:
Is anyone suggesting that "ballot requests" are synonymous with "ballots"?