There's no way you could have answered that.....but I expected a response like you provided and arrived at the answer you wouldn't articulate.maineman » 23 Oct 2024, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Joe Biden is not on the ballot for my granddaughter's babysitter list, and he is not on the ballot for President. Donald Trump is.
What are the next 3 words, *******. Or did you just stop reading there?maineman » 23 Oct 2024, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑ "was I molested?" is a question that she asked... but it was separated from any mention of her father by mentions of the Woolzack's house, by being sexualized by Caroline and by having sex with friends at a young age. I guess you missed that in the bowl of word soup, poor goof ball.
"I think so"golfboy » 23 Oct 2024, 6:27 pm » wrote: ↑ What are the next 3 words, *******. Or did you just stop reading there?
No nothing about the inappropriate showers with your hero, Pedo Peter?
RebelGator » 23 Oct 2024, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑ There's no way you could have answered that.....but I expected a response like you provided and arrived at the answer you wouldn't articulate.
but separated by random thoughts about The Woolzacks and Christine and sex with other friends.golfboy » 23 Oct 2024, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑ No nothing about the inappropriate showers with your hero, Pedo Peter?
What does the statement about her father showering with her, have to do with ANYTHING else?maineman » 23 Oct 2024, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑ but separated by random thoughts about The Woolzacks and Christine and sex with other friends.
Word soup?
goofball?
golfboy » 23 Oct 2024, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑ What does the statement about her father showering with her, have to do with ANYTHING else?
Why are you still defending Pedo Peter?
Is it some kind of Pedo-ring requirement?
What does "inappropriate" mean in liberaland? *******.maineman » 23 Oct 2024, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑ showering is not synonymous with sexually molesting. How **** dumb are you, goofball?
It does to anyone who's not a pedophile.
**** your demands.
Vegas » 24 Oct 2024, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ **** your demands.
They aren't my calculations. The point was that I was using level 3 for the definition whereas you want level 1. **** that noise.
**** idiot.The point was that I was using level 3 for the definition whereas you want level 1.
Blackvegetable » 24 Oct 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ **** idiot.
If it aborts at Level 0.17, it can never reach Level 3.
"Net" of what?
Yeah, we know. ^^^
Level 3 isn't something you can assert.
Which is why I didn't assert it. I simply said understanding it is at level 3.
Then demonstrate it.