Liberal Forum

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 11:47 am

It was defined in the post. As always, you didn't **** read it. You never do. That is another reason why you lost. 

**** your games. You lost.

Post it.


We've only just begun.

 

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2024, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 11:49 am

Post it.

We've only just begun.

BV the chink cocksucker always loses

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2024, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 11:49 am

Post it.

We've only just begun.

You want me to post what you refused to read. Your laziness will cost you. 

So what's in it for me? I am not going to reward your laziness with a free ride. 

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2024, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 11:49 am

Post it.

We've only just begun.

We have finished. You decided to play games and hide. Now you turn around and want a do over? Doesn't work that way. 

You had your chance. 

0- 3 ^^^

Now let's complete 0 - 4. 

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 11:54 am

You want me to post what you refused to read. Your laziness will cost you. 

So what's in it for me? I am not going to reward your laziness with a free ride.

Don't and accept that #1 is now aborted.

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2024, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 11:56 am

Don't and accept that #1 is now aborted.

Yeah. You lost. That's what happens when you refuse to read. 

Let's now move to your next beating.

And go!


2. INflation: 
Targeted Data Focus: In short, the senile Pedo and the Ho didn't account for the people who were effected the most like the lower middle class to low income earners. The industry prices that they struggle with were not included in their numbers. Only the entities whose prices decreased were counted. Inflation rates are usually measured through aggregate indices such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI), but inflation can vary widely across different sectors. While overall inflation may have decreased, certain essentials, such as housing, food, and healthcare, still experienced higher-than-average price increases. This uneven inflation impact disproportionately affects the middle class and lower-income households. By focusing on overall inflation without focusing on these variations, the statistic can overlook the "survival" of the people or sectors still struggling...which is most of America. 

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 11:55 am

We have finished. You decided to play games and hide. Now you turn around and want a do over? Doesn't work that way. 

You had your chance. 

0- 3 ^^^

Now let's complete 0 - 4.

I tore apart #1, from which you've run.

You'll do the same for #2....because you've never had an intelligent thought.
 

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 11:57 am

Yeah. You lost. That's what happens when you refuse to read. 

Let's now move to your next beating.

And go!

2. INflation: 
Targeted Data Focus: In short, the senile Pedo and the Ho didn't account for the people who were effected the most like the lower middle class to low income earners. The industry prices that they struggle with were not included in their numbers. Only the entities whose prices decreased were counted. Inflation rates are usually measured through aggregate indices such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI), but inflation can vary widely across different sectors. While overall inflation may have decreased, certain essentials, such as housing, food, and healthcare, still experienced higher-than-average price increases. This uneven inflation impact disproportionately affects the middle class and lower-income households. By focusing on overall inflation without focusing on these variations, the statistic can overlook the "survival" of the people or sectors still struggling...which is most of America.

It lies aborted around your ankles.

You have no idea whatsoever what Survivorship bias is.

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2024, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 11:58 am

I tore apart #1, from which you've run.

You'll do the same for #2....because you've never had an intelligent thought.

       Uh ohhhhh. Blatant and obvious projection. Mary is in the house. 0 - 3^^^

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 11:59 am

It lies aborted around your ankles.

You have no idea whatsoever what Survivorship bias is.

     Damn. I thought that you would at least make an effort. I'll take that as a forfeit. 0 - 4 ^^^

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 12:00 pm

     Damn. I thought that you would at least make an effort. I'll take that as a forfeit. 0 - 4 ^^^

When you acknowledge that #1 lies aborted and abandoned, we'll move on to #2.

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2024, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 12:12 pm

When you acknowledge that #1 lies aborted and abandoned, we'll move on to #2.

LOL. Nice try. 

You lost number 1 and you forfeited number 2. Thus, 0 - 4. 

You don't get do overs. You should have stuck your usual tactics up your ***. 

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 12:14 pm

LOL. Nice try. 

You lost number 1 and you forfeited number 2. Thus, 0 - 4. 

You don't get do overs. You should have stuck your usual tactics up your ***.

Then post your definition of "net job creation".

**** idiot.

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2024, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 12:16 pm

Then post your definition of "net job creation".

**** idiot.

It was in the post that you didn't read. 

Thus, it was already posted. Your laziness is not my **** problem. 


And no, I am not going to repost it. Scroll back and read it. Moron. 

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2024, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 12:16 pm

I am now 0 - 4. I need to beg Vegas for another chance. 

Ok fine. ^^^

I will give you a do over for number 2. Just remember, you not reading the post is your problem, not mine. 

Ready? 

Does anyone else find @Vegas 's obsession with "keeping score" as juvenile and asinine as I do?  
 
 

maineman » 21 Oct 2024, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 12:24 pm

Does anyone else find @Vegas 's obsession with "keeping score" as juvenile and asinine as I do?

      I bet if he was kicking my ***, then you would love the scorekeeping. 

MM displays his double standard again. 

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 12:29 pm

      I bet if he was kicking my ***, then you would love the scorekeeping. 

MM displays his double standard again.

****.  I never bother to "keep score".  Doing so on an internet message board is stupid.  The person "keeping score" invariably unilaterally declares himself the winner.  It's like a gymnast giving himself a perfect ten for a routine performed in an empty gymnasium.

maineman » 21 Oct 2024, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 12:32 pm

****.  I never bother to "keep score".  Doing so on an internet message board is stupid.  The person "keeping score" invariably unilaterally declares himself the winner.  It's like a gymnast giving himself a perfect ten for a routine performed in an empty gymnasium.

Please. If I was getting my *** beat like this, then you would love it. 

Take your hypocrisy and shove it all the way up your ***. Elbow deep. 

Vegas » 21 Oct 2024, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2024, 12:18 pm

It was in the post that you didn't read. 

Thus, it was already posted. Your laziness is not my **** problem. 

And no, I am not going to repost it. Scroll back and read it. Moron.

no, it wasn't.