Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
"She's Gonna Continue This??? Is She Cray???"
"She's Gonna Continue This??? Is She Cray???"
By Blackvegetable
26 Oct 2024 6:30 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
31 Oct 2024 7:36 pm
They can. Seeing how that SUPREMACY CLAUSE dictates that the STATE'S ANYTHING that has a corresponding FEDERAL LAW is supreme to any STATE LAW!!GHETTOBLASTER » 31 Oct 2024, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Bee Keeper just stated that the Federal government can dictate to the States the dollar amount that their individual Low Income Programs shall be...
Here you go.....
https://kairoscenter.org/explaining-the-140-million/
"THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN POOR AND LOW INCOME
Although a broader and preferred measure, the SPM poverty threshold still remains an incomplete estimate of poverty. For instance, according to the SPM, a four-person household with an income of $30,000 is not poor because they fall above the designated poverty threshold. This means that many households living just above the poverty threshold aren’t counted as poor, even though they will have a hard time meeting their basic needs."
Instead, the population living between 100-199% of the poverty threshold is sometimes defined as “low-income.”
Article VI, Clause 2:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
Sucks you have NO CONCEPT what the Constitution actually says, huh, COCKBREATH???
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
31 Oct 2024 8:41 pm
SHOW ME THE FEDERAL LAW THAT DICTATES WHAT THE LOW INCOME VOTER THRESH HOLD SHALL BE...!!!!*Beekeeper » 31 Oct 2024, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑ They can. Seeing how that SUPREMACY CLAUSE dictates that the STATE'S ANYTHING that has a corresponding FEDERAL LAW is supreme to any STATE LAW!!
Article VI, Clause 2:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
Sucks you have NO CONCEPT what the Constitution actually says, huh, COCKBREATH???
SHOW ME THAT ACT OF CONGRESS...!!!
https://www.medicaidplanningassistance. ... uidelines/
YOU DON'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE IS BETWEEN A FEDERAL LAW AND A GUIDELINE...!!!!
https://www.ncontracts.com/nsight-blog/ ... rification
“Supervisory guidance does not have the force and effect of law, and the agencies do not take enforcement actions based on supervisory guidance,”
YOU KEEP MAKING YOURSELF LOOK SO TOTALLY **** STUPID...KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK YOU CLUELESS IDIOT...!!!""[b/]
1 Nov 2024 6:56 am
The poverty guidelines may be formally referenced as “the poverty guidelines updated periodically in the Federal Register by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the authority of 42 U.S.C. 9902(2).”GHETTOBLASTER » 31 Oct 2024, 8:41 pm » wrote: ↑ SHOW ME THE FEDERAL LAW THAT DICTATES WHAT THE LOW INCOME VOTER THRESH HOLD SHALL BE...!!!!
SHOW ME THAT ACT OF CONGRESS...!!!
https://www.medicaidplanningassistance. ... uidelines/
YOU DON'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE IS BETWEEN A FEDERAL LAW AND A GUIDELINE...!!!!
https://www.ncontracts.com/nsight-blog/ ... rification
“Supervisory guidance does not have the force and effect of law, and the agencies do not take enforcement actions based on supervisory guidance,”
YOU KEEP MAKING YOURSELF LOOK SO TOTALLY **** STUPID...KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK YOU CLUELESS IDIOT...!!!""[b/]
Now, DICKWEED, WHO LOOKS **** STUPID???
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
1 Nov 2024 8:07 am
34 pages?GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Oct 2024, 5:49 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.poorpeoplescampaign.org/wp- ... Report.pdf
• In the 2020 elections, LIV exceeded 20% of the total voting population in 45 states and Washington D.C. In tight battleground states, LIV accounted for an even greater share of the voting population, including in states that flipped party outcomes from 2016 to 2020. • Where the margin of victory was near or less than 3%, LIV accounted for 34% to 45% of the voting population: Arizona (39.96%), Georgia (37.84%), Michigan (37.81%), Nevada (35.78%), North Carolina (43.67%), Pennsylvania (34.12%), and Wisconsin (39.80%). • A closer look at the racial demographics of LIV in nine battleground states (Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas and Wisconsin) shows that white LIV accounted for a higher vote share than all other racial groupings of LIV combined. This underscores the necessity of organizing low-income white, Black, and Hispanic voters together in multi-racial political coalitions.
1 Nov 2024 8:37 am
It's a BOGUS "study" done by some LWNJ group that uses INVENTED NUMBERS to define a "low-income voter".
ANYTHING these LWNJs do, you have to inspect since they have predetermined outcomes and will do anything they can to get the result they want. God only knows how many times they ran the income levels until they got the results they wanted. What they ALSO know is that these lemmings of theirs will NEVER question the validity of what they produce since Pavlov knew how to make his dogs salivate like these LWNJ groups do for their minions and lemmings.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
1 Nov 2024 9:33 am
According to HUD, a low income in Denver, Colorado is considered to be a household earning less than a certain percentage of the area's median income, with the current "low income" range for a single person household in Denver being around $66,300 per year.
Key points about HUD's low income definition in Denver:
Based on Area Median Income (AMI):
HUD uses the area median income to determine low income levels, meaning the definition varies based on the local housing market.
Key points about HUD's low income definition in Denver:
Based on Area Median Income (AMI):
HUD uses the area median income to determine low income levels, meaning the definition varies based on the local housing market.
1 Nov 2024 10:56 am
Every time I prove your last premise IS FULL OF ****...you keep changing your story...!!!!*Beekeeper » 01 Nov 2024, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑ The poverty guidelines may be formally referenced as “the poverty guidelines updated periodically in the Federal Register by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the authority of 42 U.S.C. 9902(2).”
Now, DICKWEED, WHO LOOKS **** STUPID???
First you said that anyone who uses their own thresholds for determining what "LOW INCOME" is...is BREAKING THE LAW OF THE LAND....
I had to show you proof that you were full of **** them and now in desperation you have bounced back to showing me the POVERTY guideline for receiving community services.....which is NOT THE SAME AS LOW INCOME.
You are either too stupid to understand that your example is "apples to oranges" or else you are so desperate to prove me wrong that YOU NEED TO BACK YOUR FAILED ARGUMENT WITH EXAMPLES THAT YOU KNOW ARE NOT ON POINT
1 Nov 2024 3:31 pm
GHETTOBLASTER » 01 Nov 2024, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ Every time I prove your last premise IS FULL OF ****...you keep changing your story...!!!!
First you said that anyone who uses their own thresholds for determining what "LOW INCOME" is...is BREAKING THE LAW OF THE LAND....
I had to show you proof that you were full of **** them and now in desperation you have bounced back to showing me the POVERTY guideline for receiving community services.....which is NOT THE SAME AS LOW INCOME.
You are either too stupid to understand that your example is "apples to oranges" or else you are so desperate to prove me wrong that YOU NEED TO BACK YOUR FAILED ARGUMENT WITH EXAMPLES THAT YOU KNOW ARE NOT ON POINT
Never said that, DICKFACE CUMGUZZLER!! I SAID that using anything BUT the Federal Standard has an INVALID STUDY by using a number that allows them to obtain a PREDETERMINED RESULT!!First you said that anyone who uses their own thresholds for determining what "LOW INCOME" is...is BREAKING THE LAW OF THE LAND....
Nice try to deflect from the MASSIVE CURB STOMPING you've been getting.
And the APPLES TO ORANGES "thingy" is what YOU HAVE in your little **** "study" where they MANIPULATED THE DEFINITION OF LOW INCOME to get the OUTCOME they wanted!!
Sucks, huh?
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
1 Nov 2024 3:39 pm
Cray is the name given to a super computer.
https://images.app.goo.gl/UVV8epuTP5rrKAy7A
1 Nov 2024 3:55 pm
Still don't know what the difference is between POVERTY LEVEL and LOW INCOME...?*Beekeeper » 01 Nov 2024, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Never said that, DICKFACE CUMGUZZLER!! I SAID that using anything BUT the Federal Standard has an INVALID STUDY by using a number that allows them to obtain a PREDETERMINED RESULT!!
Nice try to deflect from the MASSIVE CURB STOMPING you've been getting.
And the APPLES TO ORANGES "thingy" is what YOU HAVE in your little **** "study" where they MANIPULATED THE DEFINITION OF LOW INCOME to get the OUTCOME they wanted!!
Sucks, huh?
Notice that in your replies you try to make those two very different income groups the same thing.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING DUMB ****
I already showed you many examples of how LOW INCOME STATUS is considered by the states and counties to be as high as $60,000 and your "rebuttal" was to say that only the Federal Government's Department of Weights and Measures has the authority to say what the POVERTY LEVEL can be...
You look so incredibly stupid right now ..but please keep adding to your legacy here as an ILL INFORMED CLOWN .
1 Nov 2024 6:20 pm
GHETTOBLASTER » 01 Nov 2024, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Still don't know what the difference is between POVERTY LEVEL and LOW INCOME...?
Notice that in your replies you try to make those two very different income groups the same thing.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING DUMB ****
I already showed you many examples of how LOW INCOME STATUS is considered by the states and counties to be as high as $60,000 and your "rebuttal" was to say that only the Federal Government's Department of Weights and Measures has the authority to say what the POVERTY LEVEL can be...
You look so incredibly stupid right now ..but please keep adding to your legacy here as an ILL INFORMED CLOWN .
The FEDS call it LOW INCOME and below that is POVERTY LEVEL you STUPID **** JERKWAD!!
GO **** YOURSELF!! YOU got your *** handed to you on this one, so RUN ALONG NOW AND GO BACK TO SUCKING THAT BIG BLACLK COCK you love so much!! (notice he never denies he sucks cock like the good little CUCKY he is!! Most Jew hating NAZIS are cock sucking cucks!!)
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
1 Nov 2024 6:34 pm
*Beekeeper » 01 Nov 2024, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑ The FEDS call it LOW INCOME and below that is POVERTY LEVEL you STUPID **** JERKWAD!!
GO **** YOURSELF!! YOU got your *** handed to you on this one, so RUN ALONG NOW AND GO BACK TO SUCKING THAT BIG BLACLK COCK you love so much!! (notice he never denies he sucks cock like the good little CUCKY he is!! Most Jew hating NAZIS are cock sucking cucks!!)
WRONG...!!*Beekeeper » Yesterday, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 5:36 pm
They [Federal Government] can [dictate to the states what the low income thresholds shall be].
WRONG...!!!
BEEKEEPER HAS ALREADY BEEN PROVEN WRONG WHEN I PRODUCED THE LOW INCOME PROPERTY TAX PROGRAM OF WASHINGTON STATE THAT ALLOW INCOME AS HIGH AS $60,000 TO MEET THE STANDARD
Seeing how that SUPREMACY CLAUSE dictates that the STATE'S ANYTHING that has a corresponding FEDERAL LAW is supreme to any STATE LAW!!
Article VI, Clause 2:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
The Supremacy Clause obviously has no bearing on what any State, City or County wishes to use as criteria to meet the definition of LOW INCOME
https://www.ncontracts.com/nsight-blog/ ... rification
“Supervisory guidance does not have the force and effect of law, and the agencies do not take enforcement actions based on supervisory guidance,”
YOU KEEP MAKING YOURSELF LOOK SO TOTALLY **** STUPID...KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK YOU CLUELESS IDIOT...!!!""[b/]
1 Nov 2024 6:46 pm
"The Department of Housing and Urban Development now says a Seattle-area family of four with household earnings under $72,000 is low-income."*Beekeeper » 01 Nov 2024, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑ The FEDS call it LOW INCOME and below that is POVERTY LEVEL you STUPID **** JERKWAD!!
GO **** YOURSELF!! YOU got your *** handed to you on this one, so RUN ALONG NOW AND GO BACK TO SUCKING THAT BIG BLACLK COCK you love so much!! (notice he never denies he sucks cock like the good little CUCKY he is!! Most Jew hating NAZIS are cock sucking cucks!!)
https://www.seattlepi.com/seattlenews/a ... 102151.php
"The Department of Housing and Urban Development now says a Seattle-area family of four with household earnings under $72,000 is low-income."https://www.seattlepi.com/seattlenews/article/What-s-low-income-in-Seattle-72-000-11102151.php
NOW GO TAKE YOUR BEATING LIKE A MAN...!!!
2 Nov 2024 4:06 am
GHETTOBLASTER » 01 Nov 2024, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ "The Department of Housing and Urban Development now says a Seattle-area family of four with household earnings under $72,000 is low-income."
https://www.seattlepi.com/seattlenews/a ... 102151.php
https://www.seattlepi.com/seattlenews/article/What-s-low-income-in-Seattle-72-000-11102151.php
NOW GO TAKE YOUR BEATING LIKE A MAN...!!!
https://i.postimg.cc/Pf04sdrF/****.jpg
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
2 Nov 2024 7:27 am
*Beekeeper » 02 Nov 2024, 4:06 am » wrote: ↑*Beekeeper » 28 Oct 2024, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑
28 Oct 2024, 9:11 am
Here, let's just CURB STOMP YOUR *** MASSIVELY!! Again!!
So that PROVES that using a $50,000 annual income turns your little "study" into, well, PURE UNADULTERED ****!!
Damn, that has to hurt and suck for you at the same time
"The Department of Housing and Urban Development now says a Seattle-area family of four with household earnings under $72,000 is low-income."
https://www.seattlepi.com/seattlenews/a ... 102151.php
"The Department of Housing and Urban Development now says a Seattle-area family of four with household earnings under $72,000 is low-income."https://www.seattlepi.com/seattlenews/article/What-s-low-income-in-Seattle-72-000-11102151.php
NOW GO TAKE YOUR BEATING LIKE A MAN...!!!
Who is online
In total there are 3696 users online :: 11 registered, 15 bots, and 3670 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Buck Naked, ROG62, ConservativeWave, jerra b, Imperial Wizard, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101
Bots: DuckDuckGo, Java/1.8, Bolt, Mediatoolkitbot, DuckDuckBot, Not, ADmantX, CriteoBot, proximic, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, Googlebot